Entity Name: | S AND P LLC |
Jurisdiction: | FLORIDA |
Filing Type: | Florida Limited Liability Co. |
Status: | Inactive |
Date Filed: | 19 Jun 2019 (6 years ago) |
Date of dissolution: | 21 Jan 2020 (5 years ago) |
Last Event: | VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION |
Event Date Filed: | 21 Jan 2020 (5 years ago) |
Document Number: | L19000161447 |
Address: | 141 EAST RIVERSIDE DR #21, JUPITER, FL, 33469, US |
Mail Address: | 141 EAST RIVERSIDE DR #21, JUPITER, FL, 33469, US |
ZIP code: | 33469 |
County: | Palm Beach |
Place of Formation: | FLORIDA |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
NEANDROSS LEIF | Agent | 141 EAST RIVERSIDE DR #21, JUPITER, FL, 33469 |
Name | Role | Address |
---|---|---|
NEANDROSS LEIF | Authorized Representative | 141 EAST RIVERSIDE DR #21, JUPITER, FL, 33469 |
CRONIN BRIAN | Authorized Representative | 576 SCRUBJAY LANE, JUPITER, FL, 33458 |
Event Type | Filed Date | Value | Description |
---|---|---|---|
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION | 2020-01-21 | No data | No data |
Title | Case Number | Docket Date | Status | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MICHAEL ZUPPARDO VS J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL | 2D2020-3578 | 2020-12-15 | Closed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | LAWRENCE KLEPETKO, ESQ. |
Name | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | DAVID O' QUINN, ESQ., LORI A. HEIM, ESQ. |
Name | S AND P LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DUNLAP AND MORAN, P. A. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DANIEL PREWETT |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | M.P.L., INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | HON. HUNTER CARROLL |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | HON. STEPHEN WALKER |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | SARASOTA CLERK |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2022-07-11 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate |
Docket Date | 2022-06-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
Description | ORD-DENYING REHEARING ~ Appellant's motions for rehearing, clarification, and written opinion are denied.Appellant’s motion for rehearing en banc proceeding, including attorney’sstatement for rehearing en banc, is denied. |
Docket Date | 2022-05-03 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE OF APPELLEE, DUNLAP & MORAN, P.A.. IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION, MOTION FOR EN BANC REHEARING PROCEEDING INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S STATEMENT FORREHEARING EN BANC AND REOUEST FOR WRITTEN OPINION |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2022-04-18 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR FOR CLARIFICATION(Fla.R.App.P. 9.330) AND APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EN BANC REHEARING PROCEEDING, INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S STATEMENT FOR REHEARING EN BANC [Fla.R.App.P. 9.331(d)] AND APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR WRITTEN OPINION-- [Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(a)] |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2022-04-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellee's motion for appellate attorneys' fees pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2020), based on a proposal for settlement is conditionally granted, subject to a determination of entitlement by the trial court on remand. If the trial court finds entitlement, then it shall also determine the reasonable amount of appellate attorney's fees. The request for costs is stricken. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(a). |
Docket Date | 2022-04-01 |
Type | Disposition by Opinion |
Subtype | Affirmed |
Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
Docket Date | 2021-11-03 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-19 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-09-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served by October 18, 2021. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-07 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-08-18 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Appendix |
Description | Appendix for Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-18 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-29 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Amended Appendix |
Description | Appendix for Amended Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-07-29 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Amended Initial Brief |
Description | Amended Appellant Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-07-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
Description | ORD-STRICKEN ~ Appellant’s initial brief is stricken for failing to comply with this court’s July 15, 2021, order. Appellant shall file an amended initial brief that certifies compliance with the applicable font and word count requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045 within ten days of the date of this order. Failure to timely serve the amended initial brief may result in this appeal being dismissed. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's initial brief fails to certify compliance with the applicable font and word count limit as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045. Appellant shall file a corrected brief within ten days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-14 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Appellant Brief on Merits ~ **STRICKEN** |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-07-06 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within five days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-01 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-06-11 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Serve Brief |
Description | Order for Immediate Filing of Brief ~ Appellant's initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-23 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Supplemental Record |
Description | Supplemental Records ~ REDACTED - 77 PAGES |
