|
Maraist Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner(s) v. Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, et al., Respondent(s)
|
SC2023-1437
|
2023-10-18
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Writ - Prohibition
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
4D21-2871; 4D21- 3579; 4D21-3580; 4D22-900
|
Parties
| Name |
PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Timothy Schulz
|
|
| Name |
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Alan Benjamin Rose, Gregory Scott Weiss
|
|
| Name |
4DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Palm Beach Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Respondents' Joint Response in Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| Description |
Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| Description |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-20
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Stay (Proceedings Below)
|
| Description |
Petitioner's Motion to Stay Fourth District Court of Appeal November 15, 2023 Order with Request for Expedited Ruling
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-06
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dism as Moot
|
| Description |
The petition for writ of prohibition and the motion for stay are hereby dismissed as moot. No motion for rehearing will be entertained.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-20
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Compliance
|
| Description |
Petitioner's Notice of Service of its Motion to Stay Fourth District Court of Appeal November 15, 2023 Order with Request for Expedited Ruling and Appendix on Appellees' Counsel, Lower Court and Clerk
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Filing Fee Due
|
| Description |
The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Prohibition; however, said petition was not accompanied by the $300.00 filing fee or a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing the petition. Petitioner is allowed to and including November 20, 2023, in which to submit the filing fee or a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with sections 57.081 and 57.082, Florida Statutes. The petition will not be submitted to the Court until receipt of the above. Failure to submit the filing fee or the above referenced document to this Court could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the petition.
Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it is not subject to reinstatement.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
Maraist Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner(s) v. Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, et al., Respondent(s)
|
SC2023-1183
|
2023-08-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Writ - Prohibition
|
| Court |
Supreme Court of Florida
|
| Originating Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
4D21-2871; 4D21-3580; 4D22-0900; 4D21-3579
|
Parties
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W. Maraist
|
|
| Name |
PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Timothy Warren Schulz
|
|
| Name |
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Alan B. Rose, Gregory S. Weiss
|
|
| Name |
4DCA Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Palm Beach Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-09-14
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dism as Moot
|
| Description |
The petition is hereby dismissed as moot. No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
PERLMAN, BAJANDAS, YEVOLI & ALBRIGHT, P.L., v. ATLAS HOLDING CORPORATION, Florida Fourth DCA Case No. 4D22-1827
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Appendix/Attachment to Notice
|
| Description |
Notice of Appendix/Attachment to Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-01
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Request-Judicial Notice
|
| Description |
Request for Judicial Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| Description |
Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Appendix (Supplemental)
|
| Description |
Supplemental Appendix to Appendix A to Petition for Writ of Prohibition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| Description |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case-Pay Fee
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case-Pay Fee
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Filed
|
| Description |
Petition for Writ of Prohibition
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A. and PATRICK MARAIST, Appellant(s) v. NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC. and PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee(s).
|
4D2022-3390
|
2022-12-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502008CA039646
|
Parties
| Name |
Patrick W Maraist
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Name |
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Gregory Scott Weiss, Alan Benjamin Rose, Timothy W. Schulz
|
|
| Name |
PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Scott Ryan Kerner
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-10-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-13
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-21
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-05
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-05
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| Description |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-18
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ Upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotels and Office Building Limited Partnership’s April 18, 2023 response and appellants Maraist Law Firm, P.A. and Patrick Maraist’s April 24, 2023 response, it isORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 20, 2023 motion to file supplemental record is granted. The proposed transcript is deemed filed as part of the record on appeal. Further, Upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotels and Office Building Limited Partnership’s April 24, 2023 response, it is ORDERED that appellants Maraist Law Firm, P.A. and Patrick Maraist’s April 24, 2023 request to strike is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ ***MOTION GRANTED***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO REQUEST TO STRIKE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-24
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-20
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Joinder in Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Joinder ~ OF ANSWER BRIEF BY APPELLEE NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-18
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ **NOTICE OF JOINDER IN BRIEF FILED 4/19/23**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ APPELLEE PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL'S RESPONSE TO APPELLEE NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-10
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-10
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO RULE 9.400(b) MOTION TO RECOVER CONTRACTUAL APPELLATE ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM APPELLEE, NANTUCKET
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-27
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 1029 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s December 27, 2022 notice of joinder and appellants Maraist Law Firm, P.A. and Patrick Maraist’s January 6, 2023 response, it is ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s December 22, 2022 motion to dismiss is denied. Further, ORDERED that the court determines that this appeal seeks review of a final order, rather than a non–final order. Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 1976). Appellants may file directions to the clerk under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(a)(3) within ten (10) days from the date of this order, and appellees may file directions for additional documents and exhibits within ten (10) days after the appellants’ filing of directions to the clerk. The times for preparing the record on appeal, serving the index to the record on appeal, and for service of briefs are extended correspondingly. Further, upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s December 22, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellants Maraist Law Firm, P.A. and Patrick Maraist’s December 22, 2022 motion to consolidate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-06
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-06
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ AMENDED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
Order Vacated ~ ORDERED that this court's December 22, 2022 ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal order is vacated.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Patrick W Maraist
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A. VS PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
4D2022-0900
|
2022-03-31
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502008CA039646
|
Parties
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W. Maraist
|
|
| Name |
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Alan Benjamin Rose, Timothy W. Schulz
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Howard Coates, Jr.
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Scott Ryan Kerner
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellees may respond to appellant's motion to transfer filed July 27, 2023, within five (5) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ APPELLEES' JOINT NOTICE REGARDINGAPPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions ~ AGAINST APPELLEE HOTEL AND ITS COUNSEL TIMOTHY SCHULZ
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGEGERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA INTHESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS AND RE-ASSIGNMENT TO THETHIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Transfer
|
| Description |
Motion To Transfer To Another Court ~ AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA IN THESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 16, 2023 motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, written opinion, and clarification is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s June 16, 2023 “motion fo[r] rehearing as to June 15, 2023 appellate fee award to appellees” is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s July 17, 2023 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO APPELLEES' RESPONSES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-14387 Supreme Court Order Dismissed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
JOINT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion for Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE TO LATEST MOTION FOR REHEARING BY APPELLANT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION OF NOVEMBER 15, 2023 ORDER GRANTING APPELLEES' MOTION REQUEST FOR POST JUDGMENT INTEREST
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-1437 Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CORRECTED PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND APPENDIX IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM APPELLANT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-14
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's August 23, 2023 order is amended to include the consolidated case numbers as follows: ORDERED that the appellant's August 21, 2023 motions to stay issuance of the mandate and for rehearing are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FORREHEARING AND MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC2023-1183
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OFPROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate ~ PENDING RULING ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF AUGUST 10, 2023 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 27, 2023 motion to disqualify and reassignment to another court is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s August 7, 2023 supplemental motion is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TODISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANELAND TRANSFER THIS APPEAL TO A DIFFERENT COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'SMOTION FOR REHEARING, ET AL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ AS TO JUNE 15, 2023 APPELLATE FEE AWARD TO APPELLEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF PENDING UNDECIDED FEE AND SANCTIONS MOTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted in Part/Denied in Part
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant in Part/Deny in Part ~ Ordered that appellees’ May 21, 2023 motion to strike notices of supplemental authority is granted as to notices filed on March 2, 2023, May 10, 2023, and May 17, 2023. A Notice of Supplemental Authority cannot be used to raise new issues nor to contain argument, which these notices do. The motion is denied as to the remaining notices of supplemental authority.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Authored Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
Deny Consolidation ~ Upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s December 23, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s December 22, 2022 motion to consolidate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS 4D22-3390 AS NOTICE PENDING MOTIONS ARE RIPE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar Case Pending ~ W/4D22-3390
