|
347674947
|
0418800
|
2024-08-08
|
9011 DAHLIA CIRCLE, LOT 83, PORT SAINT LUCIE, FL, 34986
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2024-08-08
|
| Emphasis |
N: FALL, P: FALL
|
|
|
347638876
|
0419730
|
2024-07-23
|
4005-4013 DIJON DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL, 32808
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2024-07-23
|
| Emphasis |
N: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2024-12-21
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1763886 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
2190273 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2024-10-31 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2024-11-27 |
| Current Penalty |
2903.4 |
| Initial Penalty |
4839.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-12-31 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) a. On or about July 23, 2024, at the site: employees were exposed to an approximate 16 foot fall hazard, in that no fall protection (not tied off) was used while working on a 6:12 pitched roof removing and installing roof shingles. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2024-10-31 |
| Current Penalty |
2074.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
3457.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-12-31 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. On or about July 23, 2024, at the site: employees were exposed to an approximate 16 foot fall hazard when accessing and exiting the 6:12 pitched roof, in that, the side rails only extended approximately 4 inches past the roof landing. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2024-10-31 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-19 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-12-31 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record. a. On or about July 23, 2024, the employer did not provide written fall protection training certificates for employees exposed to an approximate 16 foot fall hazard while installing shingles on a 6:12 pitched roof. |
|
|
|
347117277
|
0419730
|
2023-11-20
|
3470 ARAMORE ROAD, SE LOT 114, PALM BAY, FL, 32909
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2023-11-20
|
| Emphasis |
P: FALL, N: FALL
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-12-26 |
| Current Penalty |
2009.4 |
| Initial Penalty |
3349.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a). On or about November 20, 2023, at the site, employer did not enforce the use of fall protection in that, employees installing meal drip cap on a one story roof, 9 feet high, 12/4 pitch, were not protected by any means of personal fall protection, exposing employees to 9 feet fall hazard. |
|
|
