| Docket Date |
2020-02-27
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Closed
|
| Description |
Case Closed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-28
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge ~ Lucas, Rothstein-Youakim, and Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-28
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
deny mandamus as moot ~ This petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ CITY OF SARASOTA'S, ON BEHALF OF SARASOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT, RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
SARASOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-20
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
SARASOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
| Description |
ORD-DISCHARGING SHOW CAUSE ~ This court's October 24, 2019, order to show cause is discharged.This case is converted to a petition for writ of mandamus.The petition for writ of mandamus is denied with respect to issues associated with service of the petitioner's complaint(s).Within 30 days of the date of this order, the respondents shall respond to the petition for writ of mandamus filed on September 4, 2019, with respect to the several motions mentioned in the petition. The petitioner may reply within 30 days of service of the respective responses.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-21
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
| Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ The petition to invoke all writs jurisdiction is dismissed for lack ofjurisdiction because the petitioner has failed to cite an independent basis thatwould allow the Court to exercise its all writs authority and no such basis isapparent on the face of the petition. See Williams v. State, 913 So. 2d 541, 543-44(Fla. 2005); St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So. 2d 1304, 1305 (Fla. 1980).Petitioner’s motion to stay is hereby denied. No motion for rehearing will beentertained by this Court.CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LAWSON, LAGOA, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Supreme Court
|
| Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
| Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL PETITION ~ PETITION ALL WRITS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-12
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ to show cause order
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT L. DAVIS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The appellant's motion for injunction relief is denied.Within 15 days of the date of this order the appellant shall show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as moot. The appellant asserts in paragraph 2 of his motion that he has served all defendants with his civil complaint.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-15
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ FOR INJUNCTION RELIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT L. DAVIS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The appellant's "motion to have filed writ of mandamus reviewed as a writ of mandamus" is denied. This case shall proceed as a direct appeal.The appellant's "notice and certification that defendants . . . have been served . . ." is noted. However, the appellant is cautioned that this court takes no action relative to the civil procedure between the parties in the trial court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-10
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ MCHUGH - 214 PAGES
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-08
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Lower Tribunal Insolvency
|
| Description |
LOWER TRIBUNAL INSOLVENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
SARASOTA CLERK
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-25
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ /CERTIFICATION CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED IN LT W/ATTACHED
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT L. DAVIS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-25
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing on an Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT L. DAVIS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ CERTIFIED FIRST PAGE OF MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT L. DAVIS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ The petition for writ of mandamus concerning circuit court case number 2019-CA-708 NC is treated as a notice of appeal of the order denying petition for writ of mandamus entered on August 12, 2019. The appeal will proceed under the present case number. Within 15 days of this order, the clerk of the circuit court shall certify the enclosed copy of the first page of the petition as a notice of appeal and transmit it to this court. The deadlines for record preparation and transmission and service of the initial brief shall be counted from the date of this order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(e), (f).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-04
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT L. DAVIS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-04
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ TO BE DECLARED INDIGENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
ROBERT L. DAVIS
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-04
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-09-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
fee waiver approved - writ
|
|
