Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2024-05-07
|
Emphasis |
N: FALL, P: FALL
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2024-05-20 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-07-09 |
Current Penalty |
2305.0 |
Initial Penalty |
4610.0 |
Final Order |
2024-06-04 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. a) On or about May 7, 2024, at the jobsite, the employer did not enforce the use of safety glasses, while employees used a nail gun to install decking, exposing employees to struck by hazards. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2024-05-20 |
Current Penalty |
2305.0 |
Initial Penalty |
4610.0 |
Final Order |
2024-06-04 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) On or about May 7, 2024, at the jobsite, the employer's ladder was only extended approximately 2 feet past the roof landing, while being used to gain access to a roof 20'6" high, with a pitch of 5/12, to install decking, exposing employees to fall hazards. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2024-05-20 |
Current Penalty |
4609.5 |
Initial Penalty |
9219.0 |
Final Order |
2024-06-04 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about May 7, 2024, at the jobsite, the employer did not enforce the use of fall protection, while employees installed decking on a 20'6" high roof, with a pitch of 5/12 exposing employees to fall hazards. Almazanes Remodeling LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1726530, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/26/2024, with respect to a workplace located at 16302-16332 Hamlin Hills Bldg. 8, Winter Garden, FL 34787. |
|
Citation ID |
03001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19260503 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2024-05-20 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-07-09 |
Current Penalty |
129.5 |
Initial Penalty |
259.0 |
Final Order |
2024-06-04 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) On or about May 7, 2024, at the jobsite: the employer did not prepare and maintain a written fall protection training program certification for employees exposed to fall hazards of 20'6" while working on the roof. Almazanes Remodeling LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1726530, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on 03/26/2024, with respect to a workplace located at 16302-16332 Hamlin Hills Bldg. 8, Winter Garden, FL 34787. |
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2024-02-07
|
Emphasis |
N: FALL, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2024-05-13
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2024-03-15 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-04-03 |
Current Penalty |
2074.2 |
Initial Penalty |
3457.0 |
Final Order |
2024-03-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about February 7, 2024, at work site: employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet, in that they were allowed to work on top of the concrete walls of building 8 without fall protection. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2024-03-15 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-04-03 |
Current Penalty |
2488.8 |
Initial Penalty |
4148.0 |
Final Order |
2024-03-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: a) On or about February 7,2024, at worksite: employees were exposed to an approximate 10 fall hazard, in that the employer did not provide fall protection training. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100178 L04 III |
Issuance Date |
2024-03-15 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2024-03-26 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: a) On or about 2/7/2024 at worksite: Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in that an employee was allowed to operate the JLG 6042 Telehandler who hasn't been re-evaluated since 3/3/2020. |
|
|