| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-01-29
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-04-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-11 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On the 6/12 pitched roof, eye protection was not provided to an employee operating a pneumatic nail gun, exposing the employee to a struck by hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-11 |
| Current Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-21 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On the 6/12 pitched roof of a residential property, fall protection was not provided to an employee installing plywood sheeting, exposing the employee to a 20 foot 10 inch fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. b. In the roof truss system of a residential property, fall protection was not provided to an employee using a hammer to bend nails back, exposing the employee to a 8 foot 5 inch fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-11 |
| Current Penalty |
1700.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1700.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. Along the rear exterior wall, the 28 foot extension ladder used to access the 2nd story roof extended approximately 18 inches (1-1/2 rungs) past the landing surface, exposing an employee to a 21 foot 3 inch fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B08 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder: a. Along the rear exterior wall, the portable extension ladder used to access the 6/12 pitched roof was not secured from displacement, exposing an employee to a 21 foot 3 inch fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B05 I |
| Issuance Date |
2016-02-11 |
| Current Penalty |
1020.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1020.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-03-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder: a. At the jobsite, the base of the 14 foot extension ladder was at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately 2/3 thirds or .68% the working length of the ladder, exposing an employee to a 5 foot fall hazard, on or about 1/29/16. |
|
|
