Search icon

RADWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

Company Details

Entity Name: RADWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Jurisdiction: FLORIDA
Filing Type: Foreign Limited Liability Company
Status: Inactive
Date Filed: 05 Jun 2015 (10 years ago)
Date of dissolution: 28 Feb 2023 (2 years ago)
Last Event: WITHDRAWAL
Event Date Filed: 28 Feb 2023 (2 years ago)
Document Number: M15000004436
FEI/EIN Number 26-4390291
Address: 3560 Tyree Springs Rd, Hendersonville, TN 37075
Mail Address: 3560 Tyree Springs Rd, Hendersonville, TN 37075
Place of Formation: DELAWARE

Agent

Name Role
CORPORATION COMPANY OF MIAMI Agent

Chief Executive Officer

Name Role Address
REPETTI, STEVE Chief Executive Officer 3560 Tyree Springs Rd, Hendersonville, TN 37075

Events

Event Type Filed Date Value Description
WITHDRAWAL 2023-02-28 No data No data
CHANGE OF PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 2019-01-26 3560 Tyree Springs Rd, Hendersonville, TN 37075 No data
CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS 2019-01-26 3560 Tyree Springs Rd, Hendersonville, TN 37075 No data

Court Cases

Title Case Number Docket Date Status
RADWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and RADWEB TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS I, LLC VS FRANC NEMANIC 4D2021-2232 2021-07-28 Closed
Classification NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
Court 4th District Court of Appeal
Originating Court Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE17-011472

Parties

Name RADWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Role Appellant
Status Active
Representations Daniel A. Bushell
Name RadWeb Technology Partners I, LLC
Role Appellant
Status Active
Name Franc Nemanic
Role Appellee
Status Active
Representations Ronald Peter Ponzoli, Richard A. Jarolem
Name Hon. Nicholas Lopane
Role Judge/Judicial Officer
Status Active
Name Clerk - Broward
Role Lower Tribunal Clerk
Status Active

