|
347413502
|
0420600
|
2024-04-15
|
2212 OASIS PALM CIRCLE BUILDING #4, CAPE CORAL, FL, 33991
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2024-04-15
|
| Emphasis |
N: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1741827 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
2151639 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 A02 |
| Issuance Date |
2024-04-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2024-05-23 |
| Current Penalty |
4258.8 |
| Initial Penalty |
7098.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-05-22 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
13 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(a)(2): The employer did not determine if the walking/working surfaces on which its employees were to work on, had the strength and structure integrity to support employees safely: a. On or about April 15, 2024, at 2212 Oasis Palm Circle, Building #4, Cape Coral, Florida, 33991, employees were walking up and down four flights of job made stairs, wherein the stairs were constructed onsite without the use of engineering data/architectural drawings, during which time the third floor and second floor stairs collapsed; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazards. b. On or about April 15, 2024, at 2212 Oasis Palm Circle, Building #5, Cape Coral, Florida, 33991, employees were walking up and down four flights of job made stairs, wherein the stairs were constructed onsite without the use of engineering data/architectural drawings; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazards. c. On or about April 15, 2024, at 2212 Oasis Palm Circle, Building #6, Cape Coral, Florida, 33991, employees were walking up and down four flights of job made stairs, wherein the stairs were constructed onsite without the use of engineering data/architectural drawings; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazards. |
|
|
|
347118770
|
0419700
|
2023-11-21
|
12175 PHILIPS HIGHWAY, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32256
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2023-11-21
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET, P: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2024-11-21
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1711871 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2024-03-19 |
| Current Penalty |
2766.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4610.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-04-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: 1. Located at 12175 Philips Highway Jacksonville, Florida, 32256. On or about November 21, 2023, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was being used when employees were exposed to struck by injuries while using battery powered nail guns. |
|
|
|
346262108
|
0420600
|
2022-10-05
|
801 MAIN ST, DUNEDIN, FL, 34697
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-10-05
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2024-10-10
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1953797 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-12-16 |
| Current Penalty |
2900.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
5801.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-01-13 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) At the site, on or about 10/5/2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 10 ft, in that guardrails on the second and third floor were taken down and not put back up while employees were working in the area. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-12-16 |
| Current Penalty |
2900.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
5801.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-01-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) At the site, on or about 10/5/2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 32 ft, in that employees were performing decking work on roofs with no fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-12-16 |
| Current Penalty |
2486.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4972.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-01-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. (a) At the site, on or about 10/5/2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that the ladder used to access the roof did not extend at least 3 ft over the leading edge and no grasping device was provided to assist employees in dismounting. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-12-16 |
| Current Penalty |
2486.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4972.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-01-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: (a) At the site, on or about 10/5/2022, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, the top step of an A-frame ladder was used as a step to access the roof of Building B. |
|
|