Docket Date | 2021-04-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | eot for brief, date certain ~ This court has received a motion for extension of time that is dependent on the action of the circuit or agency clerk or court reporter. To facilitate monitoring compliance with this order, the court is unwilling to grant an extension of time to a date that is subject to future action by third parties. As such, the Appellant's motion is granted to the extent that the initial brief shall be served within forty-five days. If the Appellant is unable to timely serve the brief due to the delay of this third party, the next appropriate step is the filing of a motion to compel in this court. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-22 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-04-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ~ Appellee Dunlap & Moran, P.A.'s motion to supplement the record is granted, and appellee shall make arrangements within three days with the clerk of the lower tribunal for the supplementation of the record with the items mentioned in the motion, with the supplemental record to be filed in this court within twenty-five days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-19 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Motion to Supplement |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Consolidate |
Description | ORD-GRANTING CONSOLIDATION ~ The above cases are consolidated for appeal for all purposes. All electronic filings in these consolidated cases shall be filed using the earliest case number. As a record has been transmitted in each appeal, the parties shall make clear to which record they are citing in the briefing. Appellant’s motions for extensions of time are granted to the extent that Appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty days of the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-03-16 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-03-16 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Related Case or Issue |
Description | Notice of Related Case ~ NOTICE OF FILING |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-02-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-02-09 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Record on Appeal |
Description | Received Records ~ WALKER - REDACTED - 4012 PAGES |
Docket Date | 2020-12-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | fee - civil; atty |
Docket Date | 2020-12-15 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
Docket Date | 2020-12-15 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
Docket Date | 2020-12-15 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ WITH ORDER |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 2nd District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County 07-CA-2336 |
Parties
Name | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | LAWRENCE KLEPETKO, ESQ. |
Name | S AND P LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DUNLAP AND MORAN, P. A. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | LORI A. HEIM, ESQ., DAVID O' QUINN, ESQ. |
Name | DANIEL PREWETT |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | M.P.L., INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | HON. STEPHEN WALKER |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | HON. HUNTER CARROLL |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | SARASOTA CLERK |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2022-04-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellee's motion for appellate attorneys' fees pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2020), based on a proposal for settlement is conditionally granted, subject to a determination of entitlement by the trial court on remand. If the trial court finds entitlement, then it shall also determine the reasonable amount of appellate attorney's fees. The request for costs is stricken. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(a). |
Docket Date | 2021-11-03 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served within 30 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-10-19 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-09-09 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served by October 18, 2021. |
Docket Date | 2021-09-07 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-08-18 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Answer Brief |
Description | Appellee Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-08-18 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-29 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Amended Initial Brief |
Description | Amended Appellant Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-07-29 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Amended Appendix |
Description | Appendix for Amended Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2022-07-11 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate |
Docket Date | 2022-06-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
Description | ORD-DENYING REHEARING ~ Appellant's motions for rehearing, clarification, and written opinion are denied.Appellant’s motion for rehearing en banc proceeding, including attorney’sstatement for rehearing en banc, is denied. |
Docket Date | 2022-05-03 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE OF APPELLEE, DUNLAP & MORAN, P.A.. IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION, MOTION FOR EN BANC REHEARING PROCEEDING INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S STATEMENT FORREHEARING EN BANC AND REOUEST FOR WRITTEN OPINION |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2022-04-18 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR FOR CLARIFICATION(Fla.R.App.P. 9.330) AND APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EN BANC REHEARING PROCEEDING, INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S STATEMENT FOR REHEARING EN BANC [Fla.R.App.P. 9.331(d)] AND APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR WRITTEN OPINION-- [Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(a)] |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2022-04-01 |
Type | Disposition by Opinion |
Subtype | Affirmed |
Description | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed |
Docket Date | 2021-07-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's initial brief fails to certify compliance with the applicable font and word count limit as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045. Appellant shall file a corrected brief within ten days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-14 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Appellant Brief on Merits ~ **STRICKEN** |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-07-06 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within five days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-01 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-06-11 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Serve Brief |
