Docket Date |
2024-10-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
Description |
Appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty days from the date of this order, or this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice based on failure to prosecute.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-08-27
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
Description |
The March 11, 2024, Order to Show Cause is hereby discharged.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-11-26
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
Description |
APPELLANT'S EXPEDITED MOTION TO CORRECT AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-11-26
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-10-21
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-07-22
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-07-16
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal Redacted
|
Description |
DANIEL - 1014 PAGES
|
On Behalf Of |
HILLSBOROUGH CLERK
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-07-03
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
Description |
Petitioner is hereby directed to show cause on or before July 18, 2024, why the petition for review should not be dismissed as moot. Respondent may serve a reply on or before July 29, 2024.
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-07-01
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Status Report
|
Description |
Status Report
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-07-01
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
Description |
Appellant's motion for reinstatement is granted. This court's April 25, 2024, order is vacated, and the appeal is reinstated. Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted. Jurisdiction is relinquished for 20 days, to the extent necessary, to allow the trial court to enter an appealable, final order. Because case no. 2D2024-0585 has been dismissed, Appellant's motion to consolidate is denied.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-25
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
Description |
APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-25
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING FINALITY OR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-07
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
Description |
Within 15 days from the date of this order, Appellant shall respond to this court's March 11, 2024, order to show cause. Appellant's motion for reinstatement remains pending.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-06-04
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
Description |
Motion For Reinstatement - PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL, EXTENSION OF TIME AND SET ASIDE DISMISSAL DUE TO CLERICAL MISCOMMUNICATION, "NEW ADMINSTRATIVE COURT SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION ERRORED MIGRATION OF FILED APPEALS WITH DEFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS"
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
Description |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-05-30
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court SC2024-0807
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-05-29
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-05-28
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
Description |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-05-28
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
Description |
Motion For Reinstatement
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-04-25
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
This case is dismissed based on Appellant's failure to respond to
this court's March 11, 2024, Order to Show Cause.
SLEET, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-03-11
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ W/ORDER
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-03-11
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
HL:Fee Owed
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-03-11
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-03-11
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause Jurisdiction
|
Description |
OSC/Better Gov't Assn (motion to dismiss) ~ Appellant shall show cause within twenty days why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Hayward & Assocs., Inc. v. Hoffman, 793 So. 2d 89, 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ("[I]t is well-established that an order that merely grants a motion to dismiss, as contrasted with an order dismissing a complaint or an action, is not a final order."); Better Gov't Ass'n of Sarasota Cnty. v. State, 802 So. 2d 414, 415 n.3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Jurisdiction is relinquished to the extent necessary to allow the trial court to enter an appealable, final order. Should appellant provide this court with such an appealable, final order within twenty days, this premature appeal will be mature and will proceed to consideration. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l) (stating that if a notice of appeal is prematurely filed before rendition of a final order, "the lower tribunal retains jurisdiction to render a final order"). If Appellant fails to present an appealable order within that time frame or persuade this court that the existing order is appealable, this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice.
|
|
Docket Date |
2025-01-02
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
Description |
APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLEES' IBRAHIM GHOBRIAL AND HILLSBOROUGH BP INC.'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-12-23
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
HILLSBOROUGH BP, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-12-12
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Quash
|
Description |
APPELLANT'S MOTION TO QUASH APPELLEE'S MOTION TO STRIKE INITIAL BRIEF AS SHAM PLEADING AND REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS
|
On Behalf Of |
MARC SULTAN
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-12-02
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
Description |
APPELLEES', BILL MCKNIGHT, PETE ELGERS AND AUTOMATED PETROLEUM & ENERGY COMPANY INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLANT'S INITIAL BRIEF AS A SHAM PLEADING
|
On Behalf Of |
HILLSBOROUGH BP, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-11-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Appellant's motion for an extension of time is granted, and Appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty days of the date of this order. However, no further motions for an extension of time will be entertained. Failure to timely serve the initial brief will subject this appeal to dismissal without further notice.
|
View |
View File
|
|
Docket Date |
2024-07-26
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
Description |
Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the Second District Court of Appeal on April 25, 2024, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980).
No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the Court.
|
|