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Ord-Denying Leave to file Reply ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 2, 2022 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (CORRECTED RESPONSE)Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF INCORRECT FILING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Nantucket Enterprises
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Confidential Information Within Court Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ ORABATEMENT OF APPELLANTS' SANCTIONS MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership ("PB Hotel"), and its counsel Timothy W. Schulz
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO PALM BEACH HOTEL MOT. FOR ATTY. FEES.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-29
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (234 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s July 13, 2022 motion to supplement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO EXCEED RULE 9.210(a)(2)(B) LIMITS, MOTION TO THE SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL, MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REVIEW
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Motion For Review
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (846 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF COMPLIANCE WITH APRIL 4, 2022 ORDER AND ATTACHMENT OF TRIAL COURT ORDER DENYING THE MOTION FOR REHEARING RENDERING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RIPE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Abeyance Order
|
| Description |
Order Holding Case in Abeyance Per R. 9.020(h)(2)(C) ~ This court notes that a motion tolling rendition is pending in the trial court. ORDERED that the above-styled case is held in abeyance until the trial court disposes of the motion and appellant files a copy of the order in this court. On that date, this case shall proceed, and the briefing schedule shall run from that date. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h)(2)(C). If the trial court has not entered an order disposing of the motion within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file a status report with this court as to the progress being made towards disposition of the motion.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ **RESPONSE FILED** Palm Beach Florida Hotel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 13, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion For Review ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s June 16, 2022 response and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s June 21, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s June 15, 2022 “Rule 9.310(f) Motion for Review of Trial Court June 10, 2022 Order Denying Rule 9.310(A) Motion” is denied. Further, upon consideration of appellees’ June 24, 2022 Joint Response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s June 22, 2022 “Motion to Exceed Rule 9.210(A)(2)(B) Limits, Motion to the Supplement Record on Appeal, Motion for Judicial Notice and Motion for Extension of Time” is denied, save for appellant’s request to supplement the record, which is denied without prejudice to appellant refiling a motion to supplement the record which specifically lists what was omitted from the record and what it seeks to supplement the record with. Appellant shall file the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice. Further,ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A. is again cautioned against excessive and unnecessary motion practice, and advised that continued excessive and unnecessary motion practice may subject appellant to sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET, RESPONSE TO MOTION FORREHEARING AS TO JUNE 15, 2023 APPELLATE FEE AWARD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion for Sanctions ~ ORDERED that appellant’s October 24, 2022 “Rule 9.410(b) motion for sanctions against appellee Hotel and its counsel Timothy Schulz” is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s October 24, 2022 “Rule 9.410(b) motion for sanctions against appellee Nantucket and its counsel Alan Rose and Gregg Weiss” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Deny EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s November 7, 2022 motion for an extension of time or abatement of appellant's sanction motion is denied. The Court accepts Nantucket Enterprise, Inc.’s adoption of “the arguments raised by the other Appellees in the October 26, 2022, filing entitled Appellee's and Counsel's Response in Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Sanctions” as its response. Nantucket Enterprise, Inc. may file an additional response that does not restate the arguments raised by the other appellees within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's April 25, 2022 order is amended to add the Clerk of the Circuit Court: Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 7, 2022 “Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe,” it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further,ORDERED that appellees’ April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 1, 2022 “Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions” is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and part. The material requeste
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 7, 2022 “Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe,” it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, ORDERED that appellees’ April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 1, 2022 “Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions” is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and Procured through Improper Draconian and Subsequently Stayed Bench Warrants Requested by the Parties and Their Counsel. See Fla.
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A. VS PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
4D2021-3579
|
2021-12-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502008CA039646
|
Parties
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
9999-02-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous (DNU) ~ ***4D21-2871, 4D21-3579 AND 4D21-3580 ARE CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SEE 4D21-2871 FOR ALL FUTURE DOCKET ENTRIES.***
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-14387 Supreme Court Order Dismissed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
JOINT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion for Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE TO LATEST MOTION FOR REHEARING BY APPELLANT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION OF NOVEMBER 15, 2023 ORDER GRANTING APPELLEES' MOTION REQUEST FOR POST JUDGMENT INTEREST
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-1437 Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CORRECTED PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND APPENDIX IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM APPELLANT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-14
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's August 23, 2023 order is amended to include the consolidated case numbers as follows: ORDERED that the appellant's August 21, 2023 motions to stay issuance of the mandate and for rehearing are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC2023-1183
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FORREHEARING AND MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate ~ PENDING RULING ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF AUGUST 10, 2023 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OFPROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 27, 2023 motion to disqualify and reassignment to another court is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s August 7, 2023 supplemental motion is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TODISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANELAND TRANSFER THIS APPEAL TO A DIFFERENT COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellees may respond to appellant's motion to transfer filed July 27, 2023, within five (5) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ APPELLEES' JOINT NOTICE REGARDINGAPPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Transfer
|
| Description |
Motion To Transfer To Another Court ~ AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA IN THESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGEGERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA INTHESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS AND RE-ASSIGNMENT TO THETHIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 16, 2023 motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, written opinion, and clarification is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s June 16, 2023 “motion fo[r] rehearing as to June 15, 2023 appellate fee award to appellees” is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s July 17, 2023 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO APPELLEES' RESPONSES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET, RESPONSE TO MOTION FORREHEARING AS TO JUNE 15, 2023 APPELLATE FEE AWARD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'SMOTION FOR REHEARING AS TO JUNE 15, 2023APPELLATE FEE AWARD TO APPELLEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ AS TO JUNE 15, 2023 APPELLATE FEE AWARD TO APPELLEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Deny Attorney's Fees ~ ORDERED that appellant’s September 30, 2022 “Rule 9.400(b) motion to recover contractual appellate attorney’s fees from appellee Nantucket” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF PENDING UNDECIDED FEE AND SANCTIONS MOTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Authored Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted in Part/Denied in Part
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant in Part/Deny in Part ~ Ordered that appellees’ May 21, 2023 motion to strike notices of supplemental authority is granted as to notices filed on March 2, 2023, May 10, 2023, and May 17, 2023. A Notice of Supplemental Authority cannot be used to raise new issues nor to contain argument, which these notices do. The motion is denied as to the remaining notices of supplemental authority.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
Deny Consolidation ~ Upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s December 23, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s December 22, 2022 motion to consolidate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS 4D22-3390 AS NOTICE PENDING MOTIONS ARE RIPE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar Case Pending ~ W/4D22-3390
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Ord-Denying Leave to file Reply ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 2, 2022 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF INCORRECT FILING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (INCORRECT FILING- SEE CORRECTED RESPONSE FILED)PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Nantucket Enterprises
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Confidential Information Within Court Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Deny EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s November 7, 2022 motion for an extension of time or abatement of appellant's sanction motion is denied. The Court accepts Nantucket Enterprise, Inc.’s adoption of “the arguments raised by the other Appellees in the October 26, 2022, filing entitled Appellee's and Counsel's Response in Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Sanctions” as its response. Nantucket Enterprise, Inc. may file an additional response that does not restate the arguments raised by the other appellees within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ ORABATEMENT OF APPELLANTS' SANCTIONS MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership ("PB Hotel"), and its counsel Timothy W. Schulz
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions ~ AGAINST APPELLEE NANTUCKET AND ITS COUNSEL ALAN ROSE AND GREGG WEISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO PALM BEACH HOTEL MOT. FOR ATTY. FEES.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ **RESPONSE FILED** NANTUCKET
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-29
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (234 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 13, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s July 13, 2022 motion to supplement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Joinder in Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Joinder ~ OF APPELLEE, NANTUCKET, IN PB HOTEL'SAMENDED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOAPPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ **AMENDED RESPONSE FILED** IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'SMOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion for Clarification ~ OR MODIFY APPELLATE STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion For Review ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s June 16, 2022 response and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s June 21, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s June 15, 2022 “Rule 9.310(f) Motion for Review of Trial Court June 10, 2022 Order Denying Rule 9.310(A) Motion” is denied. Further, upon consideration of appellees’ June 24, 2022 Joint Response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s June 22, 2022 “Motion to Exceed Rule 9.210(A)(2)(B) Limits, Motion to the Supplement Record on Appeal, Motion for Judicial Notice and Motion for Extension of Time” is denied, save for appellant’s request to supplement the record, which is denied without prejudice to appellant refiling a motion to supplement the record which specifically lists what was omitted from the record and what it seeks to supplement the record with. Appellant shall file the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice. Further,ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A. is again cautioned against excessive and unnecessary motion practice, and advised that continued excessive and unnecessary motion practice may subject appellant to sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO EXCEED RULE 9.210(a)(2)(B) LIMITS, MOTION TO THE SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL, MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REVIEW
