| Docket Date |
2023-05-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s May 19, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant has fifteen (15) days from the date of this order to file a conformed copy of the order being appealed in compliance with this court’s May 2, 2023 order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-19
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| On Behalf Of |
Carlos Villanueva
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Change of Address
|
| Description |
Notice of Change of Address
|
| On Behalf Of |
Carlos Villanueva
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court’s subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the April 26, 2023 order is a final or nonfinal appealable order, as it states the dismissal is without prejudice. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110; U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Rodriguez, 206 So. 3d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (“Generally, when an order dismisses a complaint ‘without prejudice,’ that language signifies that the order is not a final order.”) (quoting Al-Hakim v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., 161 So. 3d 568, 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-12
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Order Appealed
|
| Description |
Order Appealed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Carlos Villanueva
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant’s June 28, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant has fifteen (15) days from the date of this order to respond to this court’s June 21, 2023 order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-28
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| On Behalf Of |
Carlos Villanueva
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause re Compliance with Prior Order
|
| Description |
Order to Show Cause-Appeal Dismissal ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed or other sanctions imposed for failure to comply with this court’s May 22, 2023 order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-27
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-27
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document
|
| Description |
Misc. LT pleadings ~ Civil Cover Sheet
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Carlos Villanueva
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-07
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED sua sponte that this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110; Al-Hakim v. Big Lots Stores, Inc., 161 So. 3d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (“Generally, when an order dismisses a complaint ‘without prejudice,’ that language signifies that the order is not a final order.”); see also Bushweiler v. Levine, 476 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (dismissing appeal from an order dismissing case without prejudice because it failed to contain “magic words demonstrating finality” and did not qualify under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130 as an appealable non-final order); Liebman v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Code Compliance Office, 54 So. 3d 1043 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“We lack jurisdiction to review the two orders granting motions to dismiss the complaint without prejudice to amend. These orders are non-final and non-appealable.”).KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Amended/Additional Filing(s) Needed
|
| Description |
Appellant to File Order Appealed-Civil ~ ORDERED that appellant is directed to file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the order being appealed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d). This copy must contain a legible stamp from the clerk of the lower tribunal, showing the date and time the order being appealed was filed in that office.
|
|
