| Docket Date |
2024-11-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance and Email Designation
|
| On Behalf Of |
Spotlight Residential Real Estate LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
ORDERED that appellant's October 9, 2024 motion to stay is treated as a motion for review and is denied. Everett v. Everett, 196 So. 3d 483, 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ("We review the lower tribunal's decision on the motion to stay under the 'highly deferential' abuse of discretion standard. . . . The idea is that the court most familiar with the controversy is in the best posture to determine the appropriateness and conditions of a stay."); Lampert-Sacher v. Sacher, 120 So. 3d 667, 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) ("A party seeking to stay the lower tribunal order pending appeal should demonstrate a likelihood of prevailing on appeal, irreparable harm to movant if the motion is not granted, or a showing that a stay would be in the public interest."). Further, ORDERED that appellant's motion to consolidate is denied..
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-06
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Docket Entry
|
| Description |
November 5, 2024 e-mail from Appellant
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-05
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
| Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-04
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| Description |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellant's October 28, 2024 motion is denied. Appellant is advised that his motion practice has abused the judicial process and burdened this court's limited judicial resources. Future excessive, unnecessary, and/or frivolous motion practice may result in the imposition of sanctions, including referral to The Florida Bar, under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410. Further, Appellant is advised that the $300.00 filing fee has not been paid. Failure to pay the filing fee will result in dismissal of this cause pursuant to this Court's October 16, 2024 order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-28
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice of Paid Filing Fee, Notice of Compliance with October 16, 2024 Order
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Motion for Order Requiring Clerk to Show Cause
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-21
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
ORDERED that the appellant's October 11, 2024 request for emergency treatment is denied. The court will handle the filing in the normal course of business. No motion for rehearing as to this order will be entertained.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-11
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
KEEGAN'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY CIRCUIT COURT PROCEEDINGS TO PRESERVE STATUS QUO PENDING APPEAL AND MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-08
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2025-01-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Inability
|
| Description |
Notice of Inability
|
| On Behalf Of |
Palm Beach Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2025-01-03
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Corrected Response in Opposition to Third Party Purchaser's Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
Mark Gerard Keegan *W*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2025-01-02
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
Mark Gerard Keegan *W*
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-06
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellee Spotlight Residential Real Estate, LLC's December 4, 2024 motion to relinquish jurisdiction and December 5, 2024 corrected motion to relinquish jurisdiction are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that they are computer-generated documents which do not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) ("Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font."). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-05
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Corrected Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-04
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| Description |
ORDERED that, pursuant to the stipulation for substitution of counsel filed December 3, 2024, the law firm of Ticktin Law Group is substituted for the law firm of Sasson Law as counsel for Appellee in the above-styled cause.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Parties and Counsel
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
| Description |
Motion For Substitution of Counsel
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
On November 5, 2024, Appellant sent an ex parte communication by email to three members of the court's staff whose email addresses are not publicly available on the court's website, in which he posed various questions concerning his case, none of which were related to the ruling set forth in the court's November 1, 2024 order. Specifically, Appellant requested that court staff identify an individual who may have worked on his case.
To the extent that Appellant had concerns for the court regarding his case, those concerns should have been raised in a proper pleading filed with the court and served on opposing counsel. Appellant's November 5, 2024 email to court staff constitutes conduct that may violate Rule 4-3.5 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, including the prohibition on ex parte communications.
The Clerk of this court is directed to place Appellant's email to court staff on the docket and provide a copy of the email to the court's Marshal. Appellant is advised that there is no requirement that any judge of this court affix a signature to an order and all the court's orders are certified with the Clerk's signature, consistent with the practice in all six Florida district courts of appeal as well as the Florida Supreme Court. The court notes that Appellant is a member of the Florida Bar who has handled multiple appeals in Florida's appellate courts; as a result, Appellant should be well aware of this practice. Finally, the "*w*" notation next to the Appellant's name in the service list indicates that Appellant has been previously warned by the court.
Therefore, it is ORDERED that Appellant shall stop the practice of sending ex parte communications directly to individual members of the court staff. Further instances of improper ex parte communications by Appellant to court staff may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to a finding of contempt and/or referral to the Florida Bar for disciplinary proceedings.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2024), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY. ORDERED, Appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of the entry of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal - see the court's website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. If Appellant has already been found indigent for purposes of proceedings in the lower tribunal, in this case, Appellant shall file a copy of that order in this court. If Appellant does not have an order or a determination of indigent status and believes that he or she is insolvent, Appellant shall complete the enclosed application and mail to the clerk of the lower tribunal within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. A Notice of Compliance that you have applied for indigent status, must also be filed with this court. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall forward the Clerk's Determination to this court within ten (10) days of receipt. Failure of Appellant to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this appeal. **NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
