| Docket Date |
2222-12-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ **NO AR, SEE 12/18/2020 ORDER**
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-14
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-16
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellant’s December 8, 2021 emergency motion for continuance is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-14
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Ack. Receipt from Supreme Court ~ SC21-1704
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing Interim Order ~ ORDERED that appellant’s October 25, 2021 “objection to order denying motion to appoint counsel or in the alternative motion to rehear/reconsider motion to appoint counsel” is denied. This case is perfected and will be submitted to a merits panel for consideration. Further, as appellant was advised in this court’s August 24, 2021 order, all orders of this court are stamped with the signature of the Clerk to indicate that the order issued is in fact an order of this court. The Clerk was authorized by the court to issue the October 25, 2021 order. The court notes that appellant has been prohibited from future pro se filing in this court by order in Case No. 4D21-2734 and, at this time, the prohibition has not been extended to appellant’s remaining cases in this court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Appointment of Counsel
|
| Description |
Deny Appointment of Counsel ~ ORDERED that appellant's September 21, 2021 motion to appoint counsel is denied as a party to a civil action is not guaranteed the right to counsel. See Bova v. State, 410 So. 2d 1343, 1345 (Fla. 1982) (“Right-to-counsel protections do not extend to civil parties or witnesses. . . .”); Onett v. Ahola, 780 So. 2d 979, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) ("There is no absolute right to counsel in a civil proceeding."). Further, ORDERED appellant's September 27, 2021 motion to increase word count in reply brief is granted.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-25
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing on an Order ~ OBJECTION TO ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO REHEAR/RECONSIDER MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-27
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ **GRANTED, SEE 10/25/2021 ORDER** MOTION TO INCREASE WORD COUNT IN REPLY BRIEF TO BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-24
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief ~ AS TO BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-21
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Appointment of Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion for Appointment of Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's August 16, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing Interim Order ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 20, 2021 “objection to void order” is treated as a motion for rehearing and is denied. Appellant is advised that all orders of this court are stamped with the signature of the Clerk to indicate that the order issued is in fact an order of this court. The Clerk was authorized by the court to issue the August 13, 2021 and August 17, 2021 orders. Appellant is further advised that no further filings will be accepted which are related to this court’s August 13, 2021 order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-20
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing on an Order ~ OBJECTION TO VOID ORDER WRITTEN BY ROGUE CLERK (ON AUGUST 17, 2021) NOT ELECTED TO RULE ON CASE AND WHO, BEYOND THE LEGAL INELIGIBILITY OF NOT BEING AUTHORIZED TO RULE ON CASE, OVERLOOKED FACTS PRESENTED BY APPELLANT AND THAT THE CASE STYLE IS CORRECT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing Interim Order ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 16, 2021 motion for rehearing on this Court's August 13, 2021 order is denied because appellant has failed to establish that appellees Brenda Forman and BC Clerk Employee were properly added as appellees in the above-styled case.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-16
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing on an Order ~ MOTION FOR REHEARING, RECONSIDERATION AND/OR OPINION OF ORDER GRANTING CLERKS BE REMOVED FROM CASE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-16
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Grant Miscellaneous Motion ~ ORDERED that appellees' July 19, 2021 motion is treated as a Motion to Remove Parties as Appellees and is granted. Appellees Broward County Clerk of the Court, Brenda Forman, and BC Clerk Employee will be removed as appellees in the above styled case.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-19
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ BROWARD COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, MOTION TO CORRECT CASE STYLE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-16
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ PALM BEACH COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-15
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ BROWARD COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 07/16/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-16
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellee Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections’ May 13, 2021 notice of agreed extension and notice of appearance are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificates of service do not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee Broward County Clerk of Courts' May 13, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within sixty (60) days from the current due date. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. Further,ORDERED that appellee Broward County Supervisor of Elections' May 13, 2021 notice of agreed extension is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-13
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief ~ BROWARD COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 16, 2021 motion to supplement the record is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ (PROPOSED)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-16
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-15
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Moot ~ ORDERED that appellant's April 12, 2021 “motion to have record transferred from lower court” is determined to be moot as the record on appeal was filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on April 13, 2021.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-13
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 1675 PAGES (PAGES 1-1663)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO HAVE RECORD TRANSFERRED FROM LOWER COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED sua sponte that appellant’s January 19, 2021 motion for rehearing is stricken as unauthorized.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-19
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing/Interim Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court’s December 29, 2020 order is amended as follows: ORDERED that appellant's December 28, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the current due date. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Order Denying Rehearing Interim Order ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 8, 2020 motion for rehearing is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 28, 2020 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-28
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion ~ IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion to disqualify is denied as legally insufficient as there is no cognizable basis set forth in the motion to reasonably question the impartiality of an appellate judge simply because he or she has previously presided as a trial judge over an unrelated case involving the same party. See In re Estate of Carlton, 378 So. 2d 1212, 1216-18 (Fla. 1980) (an appellate judge must determine for himself or herself the legal sufficiency of a motion to disqualify).Carlton also holds that: “Even though a suggestion for disqualification is legally insufficient, a judge may still voluntarily recuse himself if he believes it would be in the best interests for the administration of justice.” Id. at 1220. Thus, an appellate judge can also determine for himself or herself “the propriety of [voluntarily] withdrawing in any particular circumstances.” Id. at 1216.Subsequent to appellant’s filing of the motion to disqualify, she filed a motion for rehearing. Because I had presided over a homeowner’s association case as a trial judge at the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit which appellant has made several references to in her motion for rehearing filed in her appeal of her case against the Supervisor of Elections, including her claims that I could attest to the appellate panel for certain issues from her homeowner’s association case, I conclude that it would be in the best interest of the administration of justice for me to voluntarily recuse myself, sua sponte, from further participation in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED.ARTAU, J.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-12-08
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing on an Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-24
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO DISQUALIFY JUSTICE ARTAU, PURSUANT CANON 3-C
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s October 26, 2020 jurisdictional brief and appellee’s November 5, 2020 response, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to the September 22, 2020 order. This appeal shall proceed as to the September 30, 2020 order. The September 22, 2020 order is a successive order from the orders entered in July and August 2020, and the September 22, 2020 order did not contain a material change nor a new exercise of discretion of the July orders, which were final appealable orders that ended judicial labor. Hunt v. Forbes, 65 So. 3d 133, 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (ruling that noncompliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) will result in dismissal for lack of jurisdiction); Mekertin v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 869 So. 2d 1286, 1288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (stating that “where the notice of appeal is not filed within 30 days of rendition, the appellate court is precluded from exercising jurisdiction over the appeal”); Chan v. Brunswick Corp., 388 So. 2d 274, 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (“[M]ore specifically, where successive judgments are entered and the later judgment represents neither a material change of the earlier judgment nor a new exercise of discretion, the time for appeal is counted from the earlier judgment”); Drummond v. Gerwe, 264 So. 2d 474, 475 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972) (stating that where successive judgments are entered, and the latter one does not materially change the original judgment. . .the time for appeal is counted from the original judgment); See alsoFla. R. App. P. 9.110(b).GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward County Supervisor of Elections
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-26
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
|
| Description |
Determination of Indigent Status
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-20
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ **Certified Copy**
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-16
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this order appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the order entered September 22, 2020 striking the plaintiff's complaint as unauthorized and directing the clerk to re-close the case is an appealable final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110; furtherAppellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ Indigent per LT website
|
| On Behalf Of |
Christine Scott *P*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-10-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
