| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County
CACE22-005125
|
Parties
| Name |
VANTIFF LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Scott C. Gherman
|
|
| Name |
FVP Opportunity Fund III, LP
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
Amanda Leigh Klopp, Bradford M Cohen, Jerrell A Breslin, Jonathan Noah Schwartz, Michael James McMullen
|
|
| Name |
FVP INVESTMENTS, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
FVP SERVICING, LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Broward Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Jack Ben Tuter, Jr.
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2024-11-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal Confidential
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal Confidential Pages 33,171-33,172
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vantiff, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellant's November 14, 2024 response is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f).
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-14
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response to Order to Show Cause
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vantiff, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause for Brief or Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that the record on appeal has not been filed with this court as of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the record on appeal is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-09-05
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| Description |
Paid Case Filing Fee-300
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vantiff, LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-29
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-08-29
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORDERED that, upon consideration of Appellant's December 12, 2024 response, this court's December 5, 2024 order to show cause is discharged. Further, ORDERED that Appellant's motion for extension of time, contained in the response, is granted, and Appellant shall serve the initial brief within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-13
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Appellant's Response to Court's Order to Show Cause Dated December 5, 2024 and Motion for Extension of Time to File Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Vantiff, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause for Brief or Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
ORDERED that Appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that Appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of the date of this order. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
