Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2018-02-13
|
Emphasis |
P: FALL, L: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2020-11-25
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1295415 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260020 B02 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
1386.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2772.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): a. At 1124 Sylvan Drive Sarasota Florida, at a three story residential home construction site, inspection of the job site to include a scaffolding system erected at the south side and southwest side of the building was not conducted, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
1386.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2772.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a. At the southwest side of the building, an employee was exposed to eye injuries, in that, a hand held angle grinder was used to grind the wall surface without using any type of eye protection, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 A06 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
1386.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2772.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: a. At the south side and south-west side of the building, a four frames high and two frames wide scaffold was bridged, using 2x10 planks, with a scaffold three frames high and three frames wide. The planking was bridged at 11 feet and was not placed in a manner that the overlap section was on a support. Note: Non-mandatory Appendix A to this subpart contains examples of criteria that will enable an employer to comply with paragraph (a) of 29 CFR 1926.451. |
|
Citation ID |
01004A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
2328.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3880.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a. At the west side of the building, employees were exposed to a 26 foot fall hazard during masonry work, in that, three plank platforms were used on the 4 frames high and two frames wide tubular welded frame scaffold, on or about 02/13/2018. b. At the south side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard during masonry work, in that, single plank platforms were used on the 3 frames high and 3 frames wide tubular welded frame scaffold equipped with a bracket scaffold platform, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01004B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 B02 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide: a. At the south side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard, in that, single plank platforms 10 inches wide were used on a three frames high and three frames wide tubular welded frame scaffold with a bracket scaffold platform attached at the top frame of the scaffold, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01005A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
1386.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2772.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph: a. South side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard, in that, a scaffold with a minimum base width of 3.6 feet and a height of 22 feet was not tied to the building as required to prevent it from tipping over, on or about 02/13/2018. b. At the west side of the building, employees were exposed to a 26 foot fall hazard, in that, a scaffold with a minimum base width of 3.6 feet and a height of 26 feet was not tied to the building as required to prevent it from tipping over, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01005B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 C02 II |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units: a. At the south side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard, in that, a tubular welded frame scaffold three frames high and three frames wide with two bracket scaffold platforms attached had the scaffold legs at the east side rested on stacked loose boards. The scaffold was built inside the newly constructed pool which had an uneven bottom, on or about 02/13/2018. b. At the west side of the building, employees were exposed to a 26 foot fall hazard, in that, a tubular welded frame scaffold four frames high and two frames wide had the outside scaffold leg at the south side rested on a loose board and a brick, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01006 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 C03 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
1386.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2772.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement: a. South side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard, in that, a tubular welded frame scaffold three frames high and three frames wide was missing the cross braces on the three middle frames at the wall side, on or about 02/13/2018. b. West side of the building, employees were exposed to a 26 foot fall hazard, in that, a tubular welded frame scaffold four frames high and two frames wide was missing the cross braces on four out of eight frames at the wall side, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01007 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
1386.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2772.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access: a. South side and west side of the building, two tubular welded frame scaffolds were not provided with means of access and employees were climbing the cross braces and the scaffold frames to gain access to the various work elevations, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01008 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
2328.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3880.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level: a. At the west side of the building, employees were exposed to a 26 foot fall hazard during masonry work, in that, guardrails were not installed on a tubular welded frame scaffold 4 frames high and two frames wide, on or about 02/13/2018. b. At the south side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard during masonry work, in that, guardrails were not installed on a tubular welded frame scaffold 3 frames high and 3 frames wide, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
Citation ID |
01009 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2018-03-09 |
Current Penalty |
2328.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3880.0 |
Final Order |
2018-03-28 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. At the south side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard during masonry work, in that, employees were using the balconies to gain access to and from the scaffold without using any type of fall protection, on or about 02/13/2018. b. At the south side of the building, employees were exposed to a 22 foot fall hazard during masonry work, in that, an employee was laying right at the edge of the balcony floor to gain access to the balcony wall below the flooring without using any type of fall protection, on or about 02/13/2018. |
|
|