| Docket Date |
2024-11-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
| Description |
Appellant's Response filed on November 18, 2024, to this Court's Show Cause Order is noted.
Upon consideration of the Response, the Rule to Show Cause issued by this Court on October 25, 2024, is hereby carried with the case.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Iberte, S.R.O.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-18
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Appellant's Response to Show Cause Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Eco Green International LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Show Cause Order is hereby granted to and including November 18, 2024. Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-30
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Show Cause Order
|
| On Behalf Of |
Eco Green International LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-14
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Eco Green International LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-07
|
| Type |
Event
|
| Subtype |
Fee Satisfied
|
| Description |
Fee Satisfied
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing-Certificate of service.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Eco Green International LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-07
|
| Type |
Miscellaneous Document
|
| Subtype |
Pay Case Filing Fee-300
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee $300 paid through the portal. Batch # 12721029
|
| On Behalf Of |
Eco Green International LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
This is to notify counsel for appellant that the filing and prosecution of a notice of appeal in this Court is not acceptable without compliance with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Therefore, this appeal will be dismissed unless the required three hundred dollar ($300.00) fee is paid to the Clerk of the Court on or before October 14, 2024.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-04
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment of a New Case Letter. The 3DCA $300 filing fee for a notice of appeal is due.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-04
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal for 3D2024-1761. Incomplete certificate of service in NOA.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Eco Green International LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-19
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief-30 days to 01/13/2025 Granted
|
| On Behalf Of |
Eco Green International LLC
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-12-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Pursuant to the time schedule provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the time for filing the initial brief has expired. This cause will be subject to dismissal unless the document referred to is filed within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, or within said time the Court is otherwise notified that this matter is being diligently prosecuted.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-11-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Upon review of the record/affidavits filed in this case, the Court has determined that condensed transcripts fail to comply with the requirements of Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4) and 9.220(c)(4). Any such condensed transcripts filed after January 1, 2019, are hereby stricken. The responsible party (the party who seeks to have the transcripts considered by this Court) shall file transcripts that comply with the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2024-10-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to Show Cause - Contempt
|
| Description |
Inasmuch as the order being appealed grants a motion to dismiss the amended complaint as barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, as opposed to determining entitlement to arbitration, Appellant is ordered to show cause within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, as to why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Ebbit v. Terminix. Intern. Co. Ltd. P'ship, 792 So. 2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) ("The only rule which could possibly authorize this non-final appeal is Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), which allows non-final appeals to be taken from orders which determine the 'entitlement' of a party to arbitration. The use of the word 'entitlement' in the rule reflects that the rule was intended to authorize appeals from orders determining if a party has a right to arbitration."); see also Gomez v. S & I Props., LLC, 220 So. 3d 539, 541-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (an order denying a motion to dismiss a complaint based on an arbitration clause is not appealable on the ground that it effectively "determines" entitlement to arbitration); Infolink Group, Inc. v. Kurzweg, 10 So. 3d 201, 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (a nonfinal order confirming an arbitration award is not appealable); Cohen v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 121 So. 3d 1121, 1122, 1124 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (holding that an order denying relief from a previous order compelling arbitration was not an order determining entitlement).
|
| View |
View File
|
|