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Motion For Review
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (846 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ 486 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's April 25, 2022 order is amended to add the Clerk of the Circuit Court: Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 7, 2022 “Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe,” it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further,ORDERED that appellees’ April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 1, 2022 “Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions” is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and part. The material requeste
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 7, 2022 “Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe,” it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, ORDERED that appellees’ April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 1, 2022 “Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions” is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and Procured through Improper Draconian and Subsequently Stayed Bench Warrants Requested by the Parties and Their Counsel. See Fla.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC., RESPONSE TO MARAIST'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Motion Supplemental Record & Eot For Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Withdraw as Counsel ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 14, 2022 response and appellant’s March 15, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Bresky Law’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted. Patrick Maraist, Esq. is the appellate counsel for appellant. See Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So. 2d 489, 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“[W]hile Florida courts lack the authority to suspend an attorney from the practice of law, they possess the inherent contempt power to sanction an attorney by the removal of that attorney as counsel in the case in which the conduct occurred.”). Further, upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s March 7, 2022 response, it isORDERED that appellant’s March 7, 2022 “Motion for Order to Allow Co-Counsel for Appellant to Withdraw as Counsel” is denied as moot. Further, upon consideration of appellant's March 16, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s March 1, 2022 motion/request for judicial notice is granted.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-09
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Ord-Denying Clarification ~ Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s February 14, 2022 response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s February 15, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s February 14, 2022 motion for clarification is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| Description |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ MARAIST LAW FIRM
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion for Clarification
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
Order Vacated ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s February 8, 2022 response and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's February 8, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant's February 3, 2022 motion for rehearing is granted. This court's January 31, 2022 order is vacated. Further, ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s January 7, 2022 jurisdictional brief, appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 11, 2022 amended response, and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s January 12, 2022 amended response, this appeal shall proceed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h), 9.130(h); Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 1976). Further, upon consideration of appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 motion to consolidate is granted, and the above–styled case numbers are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, upon consideration of appellant’s February 3, 2022 motion for rehearing, which this court treats as a response to Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 28, 2022 motion for temporary stay, it is ORDERED that appellee’s motion for temporary stay is denied. Per this court's December 22, 2021 order, a stay has been granted to the extent necessary to enforce the automatic stay obtained pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1). Further, upon consideration of the appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 request for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant's February 3, 2022 request for stay is denied as moot. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.310(b)(1).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ AMENDED TRIAL COURTORDER OF FEBRUARY 4, ACCELERATING THE CRITICAL DATEFOR THE TIME-SENSITIVE FEBRUARY 3 MOTION FORRECONSIDERATION AND STAY OF CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's January 31, 2022 order is amended as follows: ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s January 7, 2022 jurisdictional brief, appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 11, 2022 amended response, and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s January 12, 2022 amended response, this appeal shall proceed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h), 9.130(h); Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 1976). Further, upon consideration of appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 motion to consolidate is granted, and the above–styled case numbers are now consolidated and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 28, 2022 motion for temporary stay is granted, and this appeal is stayed pending entry of the final order that is the subject of the trial court’s February 11, 2022 hearing. Further, upon consideration of the appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it isORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 request for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the entry of the final order subject to the February 11, 2022 hearing. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Order Appealed
|
| Description |
Order Appealed ~ Order Denying Motion for Rehearing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A. VS PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
4D2021-3580
|
2021-12-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502008CA039646
|
Parties
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
9999-02-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous (DNU) ~ ***4D21-2871, 4D21-3579 AND 4D21-3580 ARE CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SEE 4D21-2871 FOR ALL FUTURE DOCKET ENTRIES.***
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-14387 Supreme Court Order Dismissed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
JOINT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion for Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE TO LATEST MOTION FOR REHEARING BY APPELLANT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION OF NOVEMBER 15, 2023 ORDER GRANTING APPELLEES' MOTION REQUEST FOR POST JUDGMENT INTEREST
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-1437 Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CORRECTED PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND APPENDIX IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM APPELLANT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-14
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's August 23, 2023 order is amended to include the consolidated case numbers as follows: ORDERED that the appellant's August 21, 2023 motions to stay issuance of the mandate and for rehearing are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FORREHEARING AND MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC2023-1183
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate ~ PENDING RULING ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OF AUGUST 10, 2023 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISQUALIFY AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OFPROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion to Stay Issue Mandate ~ ORDERED that the appellant's August 7, 2023 motion to stay issuance of the mandate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TODISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANELAND TRANSFER THIS APPEAL TO A DIFFERENT COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellees may respond to appellant's motion to transfer filed July 27, 2023, within five (5) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ APPELLEES' JOINT NOTICE REGARDINGAPPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGEGERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA INTHESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS AND RE-ASSIGNMENT TO THETHIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Transfer
|
| Description |
Motion To Transfer To Another Court ~ AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA IN THESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 16, 2023 motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, written opinion, and clarification is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s June 16, 2023 “motion fo[r] rehearing as to June 15, 2023 appellate fee award to appellees” is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s July 17, 2023 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO APPELLEES' RESPONSES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET, RESPONSE TO MOTION FORREHEARING AS TO JUNE 15, 2023 APPELLATE FEE AWARD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'SMOTION FOR REHEARING, ET AL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ AS TO JUNE 15, 2023 APPELLATE FEE AWARD TO APPELLEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions ~ AGAINST APPELLEE NANTUCKET AND ITS COUNSEL ALAN ROSE AND GREGG WEISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Unconditionally ~ ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s August 30, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. Further,ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s August 30, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF PENDING UNDECIDED FEE AND SANCTIONS MOTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Authored Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted in Part/Denied in Part
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant in Part/Deny in Part ~ Ordered that appellees’ May 21, 2023 motion to strike notices of supplemental authority is granted as to notices filed on March 2, 2023, May 10, 2023, and May 17, 2023. A Notice of Supplemental Authority cannot be used to raise new issues nor to contain argument, which these notices do. The motion is denied as to the remaining notices of supplemental authority.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
Deny Consolidation ~ Upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s December 23, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s December 22, 2022 motion to consolidate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS 4D22-3390 AS NOTICE PENDING MOTIONS ARE RIPE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar Case Pending ~ W/4D22-3390
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Ord-Denying Leave to file Reply ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 2, 2022 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF INCORRECT FILING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (INCORRECT FILING- SEE CORRECTED RESPONSE FILED)PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Nantucket Enterprises
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Confidential Information Within Court Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Deny EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s November 7, 2022 motion for an extension of time or abatement of appellant's sanction motion is denied. The Court accepts Nantucket Enterprise, Inc.’s adoption of “the arguments raised by the other Appellees in the October 26, 2022, filing entitled Appellee's and Counsel's Response in Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Sanctions” as its response. Nantucket Enterprise, Inc. may file an additional response that does not restate the arguments raised by the other appellees within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ ORABATEMENT OF APPELLANTS' SANCTIONS MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership ("PB Hotel"), and its counsel Timothy W. Schulz
