Search icon

AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.

Company Details

Entity Name: AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Domestic Profit
Status: Active
Date Filed: 18 Apr 2001 (24 years ago)
Document Number: P01000038951
FEI/EIN Number 651121748
Address: 8900 SW 104TH ST, MIAMI, FL, 33176, US
Mail Address: 8900 SW 104TH ST, MIAMI, FL, 33176, US
ZIP code: 33176
County: Miami-Dade
Place of Formation: FLORIDA

Agent

Name Role Address
GARCIA MARIA L Agent 8900 S.W 104TH. ST., MIAMI, FL, 33176

President

Name Role Address
GARCIA MARIA L President 8900 S.W 104TH. ST., MIAMI, FL, 33176
CASTILLO FREDDY A President 12424 S.W 126 AVE., MIAMI, FL, 33186

Vice President

Name Role Address
CASTILLO FREDDY A Vice President 12424 S.W 126 AVE., MIAMI, FL, 33186

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 2021-04-14 8900 SW 104TH ST, MIAMI, FL 33176 No data
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2021-04-14 8900 SW 104TH ST, MIAMI, FL 33176 No data
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS CHANGED 2005-04-19 8900 S.W 104TH. ST., MIAMI, FL 33176 No data

Debts

Document Number Status Case Number Name of Court Date of Entry Expiration Date Amount Due Plaintiff
J12000969165 TERMINATED 2011-4806 SP 05 MIAMI DADE COUNTY COURT 2012-11-15 2017-12-10 $5,137.12 TIMEPAYMENT CORP., 16 NEW ENGLAND EXECUTIVE PARK, SUITE 200, BURLINGTON, MA 01803

Court Cases

Title Case Number Docket Date Status
AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC., VS WILBUR RIVAS, etc., et al., 3D2020-1898 2020-12-21 Closed
Classification Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Prohibition
Court 3rd District Court of Appeal
Originating Court Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
18-29917

Parties

Name AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Role Appellant
Status Active
Representations Samuel E. Basch, Joseph J. Goldberg, RHIANNA L. BUSCH, Mark D. Tinker
Name WILBUR RIVAS
Role Appellee
Status Active
Representations Luis Menedez-Aponte, PHILLIP J. MITCHELL, JR., JUSTIN D. GROSZ, Elizabeth K. Russo, ELIZABETH JIMENEZ, Paulo R. Lima
Name FREDDY A. CASTILLO
Role Appellee
Status Active
Name Hon. David C. Miller
Role Judge/Judicial Officer
Status Active
Name Miami-Dade Clerk
Role Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date 2021-01-26
Type Mandate
Subtype Disp. w/o Mandate
Description Disp w/o mandate
Docket Date 2021-01-26
Type Misc. Events
Subtype West Publishing
Description West Publishing
Docket Date 2021-01-06
Type Disposition by Order
Subtype Denied
Description Prohibition Denied (Including Resp & Reply) (DA32) ~ Following review of the Petition for Writ of Prohibition, and the Response and Reply thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is hereby denied.
Docket Date 2021-01-06
Type Disposition by Opinion
Subtype Denied
Description Denied - Order by Judge
Docket Date 2020-12-31
Type Response
Subtype Reply
Description REPLY ~ REPLY TO THE RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
On Behalf Of AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Docket Date 2020-12-29
Type Response
Subtype Response
Description RESPONSE ~ RESPONDENT WILBUR RIVAS' RESPONSE TO PETITIONFOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
On Behalf Of WILBUR RIVAS
Docket Date 2020-12-23
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Appearance
Description Notice of Appearance
On Behalf Of WILBUR RIVAS
Docket Date 2020-12-23
Type Order
Subtype Order to Show Cause
Description Order to show cause-Proh(Rule Nisi)(OR12J) ~ The party, if any, opposing the relief requested in the Petition for Writ of Prohibition shall, and the respondent judge may, show cause as to why the relief requested should not be granted, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order. This Order stays further proceedings in the lower tribunal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(h). Further, a reply may be filed five (5) days thereafter. FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ., concur.
Docket Date 2020-12-21
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Fee Status
Description FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
Docket Date 2020-12-21
Type Record
Subtype Appendix
Description Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
On Behalf Of AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Docket Date 2020-12-21
Type Petition
Subtype Petition
Description Petition Filed ~ PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITIONRELATED CASE: 20-1466
On Behalf Of AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Docket Date 2020-12-21
Type Letter
Subtype Acknowledgment Letter
Description Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case letter with attachments.
AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC., VS WILBUR RIVAS, etc., 3D2020-1466 2020-10-12 Closed
Classification Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
Court 3rd District Court of Appeal
Originating Court Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
18-29917

