Search icon

CENTRAL FLORIDA FREEZER, INC. - Florida Company Profile

Company Details

Entity Name: CENTRAL FLORIDA FREEZER, INC.
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit

CENTRAL FLORIDA FREEZER, INC. is structured as a Domestic Profit Corporation, which, in Florida signifies a Profit Corporation (also known as a C-Corporation). This business structure is recognized as a separate legal entity from its owners. This offers shareholders the benefit of limited liability protection, safeguarding their personal assets from the corporation's debts and obligations, and facilitates raising capital through the issuance of stock. In Florida, Domestic Profit Corporations are governed by Title XXXVI, Chapter 607, Florida Statutes – Florida Business Corporation Act.

Status: Active

The business entity is active. This status indicates that the business is currently operating and compliant with state regulations, suggesting a lower risk profile for lenders and potentially better creditworthiness.

Date Filed: 16 Nov 2006 (18 years ago)
Last Event: REINSTATEMENT
Event Date Filed: 12 Dec 2023 (a year ago)
Document Number: P06000144354
FEI/EIN Number 205910522

Federal Employer Identification (FEI) Number assigned by the IRS.

Address: 1801 BRADFORD AVENUE, OFFICE, LEESBURG, FL, 34748
Mail Address: 1801 BRADFORD AVENUE, OFFICE, LEESBURG, FL, 34748, US
ZIP code: 34748
County: Lake
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Key Officers & Management

Name Role Address
PODOLSKY MINDY President 3000A AVE K, BROOKLYN, NY, 11210
PODOLSKY HOWARD Vice President 3000A AVE K, BROOKLYN, NY, 11210
PODOLSKY HOWARD Secretary 3000A AVE K, BROOKLYN, NY, 11210
PODOLSKY HOWARD Treasurer 3000A AVE K, BROOKLYN, NY, 11210
Stein Eric PEsq. Agent 1820 NE 163 Street, North Miami Beach, FL, 33162

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED 2023-12-12 1820 NE 163 Street, Suite 100, North Miami Beach, FL 33162 -
REGISTERED AGENT NAME CHANGED 2023-12-12 Stein, Eric P, Esq. -
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2023-12-12 1801 BRADFORD AVENUE, OFFICE, LEESBURG, FL 34748 -
REINSTATEMENT 2023-12-12 - -
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2023-09-22 - -
AMENDMENT 2020-12-18 - -
AMENDMENT 2013-08-14 - -
REINSTATEMENT 2013-01-07 - -
ADMIN DISSOLUTION FOR ANNUAL REPORT 2012-09-28 - -
CANCEL ADM DISS/REV 2008-11-17 - -

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2024-04-01
REINSTATEMENT 2023-12-12
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-03-24
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-01-21
Amendment 2020-12-18
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-06-16
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-02-07
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-01-15
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-01-24
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-03-07

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
338932817 0420600 2013-03-05 1801 BRADFORD AVE., LEESBURG, FL, 34748
Inspection Type FollowUp
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2013-03-05
Emphasis L: FORKLIFT, L: HINOISE
Case Closed 2013-05-01

Related Activity

Type Inspection
Activity Nr 655598
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 5A0001
Issuance Date 2013-03-20
Abatement Due Date 2013-05-06
Current Penalty 2000.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2013-04-16
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential releases of anhydrous ammonia and/or fire hazards: (a) At the engine room and ammonia tanks storage, ammonia detectors were not installed in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices such as contained in the ASHRAE 15, Section 8.11.2.1, on or about March 5, 2013. The Central Florida Freezer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health or its equivalent standard, Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, which contained in OSHA inspection number 655598, citation 1, item 1 and was affirmed as a final order on December 26, 2012.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19100134 F
Issuance Date 2013-03-20
Abatement Due Date 2013-05-06
Current Penalty 200.0
Initial Penalty 200.0
Final Order 2013-04-16
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: a) At the facility, maintenance employees were allowed to use respirators when repairing small ammonia leaks without being fit tested, on or about March 5, 2013. The Central Florida Freezer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1910.134(f), which contained in OSHA inspection number 655598, citation 2, item 3 and was affirmed as a final order on December 26, 2012.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Repeat
Standard Cited 19100178 A06
Issuance Date 2013-03-20
Abatement Due Date 2013-05-06
Current Penalty 200.0
Initial Penalty 200.0
Final Order 2013-04-16
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place: (a) At the dock, Nissan LPG forklift, 5000 pounds capacity, had an illegible nameplate and warning signs, on or about March 5, 2013. The Central Florida Freezer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6), which contained in OSHA inspection number 655598, citation 2, item 7 and was affirmed as a final order on December 26, 2012.
336555982 0420600 2012-09-25 1801 BRADFORD AVE., LEESBURG, FL, 34748
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2012-10-24
Case Closed 2013-09-12

