M & H CORPORATION - Florida Company Profile

Classification	Discretionary Review - Notice to Invoke - Direct Conflict of Decisions
Court	Supreme Court of Florida
Originating Court	1st District Court of Appeal 1D2023-0284;

Parties

Name	M.H. Mother of M.K.R.D., K.S.P.D., Minor Children,
Role	Petitioner
Status	Active
Name	M & H CORPORATION
Role	Petitioner
Status	Active
Name	CHILDREN'S LEGAL SERVICES, FL DEPT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Role	Respondent
Status	Active
Representations	Sarah J. Rumph
Name	Hon. David James Oberliesen
Role	Judge/Judicial Officer
Status	Active
Name	1DCA Clerk
Role	Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status	Active
Name	Santa Rosa Clerk
Role	Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status	Active
Name	STATEWIDE GUARDIAN AD LITEM
Role	Respondent
Status	Active
Representations	Caitlin E. Burke, Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb

Docket Entries

Docket Date	2023-10-13
Type	Event
Subtype	No Fee Required
Description	No Fee Required
Docket Date	2023-10-13
Type	Notice
Subtype	Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
Description	Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
On Behalf Of	M.H. Mother of M.K.R.D., K.S.P.D., Minor Children,
Docket Date	2023-10-13
Type	Disposition
Subtype	Rev/Appeal Dism No Juris Omnibus
Description	Petitioner's Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction, seeking review of the order or opinion issued by the First District Court of Appeal on September 28, 2023, is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State, 926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v. Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ'g Co. v. Editorial Am. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the Court.