Docket Date |
2023-06-09
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Article I, Section 16(b)(10)b., Fla. Const. Order - Time Expired
|
Description |
Case Initiated After Time Expired
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-04-18
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Closed
|
Description |
Case Closed
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-03-22
|
Type |
Disposition
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and BLACK
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-03-22
|
Type |
Disposition by Order
|
Subtype |
Dismissed
|
Description |
ORD-SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL ~ This appeal is dismissed based on Appellant's failure to file the initial brief as directed by this court's February 17, 2023, order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-02-17
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
Description |
Brief Overdue ~ Appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty days from the date of this order, or this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice based on failure to prosecute.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-30
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document ~ lt motion for appointment of counsel PS DEVIN SMITH T48804
|
On Behalf Of |
DEVIN SMITH
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-04
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 35 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-03
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
DEVIN SMITH
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-20
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
Description |
Order for Immediate Filing of Brief ~ Appellant's initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-12
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shallbe served within 60 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-11
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
On Behalf Of |
DEVIN SMITH
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-07
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ SISCO - CORRECTED - REDACTED - 506 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-06
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ SISCO - REDACTED - 506 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-08-01
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
Description |
deny eot as premature; non-summary ~ The appellant's motion for extension of time to serve the initial brief is denied as premature. The initial brief is not due until 30 days after service of the record on appeal, which has not yet occurred. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(3)(C).
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-29
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
DEVIN SMITH
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-29
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Right to Counsel Order
|
Description |
pro se nonsummary order ~ This appears to be a pro se appeal from an order denying a postconviction motion after evidentiary hearing. Appellant is advised that there may be a right to the appointment of counsel. See Beliveau v. State, 144 So. 3d 634, 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); see also Graham v. State, 372 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1979); Rowe v. State, 777 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).If appellant cannot afford to hire an attorney and wishes the assistance of counsel on this appeal, appellant may file a motion in the trial court "requesting the appointment of counsel and explaining the reasons why due process considerations warrant the appointment." Beliveau, 144 So. 3d at 637 (presenting a nonexhaustive list of factors to be considered). If appellant has not been determined to be indigent by the trial court, such a motion should be accompanied by an affidavit of insolvency.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-29
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-28
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
NF1:No Fee-3.850
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-28
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ MBR
|
On Behalf Of |
DEVIN SMITH
|
|