Related Activity

Type Complaint
Activity Nr 572990
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 5A0001
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 1020.0
Initial Penalty 1700.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to potential releases of anhydrous ammonia and/or fire hazards: (a) At the engine room and ammonia tanks storage, ammonia detectors were not installed in accordance with generally accepted good engineering practices such as contained in the ASHRAE 15, Section 8.11.2.1 states: "Each refrigerating machinery room shall contain a detector, located in an area where refrigerant from a leak will concentrate", on or about September 25, 2012.
Citation ID 01002A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100132 A
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 1020.0
Initial Penalty 1700.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: a) At the battery room, employees maintained the batteries for high lift trucks, the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective equipment such as but not limited to protective clothing and chemical gloves, when employees were exposed to battery acid, on or about October 3, 2012. (b) At the engine room and ammonia tanks storage, maintenance employees repaired ammonia leaks, the employer did not provide appropriate personal protective equipment as but not limited to protective clothing and chemical gloves, when employees were exposed to ammonia, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 01002B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100132 D01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) At the battery room, employees maintained the batteries in the high lift trucks and the employer did not assess the job task to provide appropriate personal protective equipment such as but not limited to protective clothing and chemical gloves, when employees were exposed to battery acid, on or about October 3, 2012. (b) At the engine room and ammonia tanks storage, maintenance employees repaired ammonia leaks; the employer did not assess the job task to provide appropriate personal protective equipment as but not limited to protective clothing and chemical gloves, when employees were exposed to ammonia, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 01003A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 H01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 1020.0
Initial Penalty 1700.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned, disinfected, stored, inspected and repaired for employee's use: a) At the maintenance shop, maintenance employees had respirators ready to be used without been cleaned, disinfected and repaired. Maintenance employees while using them to repair small ammonia leaks, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 01003B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 H03 I B
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(i)(B): Respirators maintained for use in emergency situations were not inspected at least monthly and in accordance with manufacturer recommendations: (a) At the facility, a full-face respirator used in emergency was not inspected at least monthly, on or about September 25, 2012.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 K
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 1020.0
Initial Penalty 1700.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) At the facility, on October 3, 2012, maintenance employees did not receive training in respiratory protection in the following: 1. Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; 2. What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; 3. How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; 4. What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator; 5. How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators; and 6. The general requirements of the section 29 CFR 1910.134.
Citation ID 01005
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100151 C
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 1680.0
Initial Penalty 2800.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 10
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. a) At the battery room, the employer did not provide eye and body shower where employees did maintenance in batteries for the high lift trucks, on or about October 3, 2012. b) At the ammonia tanks storage and engine room, the employer did not provide eye and body shower where employees repaired small leaks of ammonia, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 01006
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 H01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 1020.0
Initial Penalty 1700.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. a) At the facility, on or about October 3, 2012, employees are exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to ammonia and employees had not been trained at least in the following: 1. Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released, etc.); 2. The physical, health, simple asphyxiation, combustible dust, and pyrophoric gas hazards, as well as hazards not otherwise classified, of the chemicals in the work area; 3. The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, including specific procedures the employer has implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, such as appropriate work practices, emergency procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used; and, 4. The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100095 D01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) At the engine room, maintenance employees were exposed to high level noise and the employer did not implemented a monitoring program, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 02002
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 E01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) At the facility, maintenance employees were provided with respirators without a medical evaluation, on or about October 3, 2012. Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Citation ID 02003
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 F
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(f): The employee was required to use a respirator without being fit tested with the same make, model, style and size of respirator that was to be used: a) At the facility, maintenance employees were allowed to use respirators when repairing small ammonia leaks without being fit tested, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 02004
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 H03 III
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 3
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(h)(3)(iii): Self-contained breathing apparatus were not inspected monthly, maintained in a fully charged state, recharged when the pressure falls to 90% and the employer did not determine that the regulator and warning devices function properly: (a) At the security guard shed, three Self-contained breathing apparatus were not inspected, on or October 3, 2012. (b) At the security guard shed, a Self-contained breathing apparatus used in the emergency respirator was empty, on or October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 02005
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100134 L01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(l)(1): Evaluations of the workplace were not conducted to ensure the written respiratory protection program was being effectively implemented: (a) At the facility, the employer established a respiratory protection program but it was not implemented, on or about September 25, 2012.
Citation ID 02006
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100147 C01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 20
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: (a) At the facility, maintenance employees repair ammonia refrigeration system such as but not limited to Vilter compressors, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 02007
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100178 A06
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2013-01-15
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place: (a) At the dock in the front of the freezer F, Nissan LPG forklift, 5000 pounds capacity, had an illegible nameplate and warning signs, on or About September 25, 2012.
Citation ID 02008
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100178 L04 III
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: a) At the facility, an employee was allowed to operate the forklift and his last powered industrial truck operator training was in January 29, 2004.
Citation ID 02009
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100178 L06
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2012-12-07
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): Certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation (a) At the facility, the employer trained the forklift operators but not written certification record of the training was maintained, on or about September 25, 2012.
Citation ID 02010
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100303 F01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.303(f)(1): Each disconnecting means required by Subpart S of Part 1910 for motors and appliances was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: (a) At the facility, D-freezer electric panel had unlabeled breakers, on or September 23, 2012.
Citation ID 02011
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 E01 I
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2012-12-21
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not comply a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. a) At the facility, list of the chemicals used by employees such as but not limited to ammonia, oxygen and acetylene, on or about October 3, 2012.
Citation ID 02012
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 G01
Issuance Date 2012-11-27
Abatement Due Date 2012-12-07
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2013-01-18
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: (a) At the facility, the employer did not have MSDS for the chemical such as but not limited to oxygen, acetylene and Engine Oil, Shell, 15W-40, on or about October 3, 2012.

Date of last update: 02 Apr 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State