|
342073871
|
0418800
|
2017-02-02
|
11477 SW 247 TERRACE, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33032
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-02-02
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-09-29
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1207382 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-19 |
| Current Penalty |
2988.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5976.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: On or about 2 February, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were working on the frame of a home under construction without the use of fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of up to approximately 18-20 feet. Southern Chills, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1107510, citation number 1 item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 1/22/2016 with respect to a workplace located at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33130. |
|
|
|
341591105
|
0418800
|
2016-06-29
|
17101 SW 96 STREET, MIAMI, FL, 33196
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Fat/Cat
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-06-30
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Accident |
| Activity Nr |
1107740 |
|
|
|
341592392
|
0418800
|
2016-06-29
|
17101 SW 96 ST., MIAMI, FL, 33196
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Fat/Cat
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-12-19
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-09-29
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Accident |
| Activity Nr |
1107740 |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1163578 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1161915 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1163575 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-19 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2016-12-23 |
| Current Penalty |
20577.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
27436.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-01-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Accident |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b) or as an alternative, covers. On or about 6/29/16, at 17101 SW 96 Street Miami, Florida 33196, employees who were on the second floor performing punch list duties, were not protected from falling approximately 10-feet through a floor opening, by a guardrail system, a personal fall arrest systems and/or covers. Southern Chills, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1107510, citation number 1, item number 3, issued on 1/6/2016, with respect to a workplace located at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, Miami, Florida 33130, which became a final order on 1/21/2016. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-12-19 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-01-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
19205.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-01-05 |
| Final Order |
2018-01-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about 6/29/2016, employees exposed to a fall hazard while working at elevated levels were not adequately trained to recognize fall hazards or procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. PLEASE NOTE: DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION. Southern Chills, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1107510, citation number 01, item number 003, issued on 1/6/2016, with respect to a workplace located at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, Miami, Florida 33130, which became a final order on 1/21/2016. |
|
|
|
341451268
|
0418800
|
2016-05-03
|
11863SW 233RD LANE, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33032
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2016-05-03
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2016-08-01
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1086839 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
|
|
341075851
|
0418800
|
2015-11-20
|
23265 SW 117TH COURT, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33032
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-11-20
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: CTARGET, N: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2016-01-06
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1107535 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1107626 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1107611 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1107620 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
|
|
341075109
|
0418800
|
2015-11-19
|
11160 SW 225TH TERRACE, MIAMI, FL, 33130
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2015-11-19
|
| Emphasis |
P: FALL, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-09-29
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-01-06 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-01-22 |
| Nr Instances |
4 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, an employee at the peak of the roof cutting plywood with a circular saw during sheathing was exposed to a struck-by hazard due to lack of eye protection. b) On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, an employee near the peak of the roof hammering nails into the plywood while sheathing was exposed to a struck-by hazard due to lack of eye protection. c) On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, an employee at the edge of the roof cutting lumber for the fascia with a circular saw was exposed to a struck-by hazard due to lack of eye protection. d) On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, an employee on a roof overhang hammering nails into the lumber was exposed to a struck-by hazard due to lack of eye protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-01-06 |
| Current Penalty |
5000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6300.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-01-22 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, employees installing sheathing on a residential roof were exposed to a 19.2 feet fall hazard due to lack of a fall protection system. b) On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, employees installing sheathing on a residential roof overhang were exposed to a 10.6 feet fall hazard due to lack of a fall protection system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-01-06 |
| Current Penalty |
3800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6300.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-01-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, the employer did not provide training to employees exposed to fall hazards while sheathing a residential roof and roof overhang. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D21 |
| Issuance Date |
2016-01-06 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2016-01-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: On or about 11/19/15, at 11160 SW 225th Terrace, in the city of Miami, the employer did not ensure personal fall arrest systems were inspected prior to each use, whereas one of the safety lines showed signs of wear and damage, but was not removed from service. |
|
|