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO PALM BEACH HOTEL MOT. FOR ATTY. FEES.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ **RESPONSE FILED** NANTUCKET
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-29
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (234 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 13, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s July 13, 2022 motion to supplement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion For Review ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s June 16, 2022 response and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s June 21, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s June 15, 2022 “Rule 9.310(f) Motion for Review of Trial Court June 10, 2022 Order Denying Rule 9.310(A) Motion” is denied. Further, upon consideration of appellees’ June 24, 2022 Joint Response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s June 22, 2022 “Motion to Exceed Rule 9.210(A)(2)(B) Limits, Motion to the Supplement Record on Appeal, Motion for Judicial Notice and Motion for Extension of Time” is denied, save for appellant’s request to supplement the record, which is denied without prejudice to appellant refiling a motion to supplement the record which specifically lists what was omitted from the record and what it seeks to supplement the record with. Appellant shall file the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice. Further,ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A. is again cautioned against excessive and unnecessary motion practice, and advised that continued excessive and unnecessary motion practice may subject appellant to sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO EXCEED RULE 9.210(a)(2)(B) LIMITS, MOTION TO THE SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL, MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Motion For Review
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REVIEW
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (846 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ 486 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's April 25, 2022 order is amended to add the Clerk of the Circuit Court: Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 7, 2022 “Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe,” it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further,ORDERED that appellees’ April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 1, 2022 “Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions” is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and part. The material requeste
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 7, 2022 “Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe,” it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, ORDERED that appellees’ April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 1, 2022 “Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions” is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and Procured through Improper Draconian and Subsequently Stayed Bench Warrants Requested by the Parties and Their Counsel. See Fla.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC., RESPONSE TO MARAIST'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Motion Supplemental Record & Eot For Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ **AMENDED** IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'SMOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF CORRECTION AND CLARIFICATION TO PARAGRAPH 23 OF APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, FOR REMOVAL OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLEES and TO STRIKE APPELLEE'S MARCH 31, 2022 MOTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion for Clarification ~ OR MODIFY APPELLATE STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Withdraw as Counsel ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 14, 2022 response and appellant’s March 15, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Bresky Law’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted. Patrick Maraist, Esq. is the appellate counsel for appellant. See Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So. 2d 489, 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“[W]hile Florida courts lack the authority to suspend an attorney from the practice of law, they possess the inherent contempt power to sanction an attorney by the removal of that attorney as counsel in the case in which the conduct occurred.”). Further, upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s March 7, 2022 response, it isORDERED that appellant’s March 7, 2022 “Motion for Order to Allow Co-Counsel for Appellant to Withdraw as Counsel” is denied as moot. Further, upon consideration of appellant's March 16, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s March 1, 2022 motion/request for judicial notice is granted.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-09
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Ord-Denying Clarification ~ Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s February 14, 2022 response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s February 15, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s February 14, 2022 motion for clarification is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| Description |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ MARAIST LAW FIRM
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion for Clarification
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
Order Vacated ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s February 8, 2022 response and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's February 8, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant's February 3, 2022 motion for rehearing is granted. This court's January 31, 2022 order is vacated. Further, ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s January 7, 2022 jurisdictional brief, appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 11, 2022 amended response, and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s January 12, 2022 amended response, this appeal shall proceed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h), 9.130(h); Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 1976). Further, upon consideration of appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 motion to consolidate is granted, and the above–styled case numbers are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, upon consideration of appellant’s February 3, 2022 motion for rehearing, which this court treats as a response to Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 28, 2022 motion for temporary stay, it is ORDERED that appellee’s motion for temporary stay is denied. Per this court's December 22, 2021 order, a stay has been granted to the extent necessary to enforce the automatic stay obtained pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1). Further, upon consideration of the appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 request for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant's February 3, 2022 request for stay is denied as moot. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.310(b)(1).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ AMENDED TRIAL COURTORDER OF FEBRUARY 4, ACCELERATING THE CRITICAL DATEFOR THE TIME-SENSITIVE FEBRUARY 3 MOTION FORRECONSIDERATION AND STAY OF CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's January 31, 2022 order is amended as follows: ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s January 7, 2022 jurisdictional brief, appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 11, 2022 amended response, and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s January 12, 2022 amended response, this appeal shall proceed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h), 9.130(h); Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 1976). Further, upon consideration of appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 motion to consolidate is granted, and the above–styled case numbers are now consolidated and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 28, 2022 motion for temporary stay is granted, and this appeal is stayed pending entry of the final order that is the subject of the trial court’s February 11, 2022 hearing. Further, upon consideration of the appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it isORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 request for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the entry of the final order subject to the February 11, 2022 hearing. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ ***AMENDED*** PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's January 11, 2022 response and appendix to response are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificates of service do not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-11
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response ~ **STRICKEN** PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-11
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s AMENDED response to appellant's statement on jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the December 17, 2021 order is an appealable nonfinal order and how the December 21, 2021 order is an appealable nonfinal order, as it appears to deny a motion for rehearing of a nonfinal order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a); Fla. Highway Patrol v. Jackson, 288 So. 3d 1179 (Fla. 2020) (holding that Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 contains an exclusive list of appealable orders); Agere Sys. Inc. v. All Am. Crating, Inc., 931 So. 2d 244, 245 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) ("An order that simply denies a motion for rehearing of an underlying nonfinal order, is not itself an appealable order."). Further,Appellees may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate ~ w/ 21-2871 and 21-3579
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Order Appealed
|
| Description |
Order Appealed ~ Order on Attempted Purge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A., Appellant(s) v. NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC., PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee(s).
|
4D2021-2871
|
2021-10-07
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502008CA039646
|
Parties
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W. Maraist
|
|
| Name |
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Gregory Scott Weiss, Alan Benjamin Rose, Timothy W. Schulz
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Howard Coates, Jr.
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
9999-02-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous (DNU) ~ ***4D21-2871 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580 AND 22-900 ARE CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SEE 4D21-2871 FOR ALL FUTURE DOCKET ENTRIES.***
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-07
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-14387 Supreme Court Order Dismissed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
JOINT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion for Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE TO LATEST MOTION FOR REHEARING BY APPELLANT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-12-01
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION OF NOVEMBER 15, 2023 ORDER GRANTING APPELLEES' MOTION REQUEST FOR POST JUDGMENT INTEREST
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-11-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
SC2023-1437 Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CORRECTED PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND APPENDIX IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
Appendix to Motion
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-10-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES FROM APPELLANT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-15
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-14
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's August 23, 2023 order is amended to include the consolidated case numbers as follows: ORDERED that the appellant's August 21, 2023 motions to stay issuance of the mandate and for rehearing are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion to Stay Issue Mandate ~ ORDERED that the appellant's August 21, 2023 motions to stay issuance of the mandate and for rehearing are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC2023-1183
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ APPELLEES' JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FORREHEARING AND MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ OF AUGUST 10, 2023 ORDERS DENYING MOTION AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF SERVICE OF PETITION FOR WRIT OFPROHIBITION IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion to Stay Issue Mandate ~ ORDERED that the appellant's August 7, 2023 motion to stay issuance of the mandate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ JOINT RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TODISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANELAND TRANSFER THIS APPEAL TO A DIFFERENT COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellees may respond to appellant's motion to transfer filed July 27, 2023, within five (5) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ APPELLEES' JOINT NOTICE REGARDINGAPPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Transfer
