| Docket Date |
2018-02-01
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Returned Exhibits
|
| Description |
Returned Exhibits
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-11-15
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-11-15
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-19
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-10-04
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Appellant's Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-09-29
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's September 25, 2017 motion for extension of time is granted. The time for appellant to file a reply brief is extended to October 9, 2017.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-09-25
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-08-22
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
STATE OF FLORIDA
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-08-03
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-07-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before August 7, 2017, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-06-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 13, 2017 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-06-13
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-05-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant Mot. to w/draw, aplnt file brief 30 days ~ ORDERED that appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. See Mayolo v. State, 714 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Jones v. State, 69 So. 3d 329, 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Further,ORDERED that appellant has thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file a pro se initial brief, with further briefing as provided by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(3)(C). Failure to file a pro se initial brief within the time permitted will result in the dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution; further,ORDERED that the public defender's May 9, 2017 motion for extension of time is moot.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-05-11
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion To Withdraw as Counsel
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-05-09
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-03-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief ~ 60 DAYS TO 5/9/17.
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2017-01-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Initial Brief ~ 60 DAYS TO 3/10/17.
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-12
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Exhibits
|
| Description |
Received Exhibits ~ ONE (1) ENVELOPE.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-12-09
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Upon consideration of appellant's November 14, 2016 response, this appeal shall proceed as timely filed, and is redesignated as an appeal from a non-summary order denying a rule 3.850 motion.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ **AND** AMENDED ORDER APPEALED
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
ORD-For Untimely Filing of Notice of Appeal-LT ~ The court has received the Notice of Appeal in the above-styled case and finds, from the face of the Notice, that the appeal appears to be untimely filed. The Notice was filed in the Lower Tribunal on November 7, 2016, and the Notice reflects July 27, 2016, as the date of the order being appealed.ORDERED that appellant is directed to file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the order(s) being appealed and any subsequent orders which tolled the time for the filing of the Notice of Appeal. Said orders must reflect the time/date stamp so that timeliness can be determined.ORDERED that failure to comply with this order will result in the sua sponte dismissal of the above-styled case as being an untimely appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-09
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-08
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Court Reporter Acknowledgement Letter
|
| Description |
Court Reporter Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-07
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
| Docket Date |
2016-11-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
DUSTIN HART
|
|
