| Docket Date |
2021-10-11
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike ~ APPELLEE GMF-STONYBROOK, LLC'S MOTION TO STRIKE APPELLANTS' REPLY BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant's September 20, 2021 reply brief as to Paladin Security, LLC is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellants’ September 7, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the reply brief as to appellee GMF-Stonybrook within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee, or a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status, did not accompany the Notice of Appeal as required in Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.140(a). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a circuit court clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Strike ~ ORDERED that appellee GMF-Stonybrook, LLC's October 11, 2021 motion to strike appellants’ reply brief is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-30
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-06
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Rehearing ~ ORDERED that appellants’ November 12, 2021 motion for rehearing is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-29
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ OF PALADIN SECURITY LLC TO MOTION FOR REHEARING
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-12
|
| Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-28
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-21
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief ~ AS TO GMF-STONYBROOK LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-20
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief ~ **STRICKEN** AS TO PALADIN SECURITY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF ATTEMPT TO CONTACT REFERENCE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TOFILE REPLY BRIEF AS TO GMF-STONYBROOK
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Reply Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellants’ September 8, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellants shall serve the reply brief as to appellee Paladin Security, LLC within ten (10) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it will be subject to being stricken, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the reply brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-08
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ AS TO GMF-STONYBROOK
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Reply Brief ~ AS TO GMF-STONYBROOK LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 15 DAYS TO 8/24/21
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-27
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ GMF-STONYBROOK, LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-26
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief ~ PALADIN SECURITY LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ TO 07/28/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-07-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ GMF-STONYBROOK, LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 07/26/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief ~ PALADIN SECURITY LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ Upon consideration of appellants' June 1, 2021 response, it is ORDERED that appellee, GMF-StonyBrook, LLC's May 28, 2021 motion to dismiss is denied. Appellants' initial brief is deemed filed as of May 28, 2021.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-01
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APPELLEE GMF STONYBROOK, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS, etc.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss ~ APPELLANTS' INITIAL BRIEF FOR FAILURE TO SERVE APPELLEE, OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION TO DEEM THE INITIAL BRIEF SERVED AS OF MAY 28, 2021, AND FOR SANCTIONS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-28
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 06/25/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 05/26/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-09
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Order Granting Voluntary Dismissal ~ Pursuant to the March 8, 2021 notice of voluntary dismissal, this case is dismissed as to appellee Ledic Management Group, LLC only.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
| Description |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ~ AS TO LEDIC MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 60 DAYS TO 03/29/2021
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-01-07
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 268 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-26
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-25
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-23
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-20
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Paladin Security, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-11-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Tara Holmes
|
|