Docket Entries

Docket Date 2021-07-28
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Appeal
Description Notice of Appeal Filed
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2021-07-28
Type Letter
Subtype Acknowledgment Letter
Description Acknowledgment Letter
Docket Date 2022-07-01
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Reply Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Reply Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2022-12-06
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Oral Argument Date Set
Description Oral Argument Date Set ~ 4DCA
Docket Date 2022-10-18
Type Disposition by Order
Subtype Dismissed
Description Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the October 6, 2022 stipulation for dismissal, this case is dismissed.
Docket Date 2022-10-18
Type Disposition
Subtype Dismissed
Description Dismissed - Order by Clerk
Docket Date 2022-10-06
Type Motions Other
Subtype Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
Description Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ STIPULATION
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2022-09-23
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description ORD-Setting Oral Argument ~ This case is set for Oral Argument on December 6, 2022, at 10:00 A.M. for 15 minutes per side, in person at the Fourth District Court of Appeal Courthouse.  If a side anticipates more than two attorneys sitting at counsel table during oral argument, it shall contact the Marshal’s Office by phone at least two business days before the oral argument session. The court calendars can be viewed on this court's website at www.4dca.org.  In criminal cases where a victim, as defined in Article I, Section 16(e) of the Florida Constitution, has invoked their right to notice under Article I, Section 16(b)(6) of the Florida Constitution, the State shall provide the victim with notice of this oral argument and of any changes to the scheduled date or time.Within seven (7) days from the date of this order, either side may file a motion for remote oral argument, which, if granted, would take place on the same week as the currently scheduled in-person oral argument, with the date and time to be set by further order of this court.  Before filing the motion, the moving party shall confer with the opposing side to ascertain whether the opposing side agrees to a remote oral argument.  The motion shall state: (1) the reasons why remote oral argument is requested; and (2) whether the opposing side consents to a remote oral argument.  If the motion is opposed, then the opposing side shall file a response to the motion within three (3) days after the filing of the motion.  No extensions of time to file the motion or response will be permitted, absent extraordinary circumstances.  If the court grants the motion for remote oral argument, the argument will take place via Zoom video conference and all judges and attorneys will appear remotely.
Docket Date 2022-08-15
Type Motions Relating to Oral Argument
Subtype Motion/Request for Oral Argument
Description Request for Oral Argument
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2022-08-02
Type Brief
Subtype Reply Brief
Description Appellant's Reply Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2022-07-20
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellants’ July 19, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the reply brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
Docket Date 2022-07-19
Type Motions Extensions
Subtype Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
Description Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2022-07-01
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 15 DAYS TO 07/19/2022
Docket Date 2022-06-02
Type Brief
Subtype Answer Brief
Description Appellee's Answer Brief
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2022-06-01
Type Order
Subtype Order Striking Filing
Description Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellee’s May 31, 2022 answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
Docket Date 2022-05-31
Type Brief
Subtype Answer Brief
Description Appellee's Answer Brief ~ **Stricken**
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2022-05-24
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee’s May 23, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before May 31, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
Docket Date 2022-05-23
Type Motions Extensions
Subtype Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2022-05-10
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee’s May 9, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before May 27, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
Docket Date 2022-05-09
Type Motions Extensions
Subtype Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
Description Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2022-04-08
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 05/23/2022
Docket Date 2022-04-08
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2022-03-10
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 04/22/2022
Docket Date 2022-03-10
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2022-02-03
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 03/23/2022
Docket Date 2022-02-03
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2022-01-21
Type Brief
Subtype Initial Brief
Description Initial Brief on Merits
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2022-01-10
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellants’ December 28, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
Docket Date 2021-12-30
Type Response
Subtype Response
Description Response ~ AND OBJECTION TO APPELLANTS' DECEMBER 28, 2021 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2021-12-28
Type Motions Extensions
Subtype Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
Description Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2021-12-21
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 7 DAYS TO 12/28/2021
Docket Date 2021-12-21
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2021-12-06
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2021-12-06
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 15 DAYS TO 12/21/2021
Docket Date 2021-11-04
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 12/04/2021
Docket Date 2021-11-04
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2021-10-05
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
Description Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2021-10-05
Type Order
Subtype Order on Agreed Extension of Time
Description Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 11/04/2021
Docket Date 2021-09-27
Type Order
Subtype Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
Description ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ ORDERED that appellee’s September 24, 2021 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the record is supplemented to include the May 5, 2021 transcript. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
Docket Date 2021-09-27
Type Record
Subtype Supplemental Record
Description Supplemental Records
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2021-09-24
Type Motions Relating to Records
Subtype Motion to Supplement Record
Description Motion To File Supplemental Record
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2021-09-13
Type Record
Subtype Record on Appeal
Description Received Records ~ 1,325 PAGES
On Behalf Of Clerk - Broward
Docket Date 2021-09-09
Type Notice
Subtype Notice of Appearance
Description Notice of Appearance
On Behalf Of Franc Nemanic
Docket Date 2021-08-05
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
Description Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
On Behalf Of RadWeb Technologies, LLC
Docket Date 2021-07-28
Type Order
Subtype Order on Filing Fee
Description ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
Docket Date 2021-07-28
Type Misc. Events
Subtype Fee Status
Description FP:Fee Paid Through Portal

Documents

Name Date
WITHDRAWAL 2023-02-28
ANNUAL REPORT 2023-02-28
ANNUAL REPORT 2022-04-15
ANNUAL REPORT 2021-04-27
ANNUAL REPORT 2020-06-24
ANNUAL REPORT 2019-01-26
ANNUAL REPORT 2018-03-11
ANNUAL REPORT 2017-01-08
ANNUAL REPORT 2016-04-15
Foreign Limited 2015-06-05

Date of last update: 20 Jan 2025

Sources: Florida Department of State