| Docket Date |
2017-03-17
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Publish Full
|
| Description |
PUBLISH FULL
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-03-16
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate Issued
|
| Description |
MANDATE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-02-23
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Quashed & Remanded
|
| Description |
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED ~ FSC-OPINION: Accordingly, we quash in part the Fifth District's decision below that affirmed the trial court's order temporarily enjoining Planned Parenthood from performing abortions at the Kissimmee Health Center and its conclusion that Planned Parenthood "needed to establish changed circumstances" in its motion to modify or dissolve the temporary injunction. Planned Parenthood, 171 So. 3d at 128. Because the stay of the temporary injunction has been in effect since the Fifth District issued the stay at the outset of the litigation, the parties will have substantial additional evidence regarding Planned Parenthood's activities and whether they, in fact, violate the Declaration. We remand this case to the Fifth District with instructions that it be further remanded to the trial court to conduct permanent injunction proceedings. It is so ordered.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Counsel Substitution
|
| Description |
NOTICE-COUNS SUBSTITUTION ~ Joint Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
MMB PROPERTIES
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-08-31
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Oral Argument Held
|
| Description |
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
OA Schedule (Prev Accepted)
|
| Description |
ORDER-OA SCHED (PREV ACCEPTED) ~ The Court previously accepted jurisdiction. The Court will hear oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, August 31, 2016.A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-14
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Request-Oral Argument
|
| Description |
REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT ~ PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-04-14
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply-Merit
|
| Description |
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-02-16
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Ext of Time (Reply Brief-Merit)
|
| Description |
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) ~ PETITIONER PLANNED PARENTHOOD'S UNOPPOSEDMOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-02-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Extension of Time (Merits Brief)
|
| Description |
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) ~ Petitioner Planned Parenthood's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including April 14, 2016, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-02-15
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer-Merit
|
| Description |
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS ~ RESPONDENT MMB PROPERTIES' ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS
|
| On Behalf Of |
MMB PROPERTIES
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-01-19
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Ext of Time (Answer Brief-Merit)
|
| Description |
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) ~ Respondent MMB Properties's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
MMB PROPERTIES
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-01-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Extension of Time (Merits Brief)
|
| Description |
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) ~ Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer Brief is granted, and respondent is allowed to and including February 15, 2016, in which to serve the answer brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR THE FILING OF THE ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-12-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record/Transcript
|
| Description |
RECORD ~ Record on Appeal (Filed electronically)
|
| On Behalf Of |
Joanne P. Simmons
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-12-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Couns Pro Hac Vice (Foreign Counsel)
|
| Description |
ORDER-COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE GR (FOREIGN COUNSEL) ~ The Motion for Admission to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed in the above cause by Maithreyi Ratakonda, on behalf of petitioner, is hereby granted and counsel's payment of the $100.00 fee required by section 25.241(3), Florida Statutes (2004), was received by this Court on December 14, 2015.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-12-14
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Couns Pro Hac Vice (Foreign Counsel)
|
| Description |
MOTION-COUNS PRO HAC VICE (FOREIGN COUNSEL)
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-12-14
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial-Merit
|
| Description |
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS ~ PETITIONER/DEFENDANT PLANNED PARENTHOOD'SBRIEF ON THE MERITS
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-12-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Appearance
|
| Description |
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
| On Behalf Of |
MMB PROPERTIES
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-11-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Extension of Time (Merits Brief)
|
| Description |
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) ~ Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted, and petitioner is allowed to and including December 14, 2015, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits; respondent's answer brief on the merits shall be served forty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served forty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-11-10
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Ext of Time (Initial Brief-Merit)
|
| Description |
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) ~ PETITIONER/DEFENDANT PLANNED PARENTHOOD'SUNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FORTHE PARTIES TO FILE THEIR BRIEFS ON THE MERITS
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-11-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Juris Accept/Brief Sched (OA Later Date)
|
| Description |
ORDER-JURIS ACCEPT/BRIEF SCHED (OA LATER DATE) ~ The Court accepts jurisdiction of this case. Petitioner's initial brief on the merits shall be served on or before November 23, 2015; respondent's answer brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits.The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal shall file the record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before January 4, 2016. The Clerk may provide the record in the format as currently maintained at the district court, either paper or electronic.Oral argument will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately sixty days prior to oral argument.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-11-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Stay Proceedings Below
|
| Description |
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS BELOW GR ~ Petitioner's Motion to Review Order Denying Motion to Stay filed in the above cause is granted and proceedings in the Fifth District Court of Appeal and in the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit in and for Osceola County, Florida, are hereby stayed pending disposition of the petition for review filed herein.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-10-05
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Juris Answer
|
| Description |
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
MMB PROPERTIES
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-10-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONDENT MMB PROPERTIES'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY ISSUANCE OF MANDATE
|
| On Behalf Of |
MMB PROPERTIES
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Extension of Time (Response/Reply)
|
| Description |
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE) ~ Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petitioner's Motion to Review Order Denying Motion to Stay Issuance of Mandate is granted and respondent is allowed to and including October 5, 2015, in which to file its response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR FILING THE RESPONSE.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-24
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Ext of Time (Response/Reply)
|
| Description |
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE)
|
| On Behalf Of |
MMB PROPERTIES
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-15
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Juris Initial
|
| Description |
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF ~ W/APPENDIX
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-15
|
| Type |
Motion
|
| Subtype |
Stay (Proceedings Below)
|
| Description |
MOTION-STAY (PROCEEDINGS BELOW) ~ FILED AS "PETITIONER/DEFENDANT PLANNED PARENTHOODOF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC.'S MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY"
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-09
|
| Type |
Letter-Case
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter-New Case
|
| Description |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-04
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2015-09-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
| On Behalf Of |
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER ORLANDO, INC.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
