|
342618352
|
0419700
|
2017-09-06
|
104 MANOR LANE LOT 15, SAINT JOHNS, FL, 32259
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-10-10
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-06-08
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1261800 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-10-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-12-08 |
| Current Penalty |
1630.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1630.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-21 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a) On or about September 6, 2017: an employees was observed on the roof trusses at the back of the house cutting the ends of the trusses with a circular saw and was not wearing safety glasses, the employee was exposed to eye injuries. b) On or about September 6, 2017: two employees were observed on the roof trusses at the peak of the house installing wood elements on trusses with pneumatic nail guns and were not wearing safety glasses, the employees were exposed to eye injuries. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-10-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-12-08 |
| Current Penalty |
7605.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
7605.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-21 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about September 6, 2017: two employees were observed on the roof trusses at the back of the house cutting the ends of the trusses to install the fascia and were not protected by guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employees were exposed to a 12-feet fall hazard. b) On or about September 6, 2017: two employees were observed on the roof trusses at the peak of the house installing wood elements on trusses and were not protected by guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employees were exposed to a 16-feet fall hazard. Hernandez Drywall, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1229379, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on July 17, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 128 Paradise Valley Drive Ponte Vedra, FL 32081. Hernandez Drywall, LLC previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1224639, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on September 20, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 88 Miranda Place Saint Johns, FL 32259. |
|
| Citation ID |
03001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-10-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-12-08 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-11-21 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) On or about September 6, 2017: Employees were installing wood framing elements on roof trusses and cutting truss ends on a residential structure and were exposed to a fall hazards of 12 to 18-feet and the fall protection training certification was not provided. |
|
| Citation ID |
04001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19030019 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2018-06-13 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2018-07-31 |
| Current Penalty |
311.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
311.0 |
| Final Order |
2018-09-05 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Imminent Danger |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) On or about June 12, 2018 the employer has failed to provide verification of abatement for below citation and penalty 29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a) On or about September 6, 2017: Employees were installing wood framing elements on roof trusses and cutting truss ends on a residential structure and were exposed to a fall hazards of 12 to 18-feet and the fall protection training certification was not provided. |
|
|
|
342293792
|
0419700
|
2017-05-01
|
128 PARADISE VALLEY DRIVE, PONTE VEDRA, FL, 32081
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-05-01
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2020-10-15
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-05-05 |
| Current Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3803.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a. On or about May 1, 2017, employees were working in the trusses without a fall protection system, exposed to a 19.5-foot fall hazard. |
|
|
|
342246394
|
0419700
|
2017-04-11
|
88 MIRINDA PLACE, SAINT JOHNS, FL, 32259
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-04-12
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-04-19
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-03 |
| Current Penalty |
2607.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
4346.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-09-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, a personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure as provided by another provision in paragraph (b) of this section: a. On or about April 11, 2017, on the 4:12 pitch roof on the right side of the house, two employees installing lathing were exposed to an 11 feet fall hazard from the eave in that they were not protected by a fall protection system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-03 |
| Current Penalty |
2607.5 |
| Initial Penalty |
4346.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-09-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a. On or about April 11, 2017, on the right side of the house, the roof access ladder did not extend 3 feet above the roof eave at the upper landing surface of the roof, exposing lathing installation employees to an 11 feet fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-03 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-09-20 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: a. On or about April 11, 2017, on the right side of the 4:12 pitch first-story roof, a folded step ladder was leaned against the second-story wall, and it was used to install lathing on the upper areas of that wall, exposing employees to a 15 feet fall hazard over the eave. b. On or about April 11, 2017, on the left side of the 4:12 pitch first story roof, a folded step ladder was leaned against the second-story wall, and it was used to install lathing on the upper areas of that wall, exposing employees to an 11 feet fall hazard over the eave. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B06 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-03 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-09-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level: a. On or about April 11, 2017, on the right rear of the 4:12 pitch first-story roof the feet of a step ladder were placed down the slope of the roof in an unstable manner exposing an employee on the step ladder to a 15 feet fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-03 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-22 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-09-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. On or about April 11, 2017, employees installing lathing from elevations where they were exposed to fall hazards had not been trained to select and install appropriate anchor systems for personal fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B16 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-08-03 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-09-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: A. On or about April 11, 2017, on the left side of the house, a 20-foot Werner aluminum extension ladder had a broken foot on the bottom of the right base section rail, and it had not been removed from service. |
|
|
