|
346229214
|
0419730
|
2022-09-16
|
2911 39TH ST., ORLANDO, FL, 32806
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2022-09-16
|
| Emphasis |
N: COVID-19
|
| Case Closed |
2023-03-23
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1912925 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-03-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2023-04-20 |
| Current Penalty |
1506.75 |
| Initial Penalty |
2009.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-03-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a.) On or about 09/16/2022, the employer required employees to wear North half-face elastomeric respirators equipped with P-100 filters during range cleaning operations, and the employees had not been medically evaluated for respirator use. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet). |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100157 E02 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-03-16 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-03-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: a.) On or about 09/16/2022, portable fire extinguishers located throughout the facility were not visually inspected on a monthly basis. No abatement certification or documentation required for this item. |
|
|
|
343027173
|
0420600
|
2018-03-19
|
2911 39TH ST., ORLANDO, FL, 32806
|
|
| Inspection Type |
FollowUp
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2018-05-16
|
| Emphasis |
N: LEAD, L: LEAD
|
| Case Closed |
2018-07-18
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1159524 |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-06 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-06-18 |
| Current Penalty |
1109.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1109.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-07-16 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On the counter by the computer, 2.127 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about April 4, 2018. b) On the counter by the register, 1.6775 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about April 4, 2018. c) On the refrigerator handle, 1.3185 ug (micrograms) of lead was found, on or about April 4, 2018. Shooting Gallery Range, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1159524, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on May 2, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 2911 39th Street, Orlando, FL. |
|
|
|
341595247
|
0420600
|
2016-06-30
|
2911 39TH ST., ORLANDO, FL, 32806
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Health
|
| Close Conference |
2016-06-30
|
| Emphasis |
L: LEAD, N: LEAD
|
| Case Closed |
2018-07-18
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1105784 |
| Safety |
Yes |
| Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
1995.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
4988.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program or completed the elements that were required to be included. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 D01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability: a) During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator (N95 dust mask) and the employer did not select the appropriate respirator for the hazard. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
1995.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
4988.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a) In the lobby and range, an employee was exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 183 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, approximately 3.66 times the permissible exposure level of 50.0 ug/m3. Sampling was performed for 407 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 73 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about September 6, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level: a) In the lobby and range, the employer did not do an initial determination to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
1995.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
4988.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
8 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: a) On the squeegee handle in the gun range, 44.97um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. b) On the Exit door handle inside the gun range, 21.905 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. c) On the counter by the computer, 6.62 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. d) On the counter by the register, 5.505 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. e) On the Microwave numbers/handle, 4.5445 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. f) On the refrigerator handle, 2.7005 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. g) On the water dispenser lever, 2.2395 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. h) On the Exit door handle between the lobby and the gun range, 1.6365 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 II |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
1425.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
3563.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025: a) In the workplace, employees were not provided with training regarding the lead in their work area. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101025 M01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(i): The employer did not comply with all the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard for lead: a) In the workplace, employer did not have a Hazard Communication Program. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101030 C01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
1140.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2850.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: (a) At the workplace, there was not a written Exposure Control Plan where employees had occupational exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials. This violation was observed on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101030 F01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2016-11-30 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-12-14 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure: (a) At the workplace, the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series was not made available to employees who had occupational exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016. |
|
|
