| Docket Date |
2022-02-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER (OR999) ~ As a matter of comity, this Court recognized the trial court’s order making the record below confidential. Currently, three matters filed in this Court file have been marked confidential: the Record on Appeal filed on July 28, 2017; the copy of the county court’s order filed on September 8, 2020; and the Motion to Seal filed September 8, 2020. The remaining docket entries are not marked confidential and are available to the public. This Court has never ordered that this entire file be deemed confidential. The Court, therefore, denies the Motion to have the entire file deemed confidential, without prejudice to pro se Appellant filing a motion identifying specific docket entries as containing confidential materials and providing legal authorities indicating why those materials must be deemed confidential under Florida law. LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-16
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO ENFORCE ORDERS SEALING COURT RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion Denied (OD999) ~ The Court denies pro se Appellant's February 8, 2022, Motionto Enforce Orders Sealing Court Record. This denial is without prejudice topro se Appellant filing a motion, in the proper court, pursuant to Rule 2.420of the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, tohave court records deemed confidential. Any such motion requesting partsof this Court's docket to be deemed confidential must identify, by name ofentry, docket date, and page number, the materials that pro se Appellantcontends should be treated as confidential. Further, pro se Appellant mustprovide a legal reason for treating such materials as confidential in light ofthe broad requirement concerning public records contained in Article I,section 24 of the Florida Constitution.LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO ENFORCE ORDERS SEALING COURT RECORD
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-09-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER (OR999) ~ Appellant’s pro se Motion to Seal Court File, filed on September 8, 2020, is hereby recognized by the Court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-09-08
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry ~ Order on unopposed motion to seal court record under Fla. R. J. Admin.2.420
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-09-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO SEAL RECORDS; THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER (OR999) ~ Upon consideration, Appellant’s pro se letter filed on December 9, 2019, is hereby stricken as unauthorized. LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-09
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Letter
|
| Description |
Letter
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-01-02
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ Petitioner's entreaty responding to opinion 12/18/18 has been treated as a motion for rehearing, and pursuant to this court's order dated Dec 18, 2018. said motion is hereby stricken as unauthorized.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-31
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ Petitioner's Discrepancy: Referenced SC18-1899; Correct SC 2018-812 Necessitates Correction has been treated as a motion for reinstatement, and pursuant to this court's order dated November 15, 2018, said motion is hereby stricken as unauthorized.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-12-18
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ It is ordered that the pet. for review is denied. No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-15
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Opinion
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ This case is hereby dismissed. This court lacks jurisdiction to review an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal that is issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to an authority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed or quashed by, this court. No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertained by the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry ~ Petition for reversal of mandate order-Filed in Florida Supreme Court
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-11-07
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL PETITION
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-06-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record (OD13) ~ Upon consideration, appellant’s May 25, 2018 motion to request the record from lower tribunals is hereby denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Withhold Issuance of Mandate denied (OD57B) ~ Upon consideration, appellant’s motion to stay mandate is hereby denied. SUAREZ, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-29
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Acknowledged Receipt from Supreme Court
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-25
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion to Supplement the Record
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-18
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
| Description |
Notice of Discretional Jurisdiction to Supreme Court
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-05
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-05-04
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-04-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Rehearing en Banc Denied (OD57F) ~ Upon consideration, petitioner’s petition pleading en banc review filed March 16, 2018 is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-03-16
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Victim's Right ArtlSec16
|
| Description |
Original Petition Filed ~ Petition for en banc review
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-03-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Treat EnBanc as Incl. Reh. & Deny(OD57H) ~ Upon consideration, petitioner’s motion for rehearing en banc is treated as having included a motion for rehearing. The motion for rehearing is denied. SUAREZ, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ., concur. The motion for rehearing en banc is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-02-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ to aa motion for rehearing en banc
|
| On Behalf Of |
Karen Capps
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-02-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-02-15
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing En Banc
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing EN BANC
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Rehearing denied (OD57) ~ Upon consideration, petitioner’s motion for rehearing is hereby denied. SUAREZ, LUCK an LINDSEY, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-31
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-29
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ to motion for rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Karen Capps
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-18
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-18
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2018-01-03
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Authored Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-28
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-09
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Karen Capps
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Clerk's notice granting eot (CLKEX) ~ AB (ANF Miami Gardens, LLC)-10 days to 10/18/17
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-03
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Karen Capps
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-09-13
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-08-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Extension Granted for Initial Brief (OGO3) ~ Appellant¿s motion for an extension of time to file the initial brief is granted to and including forty (40) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-08-10
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Letter
|
| Description |
Letter ~ Thank you to Judges
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-08-09
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-07-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-05-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
C1:Certificate of Indigency Filed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-05-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal Transmittal Form
|
| Description |
Notice of Transmittal--NOA
|
| On Behalf Of |
JUDY PERCIVAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-05-15
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case with attachments.
|
|
