Daniel Mige, etc., Appellant(s), v. Bayside Marketplace, LLC, et al., Appellee(s).
|
3D2024-0150
|
2024-01-23
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
19-19854
|
Parties
Name |
Daniel Mige
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Andy Loynaz
|
|
Name |
BAYSIDE MARKETPLACE, LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Josephine Blair Rahn, Richard William Ervin, IV
|
|
Name |
INTERSTATE CLEANING CORPORATION
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Josephine Blair Rahn, Richard William Ervin, IV
|
|
Name |
Hon. Charles Kenneth Johnson
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2024-11-27
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed
|
Description |
Affirmed
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-10-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Upon consideration, the parties' Requests for Oral Argument are hereby denied.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-09-18
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-09-16
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Appellees' Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
Bayside Marketplace, LLC
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-08-30
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-08-01
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Bayside Marketplace, LLC
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-08-01
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Bayside Marketplace, LLC
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-28
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief-30 days to 07/31/2024(GRANTED)
|
On Behalf Of |
Bayside Marketplace, LLC
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-26
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
Bayside Marketplace, LLC
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-03
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-03
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-04-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
Description |
The Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel for Appellees is treated as
a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel, and the motion is granted, and
the law firm of Bleakley Bavol Denman & Grace, and R.G. McCormick, Jr.,
Esquire, are withdrawn as counsel for Appellees, and relieved from any
further responsibility in this cause.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-04-10
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
Bayside Marketplace, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-04-09
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Appellant's Amended Motion for Extension of Time to file initial
brief is hereby granted to and including sixty (60) days from April 4, 2024.
Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent
extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-04-04
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-08
|
Type |
Event
|
Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-08
|
Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
Description |
Case filing fee $300 paid through the portal. Batch # 10264340
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-02
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-01-23
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
This is to notify counsel for appellant that the filing and prosecution of a notice of appeal in this Court is not acceptable without compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, this appeal will be dismissed unless the required three hundred dollar ($300.00) fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before February 2, 2024.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-01-23
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment of a New Case Letter. The 3DCA $300 filing fee for a notice of appeal is due.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-01-23
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal
|
On Behalf Of |
Daniel Mige
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-12-18
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-12-18
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-23
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Pursuant to the time schedule provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the time for filing the initial brief has expired. This cause will be subject to dismissal unless the document referred to is filed within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, or within said time the Court is otherwise notified that this matter is being diligently prosecuted.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-02-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Upon consideration, Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to file the initial brief is hereby denied without prejudice to the refiling of a motion for extension of time, within five (5) days from the date of this Order, that complies with the conferral requirement of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a) ("A motion for an extension of time shall . . . contain a certificate that the movant's counsel [or the party, if pro se] has consulted opposing counsel [or opposing party, if pro se] and that the movant's counsel [or the movant, if pro se] is authorized to represent that opposing counsel [or opposing party, if pro se] either has no objection or will promptly file an objection.").
|
View |
View File
|
|
|
JO-EL SWARTZ VS INTERSTATE CLEANING CORPORATION, et al.
|
4D2023-1255
|
2023-05-23
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE21003955
|
Parties
Name |
Jo-El Swartz
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Robert C. Rogers, Jr.
