PAUL HABER VS MICHAEL UHR and UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT LLC
|
4D2022-3356
|
2022-12-19
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE20-015819
|
Parties
Name |
Paul Haber
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Andrew T. Lavin
|
|
Name |
UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Michael Uhr
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Marko F. Cerenko, Alan J. Kluger, Shannon Dobel
|
|
Name |
Hon. Sandra Perlman
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2023-02-27
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-27
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the February 24, 2023 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-16
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant's February 15, 2023 motion for extension is granted, and the time to comply with this court’s February 7, 2023 order is extended to February 24, 2023.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-15
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-07
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order
|
Description |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ Upon consideration of the appellant's January 3, 2022 jurisdictional brief, it is ORDERED that the parties are to show cause within ten (10) days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed in light of the trial court's June 15, 2022 order transferring the claims in the verified complaint to Delaware.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-03
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix ~ TO JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-03
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the November 17, 2022 order is an appealable final or nonfinal order, as it appears the order merely dismisses a counterclaim. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) ("A partial final judgment, other than one that disposes of an entire case as to any party, is one that disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims."); Dennis v. Pavlakos, 464 So. 2d 1323, 1324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) ("An order dismissing a compulsory counterclaim is a non-final, non-appealable order."). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-19
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-19
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
|
MICHAEL UHR and UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT, LLC VS PAUL HABER, et al.
|
4D2022-1937
|
2022-07-18
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE20-015819 (04)
|
Parties
Name |
UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT LLC
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
CROSS CHARTERING YACHT TRANSPORT LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Hon. Sandra Perlman
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Michael Uhr
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Alan J. Kluger, Marko F. Cerenko, Lauren S. Fallick
|
|
Name |
Bank of America, N.A.
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Paul Haber
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Andrew T. Lavin, Marc T. Parrino
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2023-03-22
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the March 21, 2023 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-03-22
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-03-21
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ AMENDED
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-27
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief on Merits ~ OF CROSS-APPELLANTS
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-27
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **Stricken**
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-27
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-18
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that cross-appellants’ December 19, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and cross-appellants shall serve the initial brief on or before January 20, 2023. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-19
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that cross-appellants’ December 16, 2022 motion for extension of time is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-19
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-16
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ **Stricken**
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-11-21
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that cross-appellants’ October 24, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and cross-appellants shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-11-09
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response ~ CROSS-APPELLEES' RESPONSE TO CROSS-APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO SERVE INITIAL BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Uhr
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-25
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
Description |
ORD-To File Response ~ ORDERED that cross-appellees are directed to respond, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, to cross-appellants’ October 24, 2022 motion for extension of time.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-24
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-30
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the September 29, 2022 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed. The cross appeal remains pending.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-29
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Uhr
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-23
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause
|
Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief/Apdx ~ ORDERED that appellants in the above-styled case are directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before October 3, 2022, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellants' initial brief and appendix have not been filed with this court as of this date, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(e). Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief and appendix are filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants’ August 5, 2022 amended motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief on or before September 16, 2022. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-05
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ AMENDED
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Uhr
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Uhr
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-04
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellants’ August 3, 2022 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-03
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ **Stricken**
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Uhr
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellants’ August 2, 2022 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-02
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ **Stricken**
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Uhr
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-02
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Cross Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Cross Appeal
|
On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-01
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Cross-Notice Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
CROSS NOTICE FILING FEE PAID THROUGH PORTAL
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-29
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Cross Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Cross Appeal
|
On Behalf Of |
Paul Haber
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-18
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
Michael Uhr
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-18
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-19
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-30
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that cross-appellants’ appendix to the cross initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and contains bookmarks which are not in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-19
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that cross-appellants’ January 18, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and cross-appellants shall serve the initial brief on or before January 27, 2023. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Cross-Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-01
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay filing Fee - Cross-Appeal - 10 days ~ A Notice of Cross-Appeal was filed in the lower tribunal on July 29, 2022. The $295.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED, appellee/cross-appellant shall pay the $295.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of the cross-appeal and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the notice of cross-appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the cross-appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-19
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
|
UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT, LLC VS MAS MARINE, INC.
|
4D2018-2580
|
2018-08-28
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE15-008578
|
Parties
Name |
UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT LLC
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Chase Alexandra Jansson, Neil Bayer
|
|
Name |
MAS MARINE, INC.
