| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County
2014CA000281 (BC)
|
Parties
| Name |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Tamiko Walker *C*
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CENTENNIAL BANK
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
FHA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
PROPERTY TRANSFER SERVICES, INC.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
MERS, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
NORA HINTON
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
FLORIDA OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CORELOGIC, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Zachary S. Foster
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
OLYMPUS INSURANCE COMPANY
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DEBI V. RUMPH
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
STONEGATE BANK
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
REGENT BANK
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DIANA ROWLAND
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DIANE BOYD LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
DAWN CALDER
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
VICTORIA RUIZ LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
WILLIAM WELLS LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
QUARLES & BRADY, LLP, SUZANNE M. MCLEAN, Travis R. Walker, Neil Dhawan, COLLEEN ELROD MILLER, Jason Phillips, JAMES E. ALBERTELLI, PATRICK ZALMAN, MATTHEW A. TORNINCASA, Gary R. Shendell, TRIPP SCOTT, P.A., Zachary S. Foster, WILLIAM P. CONVEY, MICHAEL LINTON
|
|
| Name |
WELTMAN, WEINBERG & REIS CO., LPA
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
U.S. BANK BANCORP
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
US BANK HOME MORTGAGE
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Barbara W. Bronis
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - St. Lucie
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2020-01-17
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-29
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Letter ~ REJECTION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-17
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Letter ~ REJECTION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-31
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ SC19-1120
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Prohibited from Pro Se Filing
|
| Description |
PROHIBITED from further pro se filings ~ ORDERED that the document filed by appellants on December 23, 2019 titled "Appellant's motion for recusal and disqualification, motion for relief and temporary restraining order, and or in the alternative motion to relinquish jurisdiction as to merits that are currently on appeal in the eleventh circuit court of appeals as to court order dated December 12, 2019" is treated as the response to this court's December 12, 2019 order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Having considered the response, this court concludes that sanctions are appropriate. See, e.g., Johnson v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., 136 So. 3d 507, 508 (Fla. 2014); Riethmiller v. Riethmiller,133 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 2013); May v. Barthet, 934 So. 2d 1184, 1186 (Fla. 2006). The Clerk of this Court is directed to no longer accept any paper filed by Robert Walker and Tamiko Walker unless the document has been reviewed and signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar who certifies that a good faith basis exists for each claim presented.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-23
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ FOR RECUSAL AND DISQUALIFICATION,MOTION FOR RELIEF AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER,AND OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION AS TO MERITS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON APPEAL IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AS TO COURT ORDER DATED DECEMBER 12, 2019
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tamiko Walker *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-23
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR RECUSAL AND DISQUALIFICATION,MOTION FOR RELIEF AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER,AND OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION AS TO MERITS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON APPEAL IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AS TO COURT ORDER DATED DECEMBER 12, 2019
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tamiko Walker *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-Stricken as Unauthorized ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the appellants’ July 17, 2017 motion for appellate attorney’s fees and costs is stricken as unauthorized.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-12
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-29
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Letter ~ REJECTION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellee, Property Transfer Services Inc.’s appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-16
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ PROPERTY TRANSFER SERVICES, INC.
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ *AMENDED* (U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee, Property Transfer Services, Inc.’s September 12, 2019 “motion for extension of time, or alternative, motion to adopt U.S. Bank and Centennial Bank's answers to Walker’s initial brief” is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Joinder in Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Joinder
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-16
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellee's Answer Brief ~ (CENTENNIAL BANK)
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ (AMENDED)
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellee, Centennial Bank’s appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-12
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-11
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ (CENTENNIAL BANK)
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-11
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ (CENTENNIAL BANK)
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-12
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-08-12
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that, having considered the notice of related cases filed by petitioners on July 8, 2019, case numbers 4D19-1226, 4D19-1349, and 4D19-2081 are consolidated for purposes of resolution by the same panel. Case number 4D19-2081 is dismissed as the petition states no basis for relief. Petitioners are cautioned that abusive filing may result in sanctions. See Johnson v. Bank of New York Mellon Tr. Co., 136 So. 3d 507 (Fla. 2014).GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-17
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees ~ *AND* COSTS
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-11
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Misc. Supreme Court Order ~ (SC19-1120) SC STAY IS LIFTED
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-10
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice of Discretionary Jurisdiction to Supreme Court ~ SECOND AMENDED