Description | Order for Immediate Filing of Brief ~ Appellant's initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-07-28 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order Striking Filing |
Description | ORD-STRICKEN ~ Appellant’s initial brief is stricken for failing to comply with this court’s July 15, 2021, order. Appellant shall file an amended initial brief that certifies compliance with the applicable font and word count requirements of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045 within ten days of the date of this order. Failure to timely serve the amended initial brief may result in this appeal being dismissed. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-23 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | eot for brief, date certain ~ This court has received a motion for extension of time that is dependent on the action of the circuit or agency clerk or court reporter. To facilitate monitoring compliance with this order, the court is unwilling to grant an extension of time to a date that is subject to future action by third parties. As such, the Appellant's motion is granted to the extent that the initial brief shall be served within forty-five days. If the Appellant is unable to timely serve the brief due to the delay of this third party, the next appropriate step is the filing of a motion to compel in this court. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-23 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Supplemental Record |
Description | Supplemental Records ~ REDACTED - 77 PAGES |
Docket Date | 2021-04-22 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ APPELLANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-04-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ~ Appellee Dunlap & Moran, P.A.'s motion to supplement the record is granted, and appellee shall make arrangements within three days with the clerk of the lower tribunal for the supplementation of the record with the items mentioned in the motion, with the supplemental record to be filed in this court within twenty-five days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-19 |
Type | Motions Relating to Records |
Subtype | Motion to Supplement Record |
Description | Motion to Supplement |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-04-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motions for extensions of time are granted to the extent that Appellant shall serve the initial brief within twenty days of the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-03-16 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Related Case or Issue |
Description | Notice of Related Case |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-03-16 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion To Consolidate |
Description | Motion To Consolidate |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-03-16 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-02-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-02-09 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Record on Appeal |
Description | Received Records ~ WALKER - REDACTED - 3798 PAGES |
Docket Date | 2021-01-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion To Dismiss |
Description | deny motion to dismiss; IB 20 days ~ Appellee's motion to dismiss is denied. The initial brief shall be served within 20 days or this appeal will be at risk of dismissal without further notice. |
Docket Date | 2021-01-20 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion To Dismiss |
Description | Motion To Dismiss ~ MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL FOR FAILURE TO FILE INITIAL BRIEF |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2020-12-15 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Travel Together |
Description | travel together ~ Appellant’s prior cases, 2D18-2302 and 2D18-2429, are closed. Appellant’s September 18, 2020, filing titled “amended notice of appeal” for review of the August 19, 2020, final judgment initiated case 2D20-2751. Appellant has submitted another amended notice of appeal, referring to case numbers 2D18-2302 and 2D18-2429. The December 14, 2020, amended notice of appeal seeks review of the November 19, 2020, final judgment on attorney’s fees and costs. This order was rendered after the notice of appeal that initiated case 2D20-2751 and, therefore, cannot be reviewed in that case. A separate proceeding is initiated.Appeal numbers 2D20-3578 and 2D20-2751 will travel together. Subsequent filings, including records and briefs, shall be filed in each case and shall contain the appropriate appeal number. The cases are not consolidated for any purpose at this time. Appellant is advised that he may bring this court’s attention to related cases by filing the notice referred to in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.380. Filings in the pending cases shall carry only the pending case numbers, not case numbers from closed cases, to avoid confusion in docketing and consideration. |
Docket Date | 2020-11-10 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Status Report |
Description | Status Report |
On Behalf Of | SARASOTA CLERK |
Docket Date | 2020-10-09 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Filing |
Description | Notice of Filing ~ APPELLEE'S DESIGNATION TO COURT REPORTER |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2020-10-05 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Filing |
Description | Notice of Filing ~ Amended Certificate of Service containing Statement Regarding Mailing Addresses as required by the Court's recent order pertaining to such addresses |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-10-05 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 ~ AMENDED |
Docket Date | 2020-09-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Certificate of Service |
Description | c of s; mailing addresses |
Docket Date | 2020-09-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Certificate of Service |
Description | OSC/no cert. of service |
Docket Date | 2020-09-21 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed ~ WITH ORDER |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
Classification | Original Proceedings - Circuit Civil - Certiorari |
Court | 2nd District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County 07-CA-2336 |
Parties
Name | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | LAWRENCE KLEPETKO, ESQ. |