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Ron G. Rice
|
|
Name |
Hon. Carlos A. Rodriguez
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2018-08-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-06
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-12-06
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-11-14
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed
|
Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-07-31
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-07-25
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant’s July 22, 2019 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief on or before July 31, 2019. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-07-23
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion to Withdraw Filing
|
Description |
ORD-To Withdraw Pleadings ~ ORDERED that appellant's July 22, 2019 notice of withdrawal is treated as a motion to withdraw the July 22, 2019 motion to strike appellee’s amended appendix and is granted. Appellant’s July 22, 2019 motion to strike appellee’s amended appendix is considered withdrawn.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-07-22
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice
|
Description |
Notice ~ OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLEE'S APPENDIX
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-07-22
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-07-22
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
Description |
Motion To Strike ~ APPELLEE'S AMENDED APPENDIX***WITHDRAWN SEE 7/23/19 ORDER***
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-14
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MAS MARINE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellee's appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-11
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ *** STRICKEN 6/12/19***
|
On Behalf Of |
MAS MARINE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-11
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MAS MARINE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
ORD-Stricken ~ ORDERED that the appellee’s answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 in that it does not list issues for review; further,ORDERED that the appellee's appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not properly indexed and consecutively paginated, beginning with the cover sheet as page 1, was not text searchable, was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index, and was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended brief and appendix in compliance with the rules shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The time for any responsive briefing shall be tolled until service of this amended brief.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-04
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ ***STRICKEN 6/5/19***
|
On Behalf Of |
MAS MARINE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-06-04
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ ***STRICKEN 6/5/19***
|
On Behalf Of |
MAS MARINE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-04-09
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 40 DAYS TO 5/30/19
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-04-09
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-03-04
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 45 DAYS TO 4/20/19
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-03-04
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
MAS MARINE, INC.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-11
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-08
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not text searchable. An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-07
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ ***STRICKEN 2/8/19***
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-04
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2019-02-04
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ ***STRICKEN 2/5/19***
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-19
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ 443 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 90 DAYS TO 2/5/19
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-11-05
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-10-22
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to File Status Report
|
Description |
Order for Status Report Re: ROA ~ Upon consideration of the Affidavit of Non-Payment of Appeal Invoice filed by the clerk of the lower tribunal on October 12, 2018, appellant is ordered to file a report within ten (10) days from the date of this order, as to the status of the preparation of the record on appeal.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-10-12
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Affidavit
|
Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-08-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-08-29
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-08-28
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD. VS UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT, LLC
|
4D2017-2965
|
2017-09-25
|
Closed
|
|
Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE 15 007859 (12)
|
Parties
Name |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
ROBERT RALPH JIMENEZ, ELIO F. MARTINEZ, JR.
|
|
Name |
UNITED YACHT TRANSPORT LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
Chase Alexandra Jansson, Neil Bayer
|
|
Name |
Hon. Michael L. Gates
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Hon. Lawrence M. Mirman
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
Clerk - Broward
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2018-11-16
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-10-25
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
Description |
ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that the appellant's October 8, 2018 motion for issuance of written opinion is denied; further,ORDERED that appellant's October 8, 2018 motion to stay mandate pending motion for issuance of written opinion is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-10-25
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-10-18
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
Response
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-10-08
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
Description |
Motion To Stay Issuance of Mandate
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-09-27
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed
|
Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-07-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Dispensing with Oral Argument
|
Description |
ORD-Dispensing Oral Argument ~ After reviewing the briefs, the court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320, has dispensed with oral argument. The case will be submitted to a conference by a panel of the court.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-05-23
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-05-23
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-04-20
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Reply Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Reply Brief ~ 30 DAYS TO 5/23/18.
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-04-02
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-03-19
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's March 16, 2018 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before March 30, 2018. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-03-16
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-02-19
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's February 16, 2018 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before March 19, 2018. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-02-16
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
United Yacht Transport, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-18
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ ORDERED that the appellant's appendix to the initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not bookmarked in compliance with Rule 9.220(c)(3). An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-18
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-16
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Appendix
|
Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2018-01-16
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-11-20
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ (572 PAGES)
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-11-17
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief ~ 45 DAYS TO 1/15/18.
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-11-13
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Affidavit
|
Description |
Affidavit ~ OF NON-PAYMENT OF APPEAL INVOICE.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-09-27
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-09-27
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-09-25
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
Docket Date |
2017-09-25
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
SAITAMA KANKON SOUSAI CENTER CO., LTD.
|
|
|