|
| Description |
Motion To Transfer To Another Court ~ AND MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE GERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA IN THESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY JUDGEGERBER AND THE APPELLATE PANEL WHICH ISSUED THE PCA INTHESE CONSOLIDATED APPEALS AND RE-ASSIGNMENT TO THETHIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing En Banc ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 16, 2023 motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, written opinion, and clarification is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s June 16, 2023 “motion fo[r] rehearing as to June 15, 2023 appellate fee award to appellees” is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s July 17, 2023 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO APPELLEES' RESPONSES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET, RESPONSE TO MARAIST'SMOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, ISSUANCEOF A WRITTEN OPINION, AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'SMOTION FOR REHEARING AS TO JUNE 15, 2023APPELLATE FEE AWARD TO APPELLEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ AS TO JUNE 15, 2023 APPELLATE FEE AWARD TO APPELLEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Unconditionally ~ ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s August 30, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. Further,ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s August 30, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF PENDING UNDECIDED FEE AND SANCTIONS MOTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-08
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted in Part/Denied in Part
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant in Part/Deny in Part ~ Ordered that appellees’ May 21, 2023 motion to strike notices of supplemental authority is granted as to notices filed on March 2, 2023, May 10, 2023, and May 17, 2023. A Notice of Supplemental Authority cannot be used to raise new issues nor to contain argument, which these notices do. The motion is denied as to the remaining notices of supplemental authority.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Consolidate
|
| Description |
Deny Consolidation ~ Upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s December 23, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s December 22, 2022 motion to consolidate is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS 4D22-3390 AS NOTICE PENDING MOTIONS ARE RIPE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar Case Pending ~ W/4D22-3390
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Ord-Denying Leave to file Reply ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 2, 2022 motion for leave to file reply is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF INCORRECT FILING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (CORRECTED RESPONSE)Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Nantucket Enterprises
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Confidential Information Within Court Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Deny EOT to file Response ~ ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s November 7, 2022 motion for an extension of time or abatement of appellant's sanction motion is denied. The Court accepts Nantucket Enterprise, Inc.’s adoption of “the arguments raised by the other Appellees in the October 26, 2022, filing entitled Appellee's and Counsel's Response in Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Sanctions” as its response. Nantucket Enterprise, Inc. may file an additional response that does not restate the arguments raised by the other appellees within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ ORABATEMENT OF APPELLANTS' SANCTIONS MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership ("PB Hotel"), and its counsel Timothy W. Schulz
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions ~ AGAINST APPELLEE HOTEL AND ITS COUNSEL TIMOTHY SCHULZ
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO PALM BEACH HOTEL MOT. FOR ATTY. FEES.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-30
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ **RESPONSE FILED** Palm Beach Florida Hotel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-29
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (234 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 13, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to appellant’s July 13, 2022 motion to supplement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Joinder in Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Joinder ~ OF APPELLEE, NANTUCKET, IN PB HOTEL'SAMENDED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOAPPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-31
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion for Clarification ~ OR MODIFY APPELLATE STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that appellee’s October 7, 2021 motion to strike is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion For Review ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s June 16, 2022 response and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s June 21, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s June 15, 2022 “Rule 9.310(f) Motion for Review of Trial Court June 10, 2022 Order Denying Rule 9.310(A) Motion” is denied. Further, upon consideration of appellees’ June 24, 2022 Joint Response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s June 22, 2022 “Motion to Exceed Rule 9.210(A)(2)(B) Limits, Motion to the Supplement Record on Appeal, Motion for Judicial Notice and Motion for Extension of Time” is denied, save for appellant’s request to supplement the record, which is denied without prejudice to appellant refiling a motion to supplement the record which specifically lists what was omitted from the record and what it seeks to supplement the record with. Appellant shall file the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice. Further,ORDERED that appellant Maraist Law Firm, P.A. is again cautioned against excessive and unnecessary motion practice, and advised that continued excessive and unnecessary motion practice may subject appellant to sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO EXCEED RULE 9.210(a)(2)(B) LIMITS, MOTION TO THE SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL, MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR REVIEW
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Motion For Review
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (846 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ 486 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's April 25, 2022 order is amended to add the Clerk of the Circuit Court: Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 7, 2022 “Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe,” it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further,ORDERED that appellees’ April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 1, 2022 “Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions” is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and part. The material requeste
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s April 5, 2022 Joint Response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.'s April 7, 2022 "Notice of Compliance with April 4, 2022 Order and Attachment of Trial Court Order Denying the Motion for Rehearing Rendering Motion to Consolidate Ripe," it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.'s April 4, 2022 Motion to Consolidate is granted, and case numbers 4D21-2871, 4D21-3579, 4D21-3580, and 4D22-900 are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, ORDERED that appellees' April 5, 2022 joint request to shorten the briefing schedule is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Maraist Law Firm, P.A.'s April 4, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s March 31, 2022 Motion for Clarification or Modify Appellate Stay is granted in part as to the request for clarification and denied in part as to the request for modification. This court clarifies that there was an automatic stay of the money judgment orders per Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1) and a stay of the writ of bodily attachment that were the subject of the contempt proceedings. This court did not impose a stay of the prevailing party fee proceedings between Nantucket Enterprises, Inc. and Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 4, 2022 Amended Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s April 4, 2022 Notice of Joinder with said Amended Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.'s April 1, 2022 "Motion for Order to Show Cause, for Removal of Counsel for Appellees and to Strike Appellee's March 31, 2022 Motions" is denied. Further, Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 5, 2022 Response and Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s April 7, 2022 Response, it is ORDERED that Maraist Law Firm, P.A.'s April 5, 2022 Motion to Supplement Record on Appeal is granted in part and denied in part. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal except for the following materials: Docket Entry 3242: January 14, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3255: February 1, 2022 Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3256: February 2, 2022 Subpoena Served on Maraist; Docket Entry 3269: February 24, 2022 Notice of Postponement of Deposition; Docket Entry 3271: March 7, 2022 Re-Notice of Taking Deposition; Docket Entry 3280: March 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Affidavit of Process Server; Docket Entry 3291: March 18, 2022 Supplemental Proffer through Notice of Filing Business Record Emails from December 3, 2021, through December 12, 2021, from Appellees' Counsels to Donnie Murrell and to Judge Coates Without Copy to Patrick Maraist; Docket Entry 3299: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol I; Docket Entry 3300: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge December 2021 Vol II; Docket Entry 3301: April 2, 2022 Notice of Filing Correspondence to/from the Trial Judge January-March 2022; Docket Entry 3302: April 4, 2022 Notice of Filing Documents Correspondence Exhibits Related to the Alan Rose and Timothy Schulz Manufactured Contempt, Bench Warrant and Removal of Patrick Maraist as Counsel for Maraist Law Firm December 2021; and Docket Entry 3298: April 1, 2022 Notice of Filing Nantucket's Three Re-Notice of Depositions of Maraist's Specifically Designated to Include upon Protected Confidential and Financial Records at Issue on the Pending Final Appeal and Procured through Improper Draconian and Subsequently Stayed Bench Warrants Requested by the Parties and Their Counsel. See Fla.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC., RESPONSE TO MARAIST'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-05
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Motion Supplemental Record & Eot For Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CLARIFY SCOPE OF STAY OR TO MODIFY STAY ORDERS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Withdraw as Counsel ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s March 14, 2022 response and appellant’s March 15, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Bresky Law’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted. Patrick Maraist, Esq. is the appellate counsel for appellant. See Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So. 2d 489, 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (“[W]hile Florida courts lack the authority to suspend an attorney from the practice of law, they possess the inherent contempt power to sanction an attorney by the removal of that attorney as counsel in the case in which the conduct occurred.”). Further, upon consideration of appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s March 7, 2022 response, it isORDERED that appellant’s March 7, 2022 “Motion for Order to Allow Co-Counsel for Appellant to Withdraw as Counsel” is denied as moot. Further, upon consideration of appellant's March 16, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s March 1, 2022 motion/request for judicial notice is granted.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-09
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Ord-Denying Clarification ~ Upon consideration of Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s February 14, 2022 response and Maraist Law Firm, P.A.’s February 15, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s February 14, 2022 motion for clarification is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| Description |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ MARAIST LAW FIRM
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion for Clarification
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
