| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Family - Other
|
| Court |
4th District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County
502017DR004338
|
Parties
| Name |
ROXANNA SOTO, PLLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Dina Keever-Agrama
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Frank D. Soto
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
David M. Scott
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-06-22
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-22
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-05-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Upon consideration of appellant's April 27, 2021 filing, it is ORDERED that the above-styled appeal is deemed timely filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-27
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ REGARDING APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF APPEALS SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 19, 2021 AND FEBRUARY 22, 2021
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-22
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO APRIL 12, 2021 ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Roxanna Soto
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-12
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response
|
| Description |
ORD-Appellant to File Response ~ Upon consideration of appellant's April 8, 2021 amended notice of appeal, it is ORDERED that appellant is directed to file, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, copies of the February 19, 2021 "Original filing submitted and received 2/19/2021 09:36:55 PM - Reference number 121757477" and February 22, 2021 "Filing moved to Correction Queue 2/22/2021 12:37:48 PM - In reference to Indigent Status" filings referred to in appellant's filing.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-04-08
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Amended Notice of Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Roxanna Soto
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-22
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-06-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-03-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
ORD-For Untimely Filing of Notice of Appeal-LT ~ The court has received the Notice of Appeal in the above-styled case and finds, from the face of the Notice, that the appeal appears to be untimely filed. The Notice was filed in the Lower Tribunal on March 17, 2021, and the Notice reflects February 9, 2021, as the date of the order being appealed.ORDERED that appellant is directed to file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order, a conformed copy of the order(s) being appealed and any subsequent orders which tolled the time for the filing of the Notice of Appeal. Said orders must reflect the time/date stamp so that timeliness can be determined.ORDERED that failure to comply with this order will result in the sua sponte dismissal of the above-styled case as being an untimely appeal.
|
|
|
