Docket Date |
2020-09-30
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the September 29, 2020 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed. Further,ORDERED that appellees’ July 27, 2020 motion for attorney’s fees is denied as moot.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-30
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-29
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ "STIPULATION"
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-09-22
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-07-27
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
On Behalf Of |
7-ELEVEN, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-07-24
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
7-ELEVEN, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-06-18
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 7/26/20
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-06-18
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
7-ELEVEN, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-05-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 6/26/20
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-05-20
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
7-ELEVEN, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-05-06
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-27
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
Description |
Amended Appellant's Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-24
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause
|
Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before May 4, 2020, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-03
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
Description |
Grant Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that appellees' March 24, 2020 motion to strike the initial brief is granted, and appellant's initial brief is stricken without prejudice to filing an amended initial brief without reference to documents outside the appellate record within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-04-01
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-24
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
Description |
Motion To Strike
|
On Behalf Of |
7-ELEVEN, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ Upon consideration of appellees' March 6, 2020 response and appellant's March 18, 2020 reply, it is ORDERED that appellant's March 5, 2020 motion to supplement the record on appeal is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-18
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
Description |
Reply to Response
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-13
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file a reply to appellees' March 6, 2020 response within five (5) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-06
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEAL
|
On Behalf Of |
7-ELEVEN, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-05
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-03-02
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ ***STRICKEN 4/3/2020***
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-02-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant's February 19, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted in part. Appellant shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-02-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-01-14
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 6, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before February 20, 2020. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2020-01-06
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's November 22, 2019 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within forty-five (45) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-11-22
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-29
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ 259 PAGES
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-07
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
Description |
ORD-Reinstatement ~ ORDERED that the appellant's October 4, 2019 motion for reinstatement is granted, and the above-styled appeal is reinstated.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-04
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
Description |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-04
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ INVOICE VOIDED
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-03
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-03
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-10-03
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-No Filing Fee ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for nonpayment of the $300.00 filing fee.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-09-17
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-09-16
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-09-16
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-09-13
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
CARMEN ORTIZ SANTIAGO
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-09-13
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|