| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Mandamus
|
| Court |
2nd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County
19-CA-2171
|
Parties
| Name |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
| Role |
Petitioner
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
KENNETH W. FERGUSON, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L.L.C.
|
| Role |
Respondent
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Garrett Tozier, Esq., S. ELIZABETH KING, ESQ., DANIEL E. NORDBY, ESQ, ERIC S. ADAMS, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
STEVEN SCOTT STEPHENS, ESQ.
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HILLSBOROUGH CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2020-06-19
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
Denied - Order by Judge ~ SLEET, LUCAS, and ATKINSON
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-19
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Closed
|
| Description |
Case Closed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The respondent's motion to convert mandamus petition into final appeal and motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction as untimely filed are treated as a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. The petitioner's response to those motions is treated as the reply to the response to the petition. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. To the extent that they seek relief beyond this disposition, the respondent's motions are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-19
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Denied
|
| Description |
denial of mandamus ~ The respondent's motion to convert mandamus petition into final appeal and motion to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction as untimely filed are treated as a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. The petitioner's response to those motions is treated as the reply to the response to the petition.The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. To the extent that they seek relief beyond this disposition, the respondent's motions are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-06-12
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ TO MOTION TO CONVERT AND DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
MISCELLANEOUS ORDER ~ The petitioner shall respond to the respondent's motion to convert and motion to dismiss within 15 days of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-26
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT ~ RESPONDENT'S (1) MOTION TO CONVERT MANDAMUS PETITION INTO FINAL APPEAL AND (2) MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AS UNTIMELY FILED
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-05-26
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ RESPONDENT'S (1) MOTION TO CONVERT MANDAMUS PETITION INTO FINAL APPEAL AND (2) MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AS UNTIMELY FILED
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Respond to Petition
|
| Description |
mandamus - generic response/reply ~ Respondent shall serve a response to the petition for writ of mandamus within 30 days. Petitioner may serve a reply within 30 days thereafter.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-22
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-21
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-04-21
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition Mandamus
|
| Description |
Petition Mandamus
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
|
| Classification |
Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Certiorari
|
| Court |
2nd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County
19-CA-2171
|
Parties
| Name |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
KENNETH W. FERGUSON, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L.L.C.
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
S. ELIZABETH KING, ESQ., JOSEPH W. BAIN, ESQ., Garrett Tozier, Esq., ERIC S. ADAMS, ESQ.
|
|
| Name |
STEVEN SCOTT STEPHENS, ESQ.
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
HILLSBOROUGH CLERK
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2020-06-03
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Closed
|
| Description |
Case Closed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-23
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Objection
|
| Description |
OBJECTION ~ RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FORREHEARING, CLARIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION WITH INCORPORATED MOTION TO VACATE TRIAL COURT ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-12
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Reconsideration/Rehearing of an Order
|
| Description |
Motion For Rehearing on an Order ~ MOTION FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION WITH INCORPORATED MOTION TO VACATE TRIAL COURT ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-27
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ LaRose, Sleet, and Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ IN OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT'S SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-17
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-14
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ RESPONDENT'S SUGGESTION OF MOOTNESS
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-01-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ Petitioner's motion to strike response and appendix is denied. Petitioner may serve a reply to the response to the petition for writ of certiorari within thirty days. Respondent's motion to strike petition and appendix, and alternative "motion correct respondent's supplemental appendix to its response to the petition" are denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-17
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONDENT'S (1) RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STRIKE; (2) ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO STRIKE PETITIONER'S PETITION AND APPENDIX; AND (3) ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CORRECT RESPONDENT'S SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX TO ITS RESPONSE TO THE PETITION
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-02
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
| Description |
Motion To Strike
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-12-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Motion
|
| Description |
ALL OTHER MOTIONS APPENDIX/ATTACHMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-20
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-11-20
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
SHIV SHRADDHA, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Respond to Petition
|
| Description |
certiorari response - pretrial ~ Respondent shall serve a response to the petition for writ of certiorari within 30 days. Petitioner may serve a reply within 30 days thereafter. The parties shall keep this court apprised of all hearings or trial dates that may affect this proceeding.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-17
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-16
|
| Type |
Petition
|
| Subtype |
Petition
|
| Description |
Petition Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-16
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
ORIGINAL APPENDIX OR ATTACHMENT ~ SEEKS MANDAMUS
|
| On Behalf Of |
POINT CONVERSIONS, L L C
|
|
| Docket Date |
2019-10-16
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-03-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
| Description |
denial of writ rehearing ~ The petitioner's “motion for rehearing, clarification, and certification with incorporated motion to vacate trial court order” is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2020-02-27
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
certiorari dismissed ~ Respondent's suggestion of mootness is well-taken. The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Curry v. State, 880 So. 2d 751, 756 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(f) does not apply to certiorari proceedings); see also Casper & Friends, Inc. v. Nelson, 915 So.2d 646, 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) ("The filing of a petition for certiorari in this court did not stay the circuit court appellate proceeding . . . ."); Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust v. Schacht, 220 So. 3d 1234, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding that "[a]bsent a stay, the filing of [a petition for writ of certiorari] has no effect on the lower court's ability to proceed to adjudicate the case.").
|
|
|