Order Vacated ~ Upon consideration of appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s February 8, 2022 response and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's February 8, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellant's February 3, 2022 motion for rehearing is granted. This court's January 31, 2022 order is vacated. Further, ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s January 7, 2022 jurisdictional brief, appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 11, 2022 amended response, and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s January 12, 2022 amended response, this appeal shall proceed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h), 9.130(h); Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 1976). Further, upon consideration of appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 motion to consolidate is granted, and the above–styled case numbers are now consolidated for all purposes and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, upon consideration of appellant’s February 3, 2022 motion for rehearing, which this court treats as a response to Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s January 28, 2022 motion for temporary stay, it is ORDERED that appellee’s motion for temporary stay is denied. Per this court's December 22, 2021 order, a stay has been granted to the extent necessary to enforce the automatic stay obtained pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1). Further, upon consideration of the appellees’ December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 27, 2021 request for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant's February 3, 2022 request for stay is denied as moot. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.310(b)(1).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ AMENDED TRIAL COURTORDER OF FEBRUARY 4, ACCELERATING THE CRITICAL DATEFOR THE TIME-SENSITIVE FEBRUARY 3 MOTION FORRECONSIDERATION AND STAY OF CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-20
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-20
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ **STRICKEN** OF APPELLANT'S NON-COMPLIANCE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-20
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee's October 20, 2021 notice is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar Case Pending
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ **VACATED**ORDERED that this court's January 31, 2022 order is amended as follows: ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's January 7, 2022 jurisdictional brief, appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s January 11, 2022 amended response, and appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's January 12, 2022 amended response, this appeal shall proceed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(h), 9.130(h); Clearwater Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Sampson, 336 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 1976). Further, upon consideration of appellees' December 28, 2021 joint response, it is ORDERED that appellant's December 27, 2021 motion to consolidate is granted, and the above-styled case numbers are now consolidated and are to proceed under the time schedule for a final appeal and according to the requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, and shall proceed under case number 4D21-2871. Further, ORDERED that appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.'s January 28, 2022 motion for temporary stay is granted, and this appeal is stayed pending entry of the final order that is the subject of the trial court's February 11, 2022 hearing. Further, upon consideration of the appellees' December 28, 2021 joint response, it isORDERED that appellant's December 27, 2021 request for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the entry of the final order subject to the February 11, 2022 hearing. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| Description |
Motion To Consolidate
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Grant Stay ~ ORDERED that this court’s December 13, 2021 order is vacated in light of the circuit court’s Amended and Superseding Writ of Bodily Attachment. Further, upon consideration of the appellees’ December 14, 2021 responses, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 13, 2021 renewed motion to stay and urgent motion for reconsideration is granted to the extent necessary to enforce the automatic stay obtained pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1). Further, ORDERED that the circuit court's Amended and Superseding Writ of Bodily Attachment directing the Sheriff to take Attorney Patrick Maraist into custody is stayed pending further order of this court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ **CORRECTED** PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ AND URGENT MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Grant Stay ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 13, 2021 renewed motion to stay and urgent motion for reconsideration is granted to the extent necessary to enforce the automatic stay obtained pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(1). Further, ORDERED that the circuit court's Writ of Bodily Attachment directing the Sheriff to take Attorney Patrick Maraist into custody is stayed pending further order of this court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ **CORRECTED RESPONSE FILED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s November 30, 2021 motion to stay is denied. Further, upon consideration of appellee’s December 1, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s December 1, 2021 emergency motion to stay is denied. An automatic stay of the August 22, 2021 order has been obtained. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.310(b)(1). Further, upon consideration of appellee’s December 1, 2021 response, it isORDERED that appellant’s December 1, 2021 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s December 2, 2021 motion for leave for this court to consider reply is denied as unauthorized.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ FOR COURT TO CONSIDER THIS REPLY TO APPELLEES RESPONSE TO AMENDED MOTION TO STAY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING FINALITY OF APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ AMENDED **EMERGENCY**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Denying Request for Emergency Treatment ~ ORDERED that the appellant’s December 1, 2021 request for emergency treatment is denied. The court will handle the filing in the normal course of business. No motion for rehearing as to this order will be entertained.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-30
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal Confidential
|
| Description |
Confidential Records ~ (101 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s October 20, 2021 jurisdictional brief, appellee Palm Beach Hotel & Office Building Limited Partnership’s October 21, 2021 response, and appellee Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.’s October 26, 2021 response, this appeal shall proceed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the August 22, 2021 order is a final appealable order, as it states "all such monies will be held in the trust account of one or both of the parties' counsel, or deposited into the Court registry at the Parties' option, pending further order of this Court," indicating further judicial labor. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974) (“Generally, the test employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected.”). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Maraist Law Firm, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-07
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
|
|
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC. VS MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
4D2020-2212
|
2020-10-13
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Certiorari
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502019CA004904XXXXMB AJ
|
Parties
| Name |
MRACHEK,FITZGERALD,ROSE,KONOPKA, THOMAS & WEISS, P.A.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Michael W. Kranz, Alan Benjamin Rose, Gregory Scott Weiss
|
|
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W. Maraist
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Scott Ryan Kerner
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2020-12-23
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-23
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Order Denying Petition for Writ - Certiorari ~ ORDERED that the October 13, 2020 petition for writ of certiorari is denied.DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition ~ FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-13
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Writ of Certiorari / Acknowledgment letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-13
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Certiorari
|
| Description |
Petition for Certiorari Filed ~ FILING FEE PAID ELECTRONICALLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Nantucket Enterprises, Inc.
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A. VS BRUCE FILASKI, et al.
|
4D2019-3470
|
2019-11-08
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502018CA000757MB
|
Parties
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W. Maraist
|
|
| Name |
ROBERT ABRUZZO
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
STEPHEN DONAHUE
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
ANTHONY GIACOMAGGIO
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
BRUCE FILASKI
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
David I. Shiner, Ryon M. McCabe, Robert Cartwright Glass, Stratton A. Smiley
|
|
| Name |
Hon. James Nutt
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2020-04-27
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the April 24, 2020 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-27
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
| Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-25
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 147 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
BRUCE FILASKI
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-25
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Motion Supplemental Record & Eot For Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that this court’s January 24, 2020 order to show cause is discharged; further,ORDERED that appellant's January 24, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before February 3, 2020, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ (1734 PAGES)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-08
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 25, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Ord-Supplement ROA & Toll Time for Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellees' March 5, 2020 response, it is ORDERED that appellant's February 25, 2020 "rule 9.200 motion to supplement the appellate record with two hearing transcripts needed for initial brief challen[g]ing order denying intervention and incorporated request for extension of time of ten days to file the initial brief upon completion of supplementation" is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process. Further, ORDERED that the time for filing appellant's initial brief is tolled until ten (10) days after the supplemental record is received.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-24
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ *AND* MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A. VS PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
4D2019-3295
|
2019-10-23
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502008CA039646
|
Parties
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2020-05-18
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the May 14, 2020 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed. Further, Upon consideration of appellant's May 15, 2020 response, it is ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership's April 27, 2020 "motion for court-imposed sanctions" is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-18
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-15
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-14
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
| Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's April 20, 2020 response, this court's April 20, 2020 order to show cause is discharged. Further, Upon consideration of appellees' April 20, 2020 and April 21, 2020 responses in opposition, it is ORDERED that appellant's April 20, 2020 motion for extension of time of thirty (30) days to file the initial brief is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within on or before May 15, 2020. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Sanctions
|
| Description |
Motion for sanctions
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (Nantucket Enterprises) IN OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-20
