Docket Date |
2018-01-17
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Order-Original Proceeding Dismissed ~ ORDERED that this case is dismissed for failure to file a petition and appendix as required by this Court's August 9, 2017 order.WARNER, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-17
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-10-26
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that petitioner's October 19, 2017 motion for extension of time is granted and the time to file a petition for writ of prohibition is extended sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-10-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE WRIT OF PROHIBITION
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-09-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that petitioner's August 28, 2017 motion for extension of time is granted in part. The time for petitioner to file a petition and appendix is extended thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-08-28
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE WRIT OF PROHIBITION
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-08-09
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Reclassifying Case
|
Description |
ORD-NOA Treated as Writ ~ Upon consideration of appellant's July 17, 2017 jurisdictional statement, it is ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed as to the order denying the motion for default. See Roche v. Commercial Tech. Consultants Co., 534 So. 2d 1243, 1244 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) ("an order denying a motion for default is neither a final order nor an appealable non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)"). The appeal is converted into a petition for a writ of prohibition as to the order denying the motion for disqualification. See Gibellina v. Iwanowski, 103 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Petitioner shall file a petition and appendix in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100 within twenty (20) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-08-09
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-17
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that within ten (10) days from the date of this order appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address why the appeal should not be dismissed as to the order denying the motion for default, See Roche v. Commercial Tech. Consultants Co., 534 So. 2d 1243, 1244 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (“an order denying a motion for default is neither a final order nor an appealable non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)”), and why the appeal from the order denying the motion for disqualification should not be converted to a petition for writ of prohibition. See Gibellina v. Iwanoski, 103 So. 3d 1049 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). FurtherAppellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-12
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-11
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-07-11
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
JAMES LEON MACKEY Jr.
|
|