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte ~ This court determines that the appeal may proceed as to the May 8, 2019 “omnibus order denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate final judgments entered in favor of U.S. Bank, N.A., Centennial Bank, and Property Transfer Services, Inc.” pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(5) (permitting review of an order on an authorized and timely motion for relief from judgment). The appeal is dismissed as to the May 10, 2019 “order denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate omnibus order entered on May 8, 2019,” attached to the notice of appeal. Quarterman v. McNeil, 1 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (holding that an order on a motion for relief was not appealable where the motion was not directed towards a final judgment, decree, order or proceeding). As such, appellants’ arguments shall be limited to the May 8, 2019 order on appeal and arguments pertaining to orders not on appeal will not be considered. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(i); Jenne v. Maranto, 825 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (explaining that rule 9.130 does not authorize judges to enlarge its provisions to permit review of nonfinal orders not specified within its provisions). Further,ORDERED that appellants shall serve the initial brief and accompanying appendix, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(e), within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief and appendix are not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Additionally, a record shall not be transmitted to this court. Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(d).ORDERED that appellants’ June 3, 2019 time sensitive reply, motion for extension of time to file statement for basis of jurisdiction and initial brief, or in the alternative motion for judicial notice and motion to supplement the record is denied as moot. Further,ORDERED that appellants’ July 1, 2019 time sensitive motion for clarification or in the alternative renewed motion for judicial notice and motion for extension of time is denied as moot. Further,ORDERED that appellee’s July 2, 2019 joint motion for clarification is denied as moot. Further,Appellants are cautioned that abusive, repetitive, malicious, and/or frivolous filing may result in sanctions, such as a bar on pro se filing in this court. See Johnson v. Bank of New York Mellon Tr. Co., 136 So. 3d 507 (Fla. 2014).LEVINE, C.J., GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-09
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Order
|
| Description |
Misc. Supreme Court Order ~ SC19-1120 STAYED PENDING MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION IN 4D19-1349
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Expedite
|
| Description |
Motion To Expedite
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| Description |
Deny Expediting ~ ORDERED that appellants’ July 9, 2019 “expedited motion” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ NOTICE OF RELATED CASE AND OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDERWHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURES AND MOTION TO TRANSFER
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-03
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice of Discretionary Jurisdiction to Supreme Court
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice sent to the Supreme Court
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-02
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-02
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion For Clarification ~ (DENIED AS MOOT - SEE 07/10/19 ORDER)
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-07-01
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
| Description |
Motion For Clarification ~ *(DENIED AS MOOT - SEE 07/10/19 ORDER)* - APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION TO THE 4DCA HON. CORY J. CIKLIN ORDER DATED JUNE 25, 2019, ON RELATED CASE4D19-1226 AND CASE 4D19-1349 AND OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-06-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellee to File Response ~ ORDERED that appellee is directed to respond, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, to the appellants’ June 3, 2019 response.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-06-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-06-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
U.S. Bank, N.A.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-06-03
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ REJECTION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-06-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-06-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ *(DENIED AS MOOT - SEE 07/10/19 ORDER)* APPELLANT'S REPLY TO THE 4DCA HON. CORY J. CIKLIN ORDER DATED MAY 22, 2019, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATEMENT FOR BASIS OF JURDISDICTION AND INITIAL BRIEF FOR CASE 4D19-1349 AND OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE AND MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND MOTION TO SUPPLMENT THE RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-06-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-05-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this order appellants shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellants shall specifically address how the May 10, 2019 “order denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate omnibus order entered on May 8, 2019” is an appealable nonfinal order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(5). See Hollifield v. Renew & Co., Inc., 18 So. 3d 616, 617 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“Rule 1.540 authorizes a trial court to grant relief from a final judgment, decree, order, or proceeding-not from a non-final order such as that at issue here.”) (internal citations omitted). Appellants shall also show cause, if any there be, why this appeal should not be consolidated with appellants’ appeal pending in 4D19-1226; further, Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-05-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal ~ (CERTIFIED COPY FROM L.T.)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - St. Lucie
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-05-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee - pro se civil appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED, appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee.If appellant has already been found indigent for purposes of proceedings in the lower tribunal, in this case, appellant shall file a copy of that order in this court. If appellant does not have an order or a determination of indigent status and believes that he or she is insolvent, appellant shall complete the enclosed application and mail to the Clerk of the Circuit Court within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. A Notice of Compliance that you have applied for indigent status, must also be filed with this court. The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall forward the Clerk's Determination to this court within ten (10) days of receipt. Failure of appellant to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-05-14
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-05-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT WALKER *C*
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-05-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
