| Docket Date |
2021-08-18
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-18
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of the appellants’ July 2, 2021 jurisdictional brief and the appellees’ July 30, 2021 response, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal does not contain an express finding that, as a matter of law, the settlement agreement was unenforceable, was set aside, or never existed. The inclusion of the phrase "as a matter of law" did not cure this defect. It is further, ORDERED that the appellants’ August 4, 2021 motion for leave to file a reply is denied as moot.GROSS, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NOTICE OF NON-OBJECTION TO APPELLANTS' MOTION TO FILEREPLY BRIEF TO APPELLEE'S RESPONSE EXPLAINING COURT'SSUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tropix Express, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 4, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before September 6, 2021. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-04
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lissette Johanna Bustamante Jiminez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lissette Johanna Bustamante Jiminez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANTS' STATEMENT EXPLAINING THIS COURT'S SUBJECT MAT TER JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tropix Express, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s July 2, 2021 jurisdictional brief.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 9, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before August 7, 2021. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-09
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lissette Johanna Bustamante Jiminez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-02
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lissette Johanna Bustamante Jiminez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the June 17, 2021 order is an appealable nonfinal order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 as the order denies the motion to enforce settlement but does not appear to determine that, as a matter of law, a settlement agreement is unenforceable, set aside, or never existed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ix). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-24
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-24
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lissette Johanna Bustamante Jiminez
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Lissette Johanna Bustamante Jiminez
|
|
