336902184
|
0419700
|
2012-10-17
|
12905 SHIREWOOD LANE, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32224
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Complete
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2012-10-17
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: EISAOF
|
Case Closed |
2018-06-14
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-12-03 |
Current Penalty |
2400.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, strucure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. End frames were used as a means of access. a. On or about October 17, 2012, two employees performing siding operations did not have a safe means of access/egress, in that they used the end frames to access a two buck scaffold system, exposing themselves to a 13 foot fall hazard. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
Issuance Date |
2012-12-03 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-12-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: a. On or about October 17, 2012, employees performing siding operations were not trained to recognize, control or minimize hazards associated with scaffold usage. |
|
Citation ID |
01002A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2012-12-03 |
Current Penalty |
2400.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2400.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about October 17, 2012, on a 4:12 pitch roof, two employees performing siding operations were not protected from a 8 feet 9-inch fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection. |
|
Citation ID |
01002B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-12-03 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-12-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about October 17, 2012, employees performing siding operations were not trained to recognize, control or minimize hazards while working from elevation. |
|
|
336779780
|
0419700
|
2012-10-10
|
231 GLENWOOD ST, PONTE VEDRA, FL, 32081
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Complete
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2012-10-10
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: EISAOF
|
Case Closed |
2018-03-02
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260152 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-11-28 |
Current Penalty |
1360.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1360.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.152(a)(1): Containers and portable tanks used for the storage and handling of flammable and combustible liquids were not approved: a. On or about October 10, 2012, at the northwest side of the house, a damaged portable tank was used for storage and handling of gasoline used to fuel the air compressor. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2012-11-28 |
Current Penalty |
2040.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2040.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
3 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a. On or about October 10, 2012, on the front of the house, an employee installing framing did not use an adequate anchor point for his personal fall arrest system, exposing himself to a 9 feet fall hazard. b. On or about October 10, 2012, in the trusses on the southwest side of the roof, an employee installing framing was exposed to a 14 feet fall hazard in that he was not protected by a fall protection system. c. On or about October 10, 2012, at the south corner of the house, an employee installing framing was exposed to a 9 feet fall hazard in that he was not protected by a fall protection system. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-11-28 |
Current Penalty |
2040.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2040.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a. On or about October 10, 2012, at the south corner of the house, the roof access ladder did not extend above the roof eave, exposing an employee to a 9 feet fall hazard. |
|
Citation ID |
01004 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261053 B16 |
Issuance Date |
2012-11-28 |
Current Penalty |
2040.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2040.0 |
Final Order |
2012-12-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: a. On or about October 10, 2012, inside the house, a 20-foot aluminum extension ladder that framing employees used to access the trusses was missing a pawl on the fly section. |
|
|
335361382
|
0420600
|
2012-07-24
|
6270 SW 20TH ST., POMPANO BEACH, FL, 33068
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2012-07-24
|
Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: EISAX, L: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2016-11-16
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-07-27 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-08-17 |
Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
Final Order |
2012-09-28 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. At the site - an employee in the process of stucco activities was exposed to a 12' 11" fall hazard, in that, fall protection equipment was not installed or utilized on the lower overhang, observed on or about 07/24/12. b. At the site - an employee in the process of stucco activities was exposed to an approximate 15 foot fall hazard, in that, fall protection equipment was not installed or utilized on the upper overhang, observed on or about 07/24/12. |
|
|