| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-01-18
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2013-07-12
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-04-23 |
| Current Penalty |
1680.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-05-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a. On or about January 18th, 2013, at the above addressed job site, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working on a low sloped roof without fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-04-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-05-03 |
| Current Penalty |
1680.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-05-29 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about January 18, 2013, at the above job site, employees were not knowledgeable in recognizing fall hazards while working near the edge of a commercial roof. |
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-08-01
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: EISAX, P: FALL, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2013-02-06
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 C02 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Current Penalty |
960.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On the north exterior elevation of a building under construction located at 3055 Port Saint Lucie Boulevard in Port Saint Lucie, Florida: The frame legs of a fabricated frame scaffold erected on soil being used by employees performing masonry work upon approximately 11 ft. 6 inches above a lower level were not bearing on mud sills or another firm foundation, on or about August 1, 2012. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Current Penalty |
960.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: On the north exterior elevation of a building under construction located at 3055 Port Saint Lucie Boulevard in Port Saint Lucie, Florida: Employees performing masonry work upon the work level platform of a fabricated frame scaffold approximately 11 ft. 6 inches above a lower level did not have a ladder, ramp, walkway, or direct access from another scaffold, on or about August 1, 2012. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: On the north exterior elevation of a building under construction located at 3055 Port Saint Lucie Boulevard in Port Saint Lucie, Florida: A fabricated frame scaffold being used by employees performing masonry work was not inspected by a competent person prior to the work shift for visible defects including but not limited to baseplates not bearing on mudsills and a lack of fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Current Penalty |
960.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: On the north exterior elevation of a building under construction located at 3055 Port Saint Lucie Boulevard in Port Saint Lucie, Florida: Employees performing masonry work on the work level platform of a fabricated frame scaffold approximately 11 ft. 6 inches above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level, on or about August 1, 2012. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: On site of a building under construction located at 3055 port Saint Lucie Boulevard in Port Saint Lucie, Florida: The employer did not provide a training program for employees performing masonry work upon a fabricated frame scaffold, on or about August 1, 2012. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260020 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-09-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-09 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-10-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety program was not initiated and/or maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provision of the standard: On site of a building under construction located at 3055 Port Saint Lucie Boulevard in Port Saint Lucie, Florida: The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety and health program for employees performing work, on or about August 1, 2012. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION. |
|
|