Parties

Name AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Role Appellant
Status Active
Representations Samuel E. Basch, RHIANNA L. BUSCH, Mark D. Tinker, Joseph J. Goldberg
Name WILBUR RIVAS
Role Appellee
Status Active
Representations JUSTIN D. GROSZ, ELIZABETH JIMENEZ, Elizabeth K. Russo, Luis Menedez-Aponte, PHILLIP J. MITCHELL, JR.
Name Hon. David C. Miller
Role Judge/Judicial Officer
Status Active
Name Miami-Dade Clerk
Role Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date 2020-10-15
Type Order
Subtype Order to Respond to Petition
Description Order Resp. on all Petitions except Prohibi(OR12L) ~ Respondent is ordered to show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order as to why the relief sought in the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply within five (5) days thereafter.
Docket Date 2020-10-12
Type Letter
Subtype Acknowledgment Letter
Description Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case with attachments.
Docket Date 2020-10-12
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Fee Status
Description FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
Docket Date 2020-10-12
Type Record
Subtype Appendix
Description Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
On Behalf Of AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Docket Date 2020-10-12
Type Petition
Subtype Petition
Description Petition Filed ~ PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
On Behalf Of AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Docket Date 2020-11-03
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Response
Description Ext-granted to reply to response on pet. (OG01D) ~ Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Reply is granted. Petitioner shall file the reply to the Response to the Petition for Writ of Mandamus by November 4, 2020, as stated in the Motion.
Docket Date 2020-10-30
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Miscellaneous Docket Entry
Description Miscellaneous Docket Entry ~ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY
On Behalf Of AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.
Docket Date 2020-10-20
Type Record
Subtype Appendix
Description Appendix ~ APPENDIX TORESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
On Behalf Of WILBUR RIVAS
Docket Date 2020-10-20
Type Response
Subtype Response
Description RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
On Behalf Of WILBUR RIVAS
Docket Date 2020-10-15
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Appearance
Description Notice of Appearance
On Behalf Of WILBUR RIVAS
Docket Date 2020-11-30
Type Mandate
Subtype Disp. w/o Mandate
Description Disp w/o mandate
Docket Date 2020-11-30
Type Misc. Events
Subtype West Publishing
Description West Publishing
Docket Date 2020-11-10
Type Petition
Subtype Petition
Description Petition Granted (OG29) ~ Following review of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and the Response and Reply thereto, it is ordered that said Petition is granted. The order on summary judgment is vacated, and the matter is remanded to the trial court to conduct a hearing on the motion for summary judgment as contemplated in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c). See State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Lezcano, 22 So. 3d 632, 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“A trial court’s failure to conduct a hearing prior to ruling on the motion for summary judgment constitutes a denial of the due process guarantee of notice and an opportunity to be heard.”).
Docket Date 2020-11-10
Type Disposition by Opinion
Subtype Granted
Description Granted - Order by Judge
Docket Date 2020-11-04
Type Response
Subtype Reply
Description REPLY ~ REPLY TO THE RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
On Behalf Of AIRAM STONE DESIGNS, INC.

Documents

Name Date
ANNUAL REPORT 2024-04-03
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-03-01
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-04-09
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-04-14
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-01-15
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-04-30
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-04-09
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-02-10
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-03-09
ANNUAL REPORT 2015-04-01

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
341758332 0418800 2016-09-08 7323 NW 46 ST, MIAMI, FL, 33166
Inspection Type Referral
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2016-09-08
Emphasis N: SILICA
Case Closed 2018-10-01

