| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-02-14
|
| Emphasis |
P: FALL, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2014-12-04
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
791632 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-06-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-06-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-07-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. On or about February 14, 2013, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while pumping concrete on a mobile scaffold without using a means of fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2013-06-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-06-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-07-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: a. On or about January 17, 2013, at the above addressed job site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard while pumping concrete on a mobile scaffold without using a means of fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-06-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-06-19 |
| Current Penalty |
1700.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1700.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-07-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: a. On or about February 14, 2013, at the above addressed job site, employees had worked on a mobile scaffold that had not been inspected by a competent person. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 W02 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-06-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-06-19 |
| Current Penalty |
1700.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1700.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-07-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner: On or about February 14, 2013, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working on a mobile scaffold that had wheels that had not been locked. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260452 W06 II |
| Issuance Date |
2013-06-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-06-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-07-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(6)(ii): Employee(s) were allowed to ride on a scaffold that had a height that was more than two times the base width and had not been designed and constructed to meet or exceed nationally recognized stability test requirements: a. On or about February 14, 2013, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working on a mobile scaffold with a total height that exceeded the two to one height to base ratio. |
|
|
