| Docket Date |
2022-07-12
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael A. Wolff
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-23
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ Amended
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-23
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Amended Appellant's Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Grant Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that appellee’s May 25, 2022 motion to strike is granted, and appellant’s initial brief and amended appendix to the initial brief are stricken from the docket. See Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Further, ORDERED that appellant’s June 9, 2022 motion to supplement the record is granted in part, and the record is supplemented to include the transcript from the January 24, 2022 hearing before Judge Hafele. All other relief requested in the motion is denied. Further, ORDERED that appellant shall file, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, an amended initial brief and amended appendix that do not reference the “master service agreement” contained in the April 14, 2022 amended appendix. Appellee shall serve the answer brief within twenty (20) days from the date of service of the amended initial brief.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-31
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellant's March 2, 2023 motion for rehearing and clarification is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-14
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-09
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael A. Wolff
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-15
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Moot ~ ORDERED that appellant’s August 25, 2022 “motion to utilize exhibits for oral arguments” is denied as moot. Further, ORDERED that appellant’s August 25, 2022 “motion to utilize court reporter for oral arguments” is denied as moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-10-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
| Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-25
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO UTILIZE EXHIBITS FOR ORAL ARGUMENTS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-25
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-24
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-25
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ 1045 LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael A. Wolff
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee’s July 12, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before July 27, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-09
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-09
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-25
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael A. Wolff
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael A. Wolff
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 06/13/2022
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Withdraw Filing
|
| Description |
ORD-To Withdraw Pleadings ~ ORDERED that appellant’s May 3, 2022 notice of withdrawal is treated as a motion to withdraw the motion to stay and is granted. Appellant’s April 18, 2022 motion to stay is considered withdrawn.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-03
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Withdraw Filing
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw Pleadings
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-18
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ **Withdrawn**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ AMENDED **Stricken**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that appellant’s appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains no bookmarks as required by Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-12
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **Stricken**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-12
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ **Stricken**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ EXTENDED TO 04/12/2022
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s December 3, 2021 jurisdictional brief, this appeal shall proceed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ EXTENDED TO 02/23/2022
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 161 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLANT'S STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael A. Wolff
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s November 17, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the statement on jurisdiction on or before December 3, 2021.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-17
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ TO FILE STATEMENT ON JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Michael A. Wolff
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the October 27, 2021 order is an appealable final or nonfinal order, as it appears the order dismisses a crossclaim. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass’n, 303 So. 2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1974) (“We adhere to the rule that piecemeal appeals should not be permitted where claims are legally interrelated and in substance involve the same transaction.”); C.P. Ward v. Enter. Bldg. Corp., 497 So. 2d 700, 700 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (“Since the substance of the cross-claim arises out of the same circumstances underlying the plaintiff’s action which is still pending, the appeal from the dismissal of the cross-claim is premature.”). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-04
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-04
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-03
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Topvalco Inc.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-03
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