Name | DANIEL PREWETT |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | S AND P LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | LORI A. HEIM, ESQ. |
Name | M.P.L., INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DUNLAP AND MORAN, P. A. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | SARASOTA CLERK |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2018-09-14 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Case Closed |
Description | Case Closed |
Docket Date | 2018-08-27 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
Description | ORD-DENYING REHEARING ~ Upon consideration of Petitioner's July 20, 2018, response to this court's July 18, 2018, order to show cause, the June 11, 2018, notice of appeal was untimely filed for review of the April 23, 2018, Order Denying Plaintiff Michael Zuppardo's Motion to Amend the Pleadings to Add a Claim for Punitive Damages Against Defendant Dunlap & Moran, P.A. Petitioner's motion for reinstatement of "appeal" and his motion for consolidation with case number 2D18-2302 are denied. |
Docket Date | 2018-08-21 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion For Reinstatement |
Description | Motion For Reinstatement |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-08-16 |
Type | Disposition by Order |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | dismiss/no fee/order of insolvency ~ This proceeding is dismissed because of the appellant's failure to satisfy this court's June 21, 2018, fee order. |
Docket Date | 2018-08-16 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Order by Judge ~ LaRose, C.J., and Black and Badalamenti |
Docket Date | 2018-07-30 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ Response To Court's Show-Cause Order |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-07-18 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Show Cause |
Description | ORD-TO SHOW CAUSE ~ Within ten days from the date of this order, petitioner shall show cause why this proceeding should not be dismissed as untimely filed. See Richardson v. Watson, 611 So. 2d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). |
Docket Date | 2018-07-13 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
Description | Amended Notice of Appeal |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-07-10 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Clarification |
Description | Deny Clarification-78a ~ Petitioner's motion for clarification is denied with directions that counsel consult Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d), requiring a certificate of service that specifies the party each attorney represents and that complies with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f) (stating that prima facie service is shown by a certificate of service that includes the mailing address as well as the address used for service). |
Docket Date | 2018-07-09 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion For Clarification |
Description | Motion For Clarification |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-07-03 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2018-06-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ The notice of appeal seeks review of two orders. Review of the order denying Plaintiff's motion to add a claim for punitive damages shall proceed in certiorari in case no. 18-2429. Petitioner shall file a petition and appendix within twenty days from the date of this order. Review of the order denying Plaintiff's motion to add additional parties shall proceed in case no. 18-2302 as an appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). Challenges to these case classifications may be made by motion within ten days. |
Docket Date | 2018-06-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Filing Fee |
Description | fee - writ; atty |
Docket Date | 2018-06-21 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
Docket Date | 2018-06-12 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | HL:Fee Owed |
Docket Date | 2018-06-12 |
Type | Petition |
Subtype | Petition |
Description | Petition Filed |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Classification | NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other |
Court | 2nd District Court of Appeal |
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, Sarasota County 07-CA-2336 |
Parties
Name | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Role | Appellant |
Status | Active |
Representations | LAWRENCE KLEPETKO, ESQ. |
Name | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Representations | LORI A. HEIM, ESQ. |
Name | S AND P LLC |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | M.P.L., INC. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DANIEL PREWETT |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | DUNLAP AND MORGAN, P. A. |
Role | Appellee |
Status | Active |
Name | HON. HUNTER CARROLL |
Role | Judge/Judicial Officer |
Status | Active |
Name | SARASOTA CLERK |
Role | Lower Tribunal Clerk |
Status | Active |
Docket Entries
Docket Date | 2021-03-02 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Deny EOT (General)-74d ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time for filing post-judgment motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc is denied. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-24 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED ON FEBRUARY 23, 2021 |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-02-23 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ for filing the Appellant's post-judgment motions |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2021-02-05 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Deny Miscellaneous Motion-79a ~ The motion filed on behalf of appellant to recall appellate mandate is denied. |
Docket Date | 2021-01-15 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE, DUNLAP & MORAN, P.A.'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO RECALL APPELLATE MANDATE |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2021-01-12 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Miscellaneous Motion |
Description | Miscellaneous Motion ~ Filed On Behalf of Appellant To Recall Appellate Mandate |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-09-18 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice ~ NOTICE OF FILING |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-09-15 |
Type | Mandate |
Subtype | Mandate |
Description | Mandate |
Docket Date | 2020-08-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Rehearing |
Description | ORD-DENYING REHEARING |