Related Activity

Type Referral
Activity Nr 1133406
Health Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1175174
Safety Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100095 C01
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 1906.0
Initial Penalty 2716.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: (a) On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not establish an effective hearing conservation program for employees who operate sanding and polishing tools during stone countertop fabrication, exposed to continuous noise at 84.6% of the action level noise exposure or the equivalent sound level of approximately 88.7 decibels during 431 minute sampling period; exposure calculations include a zero (0) increment for the 49 minutes not sampled.
Citation ID 01002A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 C01
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 1141.0
Initial Penalty 1630.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not establish a written respiratory program with procedures for employees required to wear respirators when they grind, cut, sand, and assemble stone countertops.
Citation ID 01002B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 E01
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator, before the employees were fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed performing stone countertop fabrication while wearing tight fitting half mask respirators without a medical evaluation.
Citation ID 01002C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 F02
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not conduct fit testing for employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators, when performing stone countertop fabrication operations.
Citation ID 01002D
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 K01 VII
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of the general requirements of the standard: On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that employees who are required to wear a respirators during stone fabrication operations, were able to properly inspect respirators, check the seals of the respirator, know why proper fit is necessary, and how improper maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator.
Citation ID 01003A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 E01
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 1141.0
Initial Penalty 1630.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for employees who use hazardous chemicals such as, but no limited to, silica, a carcinogen, benzoyl peroxide, a sensitizer, and styrene, an irritant, while performing stone countertop fabrication tasks.
Citation ID 01003B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 F05 II
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure containers with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to alcohol and acetone, were identified with appropriate labeling.
Citation ID 01003C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 G08
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 3
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical: On or about September 8, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not collect and maintain copies of safety data sheets for employees who use hazardous chemicals such as, but no limited to, silica, a carcinogen, benzoyl peroxide, a sensitizer, and styrene, an irritant, while performing the stone countertop fabrication tasks.
Citation ID 01003D
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19101200 H01
Issuance Date 2017-02-27
Abatement Due Date 2017-05-23
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 4
Related Event Code (REC) Referral
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about September 8, 2016, the employer did not provide effective information on health hazards of silica dust, adhesives, and solvents to employees who use hazardous chemicals to perform stone countertop fabrication tasks.
341751741 0418800 2016-09-03 12424 S.W 126 AVE., MIAMI, FL, 33186
Inspection Type Fat/Cat
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2016-09-03
Emphasis L: FORKLIFT
Case Closed 2018-06-29

Related Activity

Type Accident
Activity Nr 1132915
Safety Yes
Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1175833
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100176 B
Issuance Date 2017-03-02
Abatement Due Date 2017-04-06
Current Penalty 8874.0
Initial Penalty 12675.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
Related Event Code (REC) Accident
Gravity 10
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse: On or about September 3, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not ensure that A- frame storage racks were capable of supporting the load of the granite and marble slabs that were stacked on them, thereby exposing employees to struck-by/crushed-by hazards, in the event of an unexpected collapse of the storage racks.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100178 L01 I
Issuance Date 2017-03-02
Abatement Due Date 2017-04-06
Current Penalty 2535.0
Initial Penalty 3622.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about September 3, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not ensure that all employees who operated a powered industrial truck were trained in the safe operation of the forklift.
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100303 B02
Issuance Date 2017-03-02
Abatement Due Date 2017-04-06
Current Penalty 2535.0
Initial Penalty 3622.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: On or about September 3, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not ensure that all 110 VAC receptacles in areas where wet cutting and polishing occurred, were approved for use in a wet/damp location.
Citation ID 02001
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100178 A04
Issuance Date 2017-03-02
Abatement Due Date 2017-04-06
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: On or about September 3, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not ensure that a forklift front-end attachment which was used on a forklift to move stone slab products was approved by the manufacturer or a qualified Registered Professional Engineer.
Citation ID 02002
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100178 A05
Issuance Date 2017-03-02
Abatement Due Date 2017-04-06
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: On or about September 3, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not ensure that a forklift front-end attachment which was used on a forklift to move stone slab products was marked with its load capacity as required by the Standard.
Citation ID 02003
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100305 G01 IV A
Issuance Date 2017-03-02
Abatement Due Date 2017-04-06
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2017-03-24
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 6
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: On or about September 3, 2016, at the above addressed job site, the employer did not ensure that flexible cords supplying 110-VAC to equipment were not used as a substitute for fixed wiring.

Date of last update: 01 Feb 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State