|
|
Name |
INTERSTATE CLEANING CORPORATION
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Josephine B. Rahn, Robert W. Bleakley
|
|
Name |
SUNRISE MILLS (MLP) LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Hon. David A. Haimes
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 22, 2023 document is stricken without prejudice to filing an initial brief.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-08-03
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissed-Failure to Comply ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this court's June 28, 2023 order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-08-03
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-07-21
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice
|
Description |
Notice ~ OF INABILITY TO TRANSMIT THE RECORD
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order
|
Description |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed or other sanctions imposed for failure to comply with this court's June 28, 2023 order requiring a conformed copy of the order being appealed to be filed with this court. If the order is filed within this ten (10) day period, this order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-06-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Ord-Denying Clarification ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 20, 2023 motion for clarification is denied. Appellant is directed to submit a conformed copy of the January 19, 2023 final judgment which is the subject of the motion for new trial, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, for the purpose of determining whether the filing of the motion for new trial tolled the jurisdictional time limit of the filing of the Notice of Appeal.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-06-22
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ **STRICKEN**
|
On Behalf Of |
Jo-El Swartz
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-06-20
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Motion For Clarification
|
On Behalf Of |
Jo-El Swartz
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-06-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 9, 2023 motion is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the appellee with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the appellee. Appellant may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the appellee within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-05-24
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-05-23
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-05-23
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
Jo-El Swartz
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Motion for Clarification ~ **STRICKEN**
|
On Behalf Of |
Jo-El Swartz
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-05-25
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
Description |
Aplnt to file underlying order being appealed ~ The Notice of Appeal seeks an appeal of the order denying a motion for new trial. An order denying a motion for new trial is not independently appealable. Within ten (10) days from the date of this order, Appellant shall submit a conformed copy of the underlying order which is the subject of the motion for new trial for the purpose of determining whether the filing of the motion for new trial tolled the jurisdictional time limit of the filing of the Notice of Appeal of the underlying order from which appellant seeks review.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-05-24
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee - pro se civil appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED, appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee.If appellant has already been found indigent for purposes of proceedings in the lower tribunal, in this case, appellant shall file a copy of that order in this court. If appellant does not have an order or a determination of indigent status and believes that he or she is insolvent, appellant shall complete the enclosed application and mail to the clerk of the lower tribunal within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. A Notice of Compliance that you have applied for indigent status, must also be filed with this court. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall forward the Clerk's Determination to this court within ten (10) days of receipt. Failure of appellant to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
|
BRAD NITZBERG and PATRICE NITZBERG VS THE TOWN CENTER AT BOCA RATON TRUST and INTERSTATE CLEANING CORPORATION
|
4D2022-2166
|
2022-08-10
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502020CA004749XXXX-MB
|
Parties
Name |
Brad Nitzberg
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Kyle Quintana, Ronald M. Simon, Nichole J. Segal, Bard D. Rockenbach
|
|
Name |
Patrice Nitzberg
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
The Town Center at Boca Raton Trust
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Gina Messina, Robert W. Bleakley, Josephine B. Rahn
|
|
Name |
INTERSTATE CLEANING CORPORATION
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Hon. John S. Kastrenakes
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2023-02-03
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the February 2, 2023 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-03
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-02
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
On Behalf Of |
Brad Nitzberg
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-04
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants' December 19, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Brad Nitzberg
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-11-17
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 12/19/22.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-11-17
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Brad Nitzberg
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-17
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Brad Nitzberg
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-17
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 11/17/22.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-27
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ (906 PAGES)
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-12
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
The Town Center at Boca Raton Trust
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-11
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-11
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-10
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
Brad Nitzberg
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-10
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
|
DR. CHARLES BROCK VS WESTFIELD PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC
|
2D2021-2835
|
2021-09-14
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
2nd District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County
17-CA-004760
|
Parties
Name |
DR. CHARLES BROCK
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
CHRIS M. LIMBEROPOULOS, ESQ.
|
|
Name |
INTERSTATE CLEANING CORPORATION
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
WESTFIELD PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
ROBERT W. BLEAKLEY, ESQ., JOSEPHINE RAHN, ESQ.
|
|
Name |
HON. REX MARTIN BARBAS
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
HILLSBOROUGH CLERK
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Closed
|
Description |
Case Closed
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL ~ Pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-11
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
On Behalf Of |
DR. CHARLES BROCK
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-30
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shallbe served by January 11, 2022.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ APPELLANT'S AMENDED MOTION FOREXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
DR. CHARLES BROCK
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-19
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
deny eot for no consultation ~ Appellant's motion for an extension of time is denied without prejudice to refile a motion within five days that demonstrates compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a) with respect to consultation with opposing counsel, failing which the brief shall be served by the current due date or within ten days of the date of this order, whichever is later.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-18
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOREXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
DR. CHARLES BROCK
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-18
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ BARBAS - 1066 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-04
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
Description |
ORDER VACATED ~ This court's October 13, 2021, order is vacated.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-13
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ BLACK, LUCAS, and SMITH
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-18
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
Description |
Motion For Reinstatement ~ MOTION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL
|
On Behalf Of |
DR. CHARLES BROCK
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-18
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Order Appealed
|
Description |
Order Appealed
|
On Behalf Of |
DR. CHARLES BROCK
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-13
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORD-SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL ~ ***VACATED - SEE 11/4/21 ORDER***This appeal is dismissed for Appellant's failure to respond to this court'sSeptember 14, 2021, order to show cause.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-14
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause re No Order Appealed
|
Description |
OSC - no order appealed ~ ***DISCHARGED - SEE 11/4/21 ORDER***
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-14
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-14
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
DR. CHARLES BROCK
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-14
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|