Docket Date | 2020-06-24 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION AND FOR REHEARING EN BANC FILED ON JUNE 23, 2020 |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2020-06-23 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion for Rehearing |
Description | Motion for Rehearing / Rehearing En Banc ~ APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR FOR CLARIFICATION ANDAPPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EN BANC REHEARING PROCEEDING,INCLUDING ATTORNEY'S STATEMENT FOR REHEARING EN BANC INCLUDING REQUEST FOR WRITTEN OPINION |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-06-23 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice ~ notice of Plaintiff's hospitalization filed in the trial court on or about June 19, 2020.Such hospitalization ended just before this filing on June 23, 2020 |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-06-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | ORD-SUA SPONTE ~ Appellant filed a second motion for an extension of time pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a) to file a motion for rehearing, for rehearing en banc, and for certification, on June 4, 2020. This court denied Appellant's June 4, 2020, motion on June 11, 2020, because the motion was insufficient and ordered the Appellant to file his motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and for certification within three business days. Appellant then filed an amended motion or extension of time on June 16, 2020. Appellee filed a response on June 17, 2020, objecting to the amended motion. It is ordered that Appellant file his motion for rehearing, for rehearing en banc, and for certification no later than June 22, 2020. No additional extensions of time will be granted. |
Docket Date | 2020-06-17 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S AMENDED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED ON JUNE 16, 2020 |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2020-06-16 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ AMENDED UNOPPOSED APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-06-11 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Deny EOT (General)-74d ~ Appellant's unopposed motion for an extension of time pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a) does not state sufficient grounds for an additional five day-extension and therefore is denied. Appellant was granted an extension of fifteen days to file his motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and for certification on May 20, 2020. Appellant shall file the motion for rehearing, for rehearing en banc, and for certification within three business days of this order. |
Docket Date | 2020-06-04 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ motion for rehearing; motion for rehearing en banc; and motion for certification |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-05-20 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Grant EOT (general)-74c ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing, motion for rehearing en banc and motion for certification is granted for 15 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2020-05-18 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | Motion for Extension of Time ~ motion for rehearing; motion for rehearing en banc; and motion for certification |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2020-05-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's motion to tax costs and award attorney's fees pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400 is hereby denied. Appellees did not file a response to the motion. |
Docket Date | 2020-05-01 |
Type | Disposition |
Subtype | Dismissed |
Description | Dismissed - Per Curiam Opinion |
Docket Date | 2020-02-19 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Oral Argument Date Set |
Description | Oral Argument Date Set ~ Tampa |
Docket Date | 2019-12-04 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
Description | Oral Argument Notice ~ This case is provisionally set for oral argument on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2020, at 11:00 A.M., before: Judge Morris Silberman, Judge Matthew C. Lucas, Judge Andrea T. Smith. Oral argument will occur at the Second District Court of Appeal, Tampa Branch Headquarters, in the courtroom of the Stetson University College Of Law, Tampa Campus, First Floor, 1700 North Tampa Street, Tampa, Florida. The court calendars can be viewed on this court’s website at www.2dca.org. Counsel or parties are requested to make their presence known to the receptionist by fifteen minutes prior to the time listed above.The panel is subject to change without notice. Should the assigned panel of judges decide that the court will not benefit from oral argument in this proceeding, the attorneys or parties will be notified by order no less than two weeks before the scheduled date.Please review the notice regarding oral argument in the Second District Court of Appeal. A copy has been furnished with this order and may also be found on this court’s website. |
Docket Date | 2019-10-04 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall beserved within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2019-10-01 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2019-09-11 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2019-09-10 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ *reply brief* |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2019-08-14 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the reply brief shall be served by September 10, 2019. |
Docket Date | 2019-08-12 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2019-07-22 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Answer Brief |
Description | Appellee Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2019-07-03 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee Dunlap & Moran, P.A.'s motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shall be served by July 22, 2019. |
Docket Date | 2019-07-01 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2019-06-12 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee Dunlap & Moran, P.A.'s motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shall be served by July 1, 2019. |
Docket Date | 2019-06-10 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2019-05-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee Dunlap & Moran, P.A.'s motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shall be served by June 10, 2019. |
