| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2018-04-03
|
| Case Closed |
2018-08-29
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1269897 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-26 |
| Current Penalty |
1663.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1663.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-04-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about April 3rd, 2018, at the site located at 8400 Garden Rd, Ste. A-2, FL 33404, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees who were required to wear respiratory protection such as NIOSH approved brand 3M, model 6000, half face elastomeric respirator, model 6000 with combined filters for organic vapors and N95 particulate pre-filter. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-04-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about April 3rd, 2018, at the site located at 8400 Garden Rd, Ste. A-2, FL 33404, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees who are required to wear tight-fitting respirators type 3M model 6000, when performing grinding, sanding and painting of aluminum surfaces preparation. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-04-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): On or about April 3rd, 2018, at the site located at 8400 Garden Rd, Ste. A-2, FL 33404, the employer did not provide a fit test for employees who are required to wear tight-fitting respirators type 3M model 6000, when performing grinding, sanding and painting of aluminum surfaces preparation. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001D |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 G01 I A |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-04-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: On or about April 3rd, 2018, at the site located at 8400 Garden Rd, Ste. A-2, FL 33404, the employees were required to use tight-fitting respirators type 3M model 6000 and also were allowed to have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face providing poor or no seal to the respirator. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001E |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 K01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-04-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator: On or about April 3rd, 2018, at the site located at 8400 Garden Rd, Ste. A-2, FL 33404, the employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary, proper fit, usage, or maintenance for employees using a tight-fitting half face elastomeric respirator such as NIOSH approved brand 3M, model 6000. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-05 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-04-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-04-23 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about April 3rd, 2018, at the site located at 8400 Garden Rd, Ste. A-2, FL 33404, the employer did not provide effective training to employees about the chemical hazards such as but not limited to Prime 94 (Cyclohexane) and Acetone used while performing grinding, sanding, polishing and painting operations. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-10-05
|
| Emphasis |
L: FORKLIFT
|
| Case Closed |
2018-07-13
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1269897 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100178 L01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2018-04-05 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-05-01 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about October 5th, 2017, at the site located at 8400 Garden Rd, Ste. A-2, FL 33404, the employer did not ensure that employees operating a forklift brand Toyota, Model SFGC25, had successfully completed the training required. |
|
|
