|
346526411
|
0420600
|
2023-02-23
|
1299 SOUTH GOODMAN ROAD, CHAMPIONS GATE, FL, 33896
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2023-02-24
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2024-05-21
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
2002364 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2023-05-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2023-05-26 |
| Current Penalty |
2679.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2679.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-06-22 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i):Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary. (a) On or about February 23, 2023, at 1299 South Goodman Road, Champions Gate, FL: employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 6 feet 6 inches in that the spacing in between the individual walk planks and the spacing between the platform and the uprights was approximately 2.5 inches. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-05-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2023-05-26 |
| Current Penalty |
2679.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2679.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-06-22 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm) (a) On or about February 23, 2023, at 1299 South Goodman Road, Champions Gate, FL. employees were exposed to fall hazards in that individual walk planks extended approximately 4.5 inches over the center line of its support and were not cleated or otherwise restrained. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G04 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2023-05-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2023-06-12 |
| Current Penalty |
3349.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3349.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-06-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(vii):Each toprail or equivalent member of a guardrail system was not capable of withstanding, without failure, a force applied in any downward or horizontal direction at any point along its top edge of at least 100 pounds (445 n) or guardrail systems installed on single-point adjustable suspension scaffolds or two-point adjustable suspension scaffolds, and at least 200 pounds (890 n) for guardrail systems installed on all other scaffolds. (a) On or about February 23, 2023, at 1299 South Goodman Road, Champions Gate, FL. employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet 3 inches in that the scaffold guardrail system was erected in such a way that it was not capable of supporting at least 200 pounds. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2023-05-16 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2023-07-05 |
| Current Penalty |
9375.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
9375.0 |
| Final Order |
2023-06-22 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a):The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. (a) On or about February 23, 2023, at 1299 South Goodman Road, Champions Gate, FL: employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet 3 inches while working from a scaffold, in that they were not trained in the hazards associated with working from a scaffold system. Jacob Stucco LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.454(a) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1496184, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 04/12/2021, with respect to a workplace located at 600 E. Bay Street, Building A3, Lakeland, Florida 33801. |
|
|
|
345613939
|
0419700
|
2021-11-02
|
7507 PARK VILLAGE DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL, 32256
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2021-11-02
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET, L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-06-08
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1561401 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1561378 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G02 |
| Issuance Date |
2022-03-02 |
| Current Penalty |
2871.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
4786.0 |
| Final Order |
2022-03-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(2):The employer did not provide fall protection for employees erecting or dismantling supported scaffolds: a. In the balcony and scaffold decking at the front of the building #400, located at 7507 Park Village Drive, Jacksonville FL: On or about November 2, 2021, the employer exposed two employees to a 34 foot and higher fall hazards, in that fall protection was not utilized by employees unloading scaffold parts from a Telescopic Handler. |
|
|
|
344961842
|
0420600
|
2020-10-06
|
600 E. BAY STREET BUILDING A3, LAKELAND, FL, 33801
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2020-10-06
|
| Emphasis |
P: CTARGET, N: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2021-07-23
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1496167 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1496153 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G04 I |
| Issuance Date |
2021-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2021-04-08 |
| Current Penalty |
1755.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
2926.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. a) On or about October 6, 2020, at the west side of the residential apartment building, the corner end side of the second level of the supported scaffold used by employees to clean stucco on the wall had no guardrail system installed, exposing the employees to a 13.3 foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G04 XV |
| Issuance Date |
2021-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2021-04-08 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing used in place of a midrail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces is between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces is not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches (0.8 m) above the work platform or as a toprail when the crossing point of two braces is between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform. The endpoints at each upright were more than 48 inches (1.3 m) apart. a) On or about October 6, 2020, at the west side of the residential apartment building, the third level corner end side of the supported scaffold used by employees to clean stucco off the wall was missing guard rail components, exposing the employees to a 20 foot fall hazard. b) On or about October 6, 2020, at the west side of the residential apartment building, the middle column second level of the supported scaffold used by employees to clean stucco off the wall was missing guard rail components, exposing the employees to a 13.3 foot fall hazard. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2021-03-15 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2021-04-08 |
| Current Penalty |
1755.6 |
| Initial Penalty |
2926.0 |
| Final Order |
2021-04-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a) On or about October 6, 2020, at the west side of the residential apartment building, employees working on a supported scaffold while cleaning stucco on the exterior wall had not been trained on the hazards of the scaffold system. |
|
|