Docket Date | 2019-05-20 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2019-05-01 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR ANSWER BRIEF ~ Appellee Dunlap & Moran P.A.'s motion for extension of time is granted, and the answer brief shall be served by May 21, 2019. |
Docket Date | 2019-04-30 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2019-04-29 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2019-04-12 |
Type | Motions Relating to Oral Argument |
Subtype | Motion/Request for Oral Argument |
Description | Request for Oral Argument |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2019-04-12 |
Type | Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs |
Subtype | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
Description | Motion For Attorney's Fees |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2019-04-11 |
Type | Brief |
Subtype | Initial Brief |
Description | Initial Appellant Brief on Merits |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2019-03-26 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Record on Appeal |
Description | Received Records ~ CARROLL - 3694 PAGES |
Docket Date | 2019-03-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | grant eot for IB - unlikely ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be serve within 20 days from the date of this order. However, further motions for extension of time are unlikely to receive favorable consideration. |
Docket Date | 2019-03-14 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice |
Description | Notice ~ of Non-Payment for Appellate Record |
On Behalf Of | SARASOTA CLERK |
Docket Date | 2019-03-04 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2019-02-19 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2019-01-30 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-12-31 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time |
Description | eot for brief, date certain ~ This court has received a motion for extension of time that is dependent on the action of the circuit or agency clerk or court reporter. To facilitate monitoring compliance with this order, the court is unwilling to grant an extension of time to a date that is subject to future action by third parties. As such, the appellant's motion is granted to the extent that the initial brief shall be served within 30 days. If the appellant is unable to timely serve the brief due to the delay of this third party, the next appropriate step is the filing of a motion to compel in this court. |
Docket Date | 2018-12-27 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-12-12 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 15 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2018-12-11 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-11-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2018-11-19 |
Type | Motions Extensions |
Subtype | Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief |
Description | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-10-29 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order to Serve Brief |
Description | Order for Immediate Filing of Brief ~ Appellant's initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order. |
Docket Date | 2018-08-21 |
Type | Motions Other |
Subtype | Motion To Consolidate |
Description | Motion To Consolidate ~ See order entered in case number 18-2429 |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-08-21 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion For Reinstatement |
Description | Motion For Reinstatement ~ Reinstatement applied to case number 18-2429 |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-07-31 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ Response To Court's Show-Cause Order |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-07-13 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Amended Notice of Appeal |
Description | Amended Notice of Appeal |
Docket Date | 2018-07-11 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order on Motion For Clarification |
Description | Deny Clarification-78a ~ Petitioner's motion for clarification is denied with directions that counsel consult Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(d), requiring a certificate of service that specifies the party each attorney represents and that complies with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(f) (stating that prima facie service is shown by a certificate of service that includes the mailing address as well as the address used for service). |
Docket Date | 2018-07-09 |
Type | Post-Disposition Motions |
Subtype | Motion For Clarification |
Description | Motion For Clarification |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-07-03 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appearance |
Description | Notice of Appearance |
On Behalf Of | J. H. INVESTMENTS, INC. |
Docket Date | 2018-07-03 |
Type | Record |
Subtype | Appendix to Response |
Description | APPENDICES /ATTACHMENTS TO RESPONSE ~ Attachments to Appellant's Response to Court's Order dated June 22, 2018 |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-07-02 |
Type | Response |
Subtype | Response |
Description | RESPONSE ~ Appellant's Response to Court's Order dated June 22, 2018 |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Docket Date | 2018-06-22 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Order |
Description | Miscellaneous Order ~ The notice of appeal seeks review of two orders. Review of the order denying Plaintiff's motion to add a claim for punitive damages shall proceed in certiorari in case no. 18-2429. Petitioner shall file a petition and appendix within twenty days from the date of this order. Review of the order denying Plaintiff's motion to add additional parties shall proceed in case no. 18-2302 as an appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). Challenges to these case classifications may be made by motion within ten days. |
Docket Date | 2018-06-21 |
Type | Order |
Subtype | Certificate of Service |
Description | OSC/no cert. of service |
Docket Date | 2018-06-21 |
Type | Letter |
Subtype | Acknowledgment Letter |
Description | Acknowledgment Letter 1 |
Docket Date | 2018-06-12 |
Type | Misc. Events |
Subtype | Fee Status |
Description | A3:Paid In Full - $300 |
Docket Date | 2018-06-12 |
Type | Notice |
Subtype | Notice of Appeal |
Description | Notice of Appeal Filed |
On Behalf Of | MICHAEL ZUPPARDO |
Name | Date |
---|---|
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION | 2020-01-21 |
Florida Limited Liability | 2019-06-19 |
Date of last update: 02 Feb 2025
Sources: Florida Department of State