| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-02
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before February 21, 2022, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ ORDERED that appellant’s November 1, 2021 filing is treated as the jurisdictional brief. Further, ORDERED that appellee’s October 26, 2021 motion to dismiss is denied in part, and this appeal shall proceed as to only the August 3, 2021 order. Further, ORDERED that appellee’s October 26, 2021 motion to dismiss is granted in part, and this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to only the August 17, 2021 order. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974).CONNER, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-11-01
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Alfraydo Cummings
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward Multifamily LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-26
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
Broward Multifamily LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-15
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Grant Extension of Time ~ ORDERED that appellant's October 14, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and the time in which to respond to this court’s August 26, 2021 order is extended ten (10) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-14
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| On Behalf Of |
Alfraydo Cummings
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-28
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - No or Noncompliant Cert. of Service ~ ORDERED that appellant's September 27, 2021 motion is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d) in that there is no certificate of service or the certificate of service does not comply in substance with the requirements of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516(f). You are notified of the requirement to serve the appellee with a copy of everything you file with this court and to indicate in the certificate of service that you served the appellee and the address at which they were served.Appellant may re-file the document with a proper certificate of service which indicates service on the appellee within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-27
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time ~ ***STRICKEN 9/28/21***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Alfraydo Cummings
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the August 3, 2021 and August 17, 2021 orders are appealable final orders under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110, as the writ of possession is stayed with the lower tribunal and the August 17, 2021 order indicates there is further judicial labor required in the lower tribunal. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97, 99 (Fla. 1974) (“Generally, the test employed by the appellate court to determine finality of an order, judgment or decree is whether the order in question constitutes an end to the judicial labor in the cause, and nothing further remains to be done by the court to effectuate a termination of the cause as between the parties directly affected.”). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-26
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 138 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Broward
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document
|
| Description |
Misc. LT pleadings ~ *Civil Cover Sheet
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Alfraydo Cummings
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-24
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
