Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
Court |
2nd District Court of Appeal
|
Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County
21-1940-CI
|
Parties
Name |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
Role |
Appellant
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
STEVEN SCOTT STEPHENS, ESQ., SETH V. ALHADEFF, ESQ., DAVID L. LUCK, ESQ.
|
|
Name |
AIR ISAAC, LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
Representations |
JAKE C. BLANCHARD, ESQ., JOHN A. ANTHONY, ESQ.
|
|
Name |
BUILDERS CORPORATION
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
RK324, LLC
|
Role |
Appellee
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
HON. GEORGE JIROTKA
|
Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Name |
PINELLAS CLERK
|
Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
Docket Date |
2023-01-17
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2023-01-17
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-30
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Rehearing
|
Description |
ORD-DENYING REHEARING ~ Appellee's motion for rehearing and certification is denied.I
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-19
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Rehearing
|
Description |
Motion For Rehearing ~ A&P'S MOTION FOR (A) REHEARING OF OPINION, AND (B) CERTIFICATION OFOPINION TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-12-02
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Reversed
|
Description |
Reversed - Authored Opinion ~ and remanded with instructions.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-22
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Continuation of Oral Argument
|
Description |
ORD-GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF OA ~ Appellant’s motion filed June 9, 2022, for continuance of oral argument is granted. Oral argument scheduled for August 5, 2022, is canceled and will be rescheduled for a later date.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-09
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion For Continuation of Oral Argument
|
Description |
Motion For Continuation of Oral Argument ~ DEFENDANT-APPELLANT VAN SANT LAW, LLC'S AGREED MOTION TO CONTINUE/RESCHEDULEORAL ARGUMENT
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-17
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TOAPPELLANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STRIKE
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-16
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ DEFENDANT-APPELLANT VAN SANT LAW, LLC'S OPPOSITION TO APPELLEE MR. ANTHONY'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-02
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Strike
|
Description |
Motion To Strike ~ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF REPLY BRIEF
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Reply Brief
|
Description |
Appellant Reply Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's motion for judicial notice is deferred to the merits panel. Appellee's motion to strike the motion for judicial notice is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-28
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ DEFENDANT-APPELLANT VAN SANT LAW, LLC'S OPPOSITION TO APPELLEE ANTHONY & PARTNERS, LLC'S INCORPORATED MOTION TO STRIKE VAN SANT LAW'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-24
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
Description |
Appellee Answer Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-14
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND MOTION TO STRIKE
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Amended OA Request Permitted ~ A request for oral argument has been filed in this case. Within five days from the date of this order, any party may file a request that the argument be conducted by video. The manner of oral argument will be decided in the court's discretion. A video request must state the reason in support, and it must indicate that the requesting party has consulted opposing counsel and is authorized to represent that opposing counsel either has no objection or will file an objection. A party objecting to a request to conduct oral argument by video must file a response within five days after service of the request.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time
|
Description |
Stipulation for Extension of Time ~ 10- AB DUE 03/24/22
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-10
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion/Request for Judicial Notice
|
Description |
Motion for Judicial Notice ~ MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-10
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Amended Initial Brief
|
Description |
Amended Appellant Initial Brief
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-27
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ JIROTKA - REDACTED - 352 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-13
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-06
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
fee - civil; atty
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-02
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ W/ORDER APPEALED
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-12-02
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-05-25
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion To Strike
|
Description |
Deny Motion to Strike-13a ~ Appellee’s motion to strike portions of reply brief is denied. Appellee’s motion forleave to reply to Appellant’s opposition to the motion to strike is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-13
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Oral Argument Date Set
|
Description |
Oral Argument Date Set ~ Tampa
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-12
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Supplemental Authority
|
Description |
Notice of Supplemental Authority ~ DEFENDANT-APPELLANT VAN SANT LAW, LLC'SNOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-09-08
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Status Report
|
Description |
Status Report ~ DEFENDANT-APPELLANT VAN SANT LAW, LLC'S NOTICE OF FILING REGARDING WESLEY ISAAC EDWARDS' PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY
|
On Behalf Of |
VAN SANT LAW, LLC
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Oral Argument Notice ~ This case is provisionally set for oral argument on TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2022, at 11:00 A.M., before: Judge Robert J. Morris, Jr., Judge Susan H. Rothstein-Youakim, Judge John K. Stargel. Oral argument will occur at the Second District Court of Appeal, Tampa Branch Headquarters, in the courtroom of the Stetson University College Of Law, Tampa Campus, First Floor, 1700 North Tampa Street, Tampa, Florida. The court calendars can be viewed on this court’s website at www.2dca.org. Counsel or parties are requested to make their presence known to the receptionist by fifteen minutes prior to the time listed above.The panel is subject to change without notice. Should the assigned panel of judges decide that the court will not benefit from oral argument in this proceeding, the attorneys or parties will be notified by order no less than two weeks before the scheduled date. If this is a criminal proceeding where a victim, as defined in article I, section 16(e), Florida Constitution, has invoked their right to notice under article I, section 16(b)(6), the State is directed to provide the victim with notice of this oral argument and of any changes to the scheduled date.Please review the notice regarding oral argument in the Second District Court of Appeal. A copy has been furnished with this order and may also be found on this court’s website.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-06-07
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
Description |
Oral Argument Notice for Out of Town Session ~ This case is provisionally set for oral argument on FRIDAY, AUGUST 05, 2022, at 9:30 A.M., before: Judge Edward C. LaRose, Judge John K. Stargel, Judge Suzanne Labrit. Oral argument will occur in Courtroom 1A of the WEST PASCO JUDICIAL CENTER, 7530 LITTLE ROAD, NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA. The court calendars can be viewed on this court’s website at www.2dca.org. Counsel or parties are requested to make their presence known to the receptionist by fifteen minutes prior to the time listed above.The panel is subject to change without notice. Should the assigned panel of judges decide that the court will not benefit from oral argument in this proceeding, the attorneys or parties will be notified by order no less than two weeks before the scheduled date. If this is a criminal proceeding where a victim, as defined in article I, section 16(e), Florida Constitution, has invoked their right to notice under article I, section 16(b)(6), the State is directed to provide the victim with notice of this oral argument and of any changes to the scheduled date.Please review the notice regarding oral argument in the Second District Court of Appeal. A copy has been furnished with this order and may also be found on this court’s website.
|
|
|