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL...) IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellee's April 16, 2020 notice and appellant's April 17, 2020 response, this court notes that the initial brief was due to be filed on or before April 16, 2020 pursuant to this court's February 4, 2020 and March 3, 2020 orders. Therefore, it is ORDERED that appellant in the above–styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above–styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ 176 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF DEADLINE TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Order Denying Stay ~ Upon consideration of appellee's, Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, March 18, 2020 response and appellee's, Nantucket Enterprises, Inc., March 19, 2020 response, it is ORDERED that appellant's March 17, 2020 motion to stay/abate this appeal is denied. Further, ORDERED that appellant's motion for rehearing of this court's March 3, 2020 order, contained in paragraph 11 of appellant's motion to stay/abate this appeal, is denied. Further, ORDERED that appellant's March 30, 2020 motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing of this court's March 30, 2020 order is denied as moot. Further, appellant is cautioned that excessive motion practice could result in the imposition of sanctions. See Dubowitz v. Century Village East, Inc., 381 So. 2d 252, 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (“This Court is being deluged nowadays with a plethora of pleadings which have no place in any appellate court and which are causing a distressing waste of time. We are in truth suffering from acute motion sickness.”).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-30
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING INTERIM
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO STAY/ABATE (NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO STAY/ABATE (PB HOTEL)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-17
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ /ABATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ Upon consideration of appellant’s January 22, 2020 response and appellee, Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s, February 4, 2020 reply, it is ORDERED that appellee’s January 7, 2020 motion to strike is denied. Further,Upon consideration of appellee, Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s, January 21, 2020 response and appellant’s February 19, 2020 reply, it is ORDERED that appellant’s February 19, 2020 reply is treated as an amended motion to supplement and is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 511 So. 2d 593, 595 n.3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s January 21, 2020 motion to supplement the record is denied as moot. Further,Upon consideration of appellees’ January 30, 2020 and February 3, 2020 responses, it is ORDERED that appellant’s January 27, 2020 “appellant’s Rule 9.310 motion tostay order on appeal denying motion for protective order requiring production of attorney client privilege, work product protected and Florida Bar protected confidential information [] trial proceedings” is denied. See Banks v. State, 46 So. 3d 989, 997 (Fla. 2010) (“Under the abuse of discretion standard of review, a ruling will be upheld unless the ruling is ‘arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, which is another way of saying that discretion is abused only where no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.’”). Further,Upon consideration of appellee, Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s, January 28, 2020 response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s January 28, 2020 unopposed “appellant’s corrected (with service on trial clerk) rule 9.200(F)(1) motion to correct an erroneous trial clerk omission from the instructions to the record on appeal with incorporated motion for extension of time pending resolution of the motion” is granted. The September 20, 2019 “under seal of clerk of court verified emergency motion to continue all hearings for no less than 30 days (up through and including October 21, 2019)” attached to appellant’s January 28, 2020 motion as exhibit “A” shall be included in the record on appeal and shall be considered filed as of the date of this order. This court notes that the request for a thirty (30) day extension of time in appellant’s January 28, 2020 motion was previously granted in this court’s February 4, 2020 order. Further,Upon consideration of appellee, Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s, February 4, 2020 response, it is ORDERED that appellant’s February 3, 2020 “appellant’s motion for leave to file a reply to appellees’ responses in opposition to rule 9.310 motion to stay order on appeal” is denied. Further,ORDERED that appellee, Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership’s, motion to strike appellant’s amended and supplemental reply is denied. Further,ORDERED that “appellant’s amended and supplemental reply in support of January 21, 2020 motion to supplement the appellate record in compliance with February 4, 2020 order” is treated as an amended motion to supplement and is granted. The September 25 and 26, 2019 hearing transcripts requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 511 So. 2d 593, 595 n.3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Appellant shall monitor the supplementation process. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s March 2, 2020 “second motion to supplement the appellate record on appeal with hearing transcripts with incorporated motion for extension of time” is d
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-02
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Motion Supplemental Record & Eot For Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
Reply ~ "AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL"
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Reply to Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Upon consideration of appellee's January 7, 2020 motion to strike and appellant's January 22, 2020 response, it isORDERED that, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, appellee shall file a reply to appellant's response to the motion to strike and specifically delineate, in line-item fashion, the record page number of the document they seek to strike, the date that document was before the trial court (not to be confused with the date the document was filed in the circuit court docket), and the basis for striking that specific document. Further,Upon consideration of appellant's January 21, 2020 motion to supplement the record and motion requesting an extension of time to file the initial brief and appellees' January 21, 2020 and January 23, 2020 responses, it isORDERED that, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file a reply to the motion to supplement and specifically delineate, in line-item fashion, the lower tribunal docket entry number of the document they seek to add to the record, the date that document was before the trial court (not to be confused with the date the document was filed in the circuit court docket), and the basis for adding that specific document to the record. Rosenberg v. Rosenberg, 511 So. 2d 593, 595 n.3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) ("Appellate review is limited to the record as made before the trial court at the time of the entry of a final judgment or orders complained of."). Further, ORDERED that the time for filing the initial brief shall be extended thirty (30) days from the date this court enters an order on appellant's January 21, 2020 motion to supplement or appellee's January 7, 2020 motion to strike, whichever is later.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO RULE 9.310 MOTION TO STAY ORDER ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-03
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 27, 2020 “Motion to Correct An Erroneous Trial Clerk Omission from the Instructions to the Record On Appeal with Incorporated Motion for Extension of Time Pending Resolution of the Motion” is stricken without prejudice to refiling for failure to serve the motion on the clerk of the lower tribunal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-28
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Amend/Correct Record
|
| Description |
Motion To Correct the Record ~ **CORRECTED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO CORRECT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ ***STRICKEN 1/28/2020*** MOTION TO CORRECT AN ERRONEOUS TRIAL CLERK OMISSION FROM THE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE RECORD ON APPEAL WITH INCORPORATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (NANTUCKET ENTERPRISES, INC.) TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-21
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-21
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Motion Supplemental Record & Eot For Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellees' January 3, 2020 responses, it isORDERED that appellant's December 26, 2019 "motion for extension of time to file initial brief to prepare/supplement record on appeal" is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. If appellant wants to supplement the record on appeal, appellant must timely move this court with a specific request as to the material appellant requests to be included in the record on appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (PALM BEACH FLORIDA HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP) TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Florida Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-26
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ TO PREPARE/SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 5412 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal - see the court's website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-25
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-25
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
|
|
T.J. FISHER VS PATRICK W. MARAIST and MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
4D2017-0964
|
2017-04-03
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502016CA010130MB
|
Parties
| Name |
TAMARA FISHER
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Patrick W. Maraist
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Donald W. Hafele
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2017-05-05
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Order Denying Petition for Writ - Prohib. ~ ORDERED that the April 3, 2017 petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-05-05
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reinstatement
|
| Description |
ORD-Reinstatement ~ ORDERED that this court's order issued April 21, 2017 is vacated and this case is reinstated; further,ORDERED that upon consideration of petitioner's April 11, 2017 affidavit the filing fee is waived.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-21
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-No Filing Fee ~ **REINSTATED** ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for nonpayment of the $300.00 filing fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-21
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk ~ **REINSTATED**
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-11
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Affidavit
|
| Description |
Affidavit ~ OF INDIGENT STATUS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-03
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
TAMARA FISHER
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-03
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Original Proceeding ~ The $300.00 filing fee or affidavit of indigency in conformance with sections 57.081 and 57.085, Florida Statutes, did not accompany the petition as required in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE PETITION IS SUBSEQUENTLY VOLUNTARILY DISMISSED OR ADVERSELY DISMISSED.ORDERED sua sponte that the $300.00 filing fee or affidavit of indigency in conformance with section 57.081 and 57.085, Florida Statutes, must be filed in this Court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the petition has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the petition is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: No extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until this filing fee is paid or until an affidavit of indigency is filed and indigency status is granted.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Petition
|
| Description |
Appendix to Petition
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-04-03
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Prohibition / Acknowledgment letter
|
|
|
|
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A. VS ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
4D2013-0707
|
2013-02-21
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502007CA018213XXXXMB
|
Parties
| Name |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Patrick W. Maraist
|
|
| Name |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Gregory W. Coleman, Fred Haddad, Allison J. Davis, Louis M. Silber
|
|
| Name |
ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
MORTON B. MORGAN
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. John S. Kastrenakes
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DAVID CROW (DNU)
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2014-03-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Closed
|
| Description |
Case Closed (No Record)
|
|
| Docket Date |
2014-02-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellant's second corrected motion filed January 27, 2014, for rehearing of January 9, 2014 dismissal of appeal as moot and denying appellant's fees motion is hereby denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2014-01-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2014-01-27
