| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-07-26
|
| Emphasis |
P: FALL, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2021-07-27
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-21 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-18 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2988.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. On or about July 26, 2017, an employee, not wearing a hard hat, was working on the ground below other employees who were working on the roof above, exposed to head injury from falling tools and or debris from the employees above. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-21 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5976.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer does not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from eye injuries while using pneumatic nail guns. The employer failed to assure effective protections against eye and face injuries as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 26, 2017, when two employees working on a residential roof at 12772 Bentwater Drive, Jacksonville, Florida, were not wearing any eye protection while using pneumatic nail guns, exposing themselves to eye injuries from flying debris or nails. SS Kelly Cooperation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.1926.102(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 902828, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on July 2, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 12168 Chippenham Court, Jacksonville, FL 32211. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-21 |
| Current Penalty |
10755.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
17926.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Imminent Danger |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. Employees performing roofing work are not protected from fall hazards by the use of a fall protection system. The employer failed to assure effective protection against falls, as required by the standard, as demonstrated on July 26, 2017, when three employees working on the north slope of the roof and two employees using a nail guns to install nails on a residential roof with a 6:12 pitch at 12772 Bentwater Drive, Jacksonville, Florida, were exposed to a 10 feet fall hazard to the ground. None of the five employees were attached to a personal fall protection system. SS Kelly Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1234113, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on July 25, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 10628 Quail Ridge Drive, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32004. SS Kelly Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 902828, citation number 1, item number 2, and was affirmed as a final order on July 15, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at 12168 Chippenham Court Jacksonville, FL 32211. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-05-24
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2018-09-12
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
1217528 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-18 |
| Current Penalty |
2281.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-26 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about May 22, 2017, on an 8:12 pitch roof, an employee was not protected from a 12-foot 3-inch fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternate fall protection, resulting in an employee falling from the roof and being hospitalized. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 K01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-18 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-11 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-26 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(1): A fall protection plan was not prepared by a qualified person and developed specifically for the site where the leading edge work was being performed: a. On or about March 22, 2017, at the jobsite, a site specific fall protection plan was not developed or implemented for employees working from elevations greater than 6-foot. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-04-29
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2014-01-08
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
815040 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-06-19 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-07-03 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about April 25, 2013, employees using pneumatic air nailers while installing shingles on the roof were not wearing safety glasses, exposing themselves to eye injuries. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-06-19 |
| Current Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-07-03 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about April 25, 2013, on the 8:12 pitch roof, employees performing roofing work were not protected from a 15 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system. |
|
|
