| Docket Date |
2017-02-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Determine Confidentiality
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant Confidentiality ~ ORDERED that the December 21, 2016 Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records is granted. The information required by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(3) follows: (A)This is a probate case; (B) The particular grounds under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(c) for confidentiality are that under section 63.162, Florida Statutes, hearings and records in adoption proceedings are considered confidential; (C) The parties’ names are not confidential; (D) The progress docket is not confidential; (E) The particular information that is determined to be confidential is as follows: the initial brief, pages 7-12, the appendix to the initial brief, Exhibits 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, and 14; (F) The persons who are permitted to view are all persons listed in the certificate of service: Michele K. Feinzig, Esq. Patricia R. Voss, Esq.; Raymond Paparella, Esq.; Scott W. Leeds, Esq.; Edward B. Cohen, Esq.; Lawrence W. Livoti, Esq.; Rosa Marie Sodaro Evans; Michael Thomas Sodaro; Roseann Sodaro French; Joyce Margaret Sodaro Gonzalez; Paul Jennings Sodaro, Jr.; Denise Lynn Sodaro Petry; Sonya Renee Sodaro; Danette Lynn Chaffin; Sara K. Pantazes; Kimberley Lynn Sodaro; Catherine G. Allum; William V. Gegumis; Susan M. Recker; Carole J. Sloan; Annette M. Insco; Deaton Payne Ellis, Jr.; Linda Susan Monday; John Van Gegumis; Bert A. Rhodes; Andrea E. Leonard; Michael Anthony Rhodes; George Franklin Sodaro, and Sharon Lynn Sodaro Lunsford; (G) This Court finds that (i) the degree, duration, and manner of confidentiality ordered by the court are no broader than necessary to protect the interests set forth in subdivision (c); and (ii) no less restrictive measures are available to protect the interests set forth in subdivision (c); and (H) The Clerk of the Court is directed to publish the order in accordance with subdivision (e)(4) by posting a copy of this order, within ten (10) days following its entry, on the Clerk's website and in a prominent public location in the courthouse, to remain posted in both locations for no less than thirty (30) days.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-02-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ PROPOSED AMENDED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-02-02
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Entry/Document ~ PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS PURSUANT TO 1/24/17 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Granting Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ Upon consideration of appellants’ January 11, 2017 response, it is ORDERED that appellees’ January 3, 2017 motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and the above-styled appeal is dismissed without prejudice for appellants to appeal from an order which finally determines a right or obligation of an interested person pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.170; further, ORDERED that appellees' January 18, 2017 unopposed motion for leave to file reply to appellants' opposition to motion to dismiss appeal is denied as moot, and the proposed reply is stricken from the docket; further, ORDERED that appellants shall file, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, a proposed order granting the motion to determine confidentiality of court records. A form order is attached for reference. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in denial of the motion to determine confidentiality and the striking of any documents that were submitted for filing under seal. CIKLIN, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DETERMINE CONFIDENTIALITY OF COURT RECORDS [Rule 2.420(g)] ORDERED that the [Date] Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records is granted. The information required by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(e)(3) follows: (A) [Type of case]; (B) [Particular grounds under subdivision (c) for confidentiality]; (C) [Whether party name is confidential; if so, pseudonym]; (D) [Whether progress docket is confidential]; (E) [Particular information that is determined to be confidential]; (F) [Identification of persons who are permitted to view]; (G) This Court finds that (i) the degree, duration, and manner of confidentiality ordered by the court are no broader than necessary to protect the interests set forth in subdivision (c); and (ii) no less restrictive measures are available to protect the interests set forth in subdivision (c); and (H) The Clerk of the Court is directed to publish the order in accordance with subdivision (e)(4) by posting a copy of this order, within ten (10) days following its entry, on the Clerk's website and in a prominent public location in the courthouse, to remain posted in both locations for no less than thirty (30) days.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-24
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Reply to Response ~ (REPLY TO APPELLANTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL) **STRICKEN FROM THE DOCKET - SEE 1/24/17 ORDER**
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-18
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Leave to File Reply
|
| Description |
Motion for leave to file reply ~ TO APPELLANTS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-11
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ (OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL)
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-03
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ AMENDED NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FOR APPENDIX
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-21
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Determine Confidentiality
|
| Description |
Motion To Determine Confidentiality of Court Records ~ **AMENDED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-21
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-21
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ **REDACTED**
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-16
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ **CORRECTED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED 12/21/16******CONFIDENTIAL****
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Confidential Information Within Court Filing ~ (PAGES 7 THROUGH 12 OF APPELLANTS' INITIAL BRIEF)
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **CORRECTED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED 12/21/16** ****CONFIDENTIAL****
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant Substitution of Counsel ~ ORDERED that pursuant to the stipulation for substitution of counsel filed November 28, 2016, Michele K. Feinzig and the Law Offices of Robin Bresky are substituted for Michele M. Thomas and Adrian Philip Thomas, P.A. as counsel for appellees, George W. French and Roseann Sodaro French as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Joseph Nicholas Sodaro, in the above-styled cause.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES.
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-28
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| Description |
Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellants' November 9, 2016 motion for extension of time to file appellants' initial brief is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-09
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESS
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-10-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellant's October 4, 2016 second request for extension is treated as a motion for extension of time and is granted. Appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellant is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-10-04
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-09-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ ORDERED that appellees' August 3, 2016 motion to dismiss is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-08-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 14, 2016 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within ninety (90) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-08-03
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-07-14
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-07-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Withdraw as Counsel ~ The July 8, 2016 motion of Thomas W. White Esq., counsel for appellants, to withdraw as counsel is granted. Accordingly, it isORDERED that (1) this appeal is stayed for twenty (20) days from the date of this order so that new counsel, if desired, may be obtained;(2) this stay will be automatically lifted if substitute counsel files a notice of appearance prior to the end of the 20 day abatement period;(3) if no counsel has filed a notice of appearance within twenty (20) days, all pleadings shall be sent to appellants at the address appearing below; (4) if substitute counsel does not appear within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, appellants are advised that the case will move forward after the abatement period and compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and the rules of this court is required. Failure to comply with the rules may result in dismissal or other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-07-08
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-07-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants in the above-styled case are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before July 18, 2016, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the appellants' initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance ~ & DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESS
|
| On Behalf Of |
THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH NICHOLAS SODARO
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-10
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-10
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-05-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
PRISCILLA SODARO UBL
|
|