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing ~ ("SECOND CORRECTED") (DENIED 2/7/14)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2014-01-24
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing ~ (SECOND CORRECTED MOTION FILED 1/27/14)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2014-01-09
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ AS MOOT.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2014-01-09
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissal ~ On its own motion, this court has reviewed: (1) Appellee's Notice of Settlement of the Underlying Circuit Court Action filed September 9, 2013, which suggested this appeal was moot; (2) Appellant's response filed September 19, 2013; and (3) the record as a whole. Based on this court's review, this appeal is dismissed as moot; further, ORDERED that appellant's Rule 9.400(b) motion filed May 1, 2013, for entitlement to recover from appellee and/or its counsel under a previously filed Fla. Stat. Sec. 57.105 motion or under the Court's inherent authority the attorneys' fees appellant has incurred, etc., is hereby denied; further, ORDERED that appellant's Rule 9.400(b) motion filed May 3, 2013, for entitlement to recover from appellee and/or its counsel pursuant to appellant's May 3, 2013 Fla. Stat. Section 57.105 motion against plaintiff, Jefferson Morgan, Lee Weissman, Attorney Greg Coleman, Attorney Stephen Walker, the Law Firm of Burman Critton et al., Attorney Lou M. Silber, Attorney Allison Davis and the Law Firm of Silber & Davis to recover fees and damages incurred in seeking an order vacating or reversing Judge Crow's February 12, 2013, order or under the Court's inherent authority the attorneys' fees appellant has incurred in securing a reversal of Judge Crow's February 12, 2013 order is hereby denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-10-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Grant Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that the appellee's motion filed October 7, 2013, to strike reply brief and request for oral argument as untimely is granted, and the reply brief of appellant and appellant's request for oral argument filed October 3, 2013, are hereby stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-10-08
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE REPLY BRIEF, ETC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-10-07
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike ~ REPLY BRIEF AND REQUEST FOR OA AS UNTIMELY (GRANTED 10/17/13)
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-10-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument ~ **STRICKEN - SEE 10/17/13 ORDER** AA Patrick W. Maraist 0109185
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-10-03
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief ~ **STRICKEN - SEE 10/17/13 ORDER**
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-10-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Order Denying Stay ~ ORDERED that appellee's notice of settlement of the underlying circuit court action between the Estate of Morton B. Morgan and Anne Morgan filed September 9, 2013, is hereby noted by this Court; further, ORDERED that appellant's motion filed September 9, 2013, to stay briefing pending ruling on appellee's September 9 suggestion of mootness and alternative second motion for extension of time of 15 days to file reply brief is hereby denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-09-19
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-09-10
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-09-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ (DENIED 10/3/13) BRIEFING PENDING RULING ON AE'S 9/9/13 NOTICE WHICH SUGGESTS MOOTNESS AND ALTERNATIVE SECOND MOTION FOR EXT. OF TIME FOR REPLY BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-09-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF PENDING SETTLEMENT OF THE UNDERLYING CIRCUIT COURT ACTION *NOTED 10/3/13*
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-08-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's motion filed August 5, 2013, for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of the entry of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order said brief may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-08-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXT. OF TIME *AND* NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH RULE 9.330(A)
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-08-05
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ (GRANTED 8/15/13)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-07-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ TO ANSWER BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-07-22
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-07-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ on or before July 22, 2013.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-07-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ CORRECTED BRIEF FILED 6/24/13
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-07-12
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF CORRECTION OF DATE OF SERVICE OF AE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-07-12
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-07-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ (GRANTED 7/16/13)
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ FOR ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS TO INITIAL BRIEF FILED 6/24/13
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-24
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Corrected Appellant's Initial Brief ~ **e**
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's motion filed June 10, 2013, for extension of time to file the initial brief is granted. Said brief was filed June 12, 2013.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-13
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-12
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ TO INITIAL BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-10
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXT. OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-10
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant's third motion filed May 28, 2013, for an expedited order enforcing stay against appellee and its counsel Stephen Walker, Greg Coleman and Lou Silber and motion for an order imposing sua sponte sanctions against appellee and its counsel is hereby denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-06-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO THIRD MOTION FOR EXPEDITED ORDER ENFORCING STAY, ETC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Denying EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that the appellant's second motion filed May 17, 2013, for extension of time to file the appellant's initial brief is hereby denied. Appellant shall file the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not filed within the time provided for in this order the above-styled case may be dismissed or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-29
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ FOR AN EXPEDITED ORDER ENFORCING STAY AGAINST AE, ETC. AND FOR AN ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS, ETC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-20
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-17
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR ATTY'S FEES
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that upon consideration of appellant's response filed May 1, 2013, this court's April 22, 2013, order to show cause is hereby discharged; further,ORDERED that appellee's expedited motion filed April 19, 2013, for rehearing on April 17, 2013 order granting stay of all trial proceedings and to allow appellee an opportunity to be heard is hereby denied; further,ORDERED that appellant's motion filed April 22, 2013, to strike appellee's motion for expedited rehearing due to lack of emergency and, in the alternative, response to motion for rehearing is hereby denied; further,ORDERED that appellee's motion filed April 30, 2013, to vacate stay and dismiss appeal is hereby denied; further,ORDERED that appellant's renewed motion filed April 16, 2013, for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ PER SECTION 57.105 (DENIED 1/9/14)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-01
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ (DENIED 1/9/14)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-05-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-30
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Vacate Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Vacate Stay ~ *AND* DISMISS APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Order
|
| Description |
**DNU** ORD-From Circuit Court ~ SUPP. TO ORDER ON RULE TO SHOW CAUSE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Show Cause
|
| Description |
Order to Show Cause ~ ***DISCHARGED 5/3/13***ORDERED that appellant's motion filed April 19, 2013, for expedited ruling on motion is granted; further,ORDERED that appellant's motion to quash trial court's April 19, 2013 order setting April 23, 2013 hearing is hereby granted; further,ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause, within five (5) days, as to why, in light of reassignment of case from Judge Crow to Judge Kastrenakes, this court's April 17, 2013 stay order should not be vacated as moot and appellant's appeal should not be dismissed as moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO EXPEDITED MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-22
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike ~ EXPEDITED MOTION FOR REHEARING (AND RESPONSE TO MOTION)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-19
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order ~ *EXPEDITED* OF 4/17/13 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Expedite
|
| Description |
Motion To Expedite ~ (M) RULING ON MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXT. OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Withdraw Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-To Withdraw Pleadings ~ ORDERED that the appellant's notice of withdrawal filed April 12, 2013, is treated as a motion to withdraw pleadings and is granted, and the appellant's motion for relinquishment of jurisdiction due to recusal by trial judge and filing of motion for rehearing filed April 9, 2013 is hereby considered withdrawn.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Grant Stay ~ ORDERED that appellee's corrected motion filed March 11, 2013, to dismiss appeal is hereby denied; further,ORDERED that appellant's motion filed April 15, 2013, for expedited ruling on motion to stay is hereby granted. Appellant's motion to stay is granted and this Court stays all trial proceedings regarding appellant or its counsel until this Court can issue a ruling on the merits of this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-16
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-16
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ (M)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-12
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RELINQUISHMENT OF JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Withdraw Filing
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw Pleadings ~ (MOTION FOR RELINQUISHMENT)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction ~ T - DUE TO RECUSAL OF TRIAL JUDGE AND FILING OF MOTION FOR REHEARING.
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-04-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that the appellant's motion filed March 20, 2013, for extension of time is hereby granted, and the time in which to respond to appellee's motion to dismiss is hereby extended fifteen (15) days from the date of this order; further,ORDERED that appellant's motion filed March 7, 2013, for extension of time is hereby denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court's Notice to Attorneys and Parties, Paragraph 3.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-20
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Response ~ TO AE'S MOTION TO DISMISS. T -
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-20
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ *SUPPLEMENTAL* OF COMPLIANCE WITH 3/6/13 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-11
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ (M) (CORRECTED T- **AND** RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-11
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (M) (CORRECTED) TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION **AND** MOTION TO DISMISS T-3/21
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF MORTON B. MORGAN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF COMPLIANCE WITH 3/6/13 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
Order Requiring Amended Certificate Service
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-03-06
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-02-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ "LAW FIRM'S NOTICE AS TO 2/20/13 NOTICE OF APPEAL". STYLED IN L.T.; CERT.COPY FROM L.T. - FILED 2/20/13
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-02-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
MARAIST LAW FIRM, P.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2013-02-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
