|
347626426
|
0420600
|
2024-07-17
|
2527 RIVERBLUFF PKWY, SARASOTA, FL, 34231
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2024-07-17
|
| Emphasis |
N: FALL
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1762581 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
2186513 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2024-07-25 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2024-08-20 |
| Current Penalty |
5071.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5071.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-08-20 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: a. On or about Month July 17, 2024, at 2527 Riverbluff Pkwy, Sarasota, FL 34231, employees were engaged in roofing work; wherein the employees were removing and then reinstalling roofing materials on a low-slope roof, less than 50 feet in width, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, during which time the employer had not prepared a written certification of training for each employee; therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard. |
|
|
|
344308044
|
0419700
|
2019-09-12
|
1120 N. 15TH ST, MEXICO BEACH, FL, 32456
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2019-09-12
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-06-10
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-11-18 |
| Current Penalty |
10608.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
10608.0 |
| Final Order |
2020-01-07 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: a. On or about September 12, 2019, on the south slope of the roof, three roofing employees installing components for a sheet metal roof were exposed to a 26 feet fall hazard in that they were not protected by a fall protection system. NAR Roofing, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1393407, Serious citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on August 26, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 300 Ryders Cup Circle, Saint Augustine, florida. |
|
|
|
343934071
|
0419700
|
2019-04-11
|
300 RYDERS CUP CIRCLE, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL, 32092
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2019-05-30
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-07-28
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1393399 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-06-26 |
| Current Penalty |
3978.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3978.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-08-26 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles. a) On or about April 9, 2019 to April 11, 2019: Two employees were observed operating pneumatic nail gun on building 115 while installing roof shingles and were not using eye protection, exposing employees to eye injuries. b) On or about April 9, 2019: Two employees were observed operating pneumatic nail gun on building 230 while installing roof shingles and were not using eye protection, exposing employees to eye injuries. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2019-06-26 |
| Current Penalty |
9282.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
9282.0 |
| Final Order |
2019-08-26 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
30 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about April 9, 2019 to April 11, 2019: Employees were observed performing roofing activities on building 115 and were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection; exposing employees to 9 to 28-feet fall hazard. b) On or about April 9, 2019 to April 11, 2019: Employees were observed performing roofing activities on building 230 and were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection; exposing employees to 9 to 28-feet fall hazard. c) On or about April 9, 2019 to April 11, 2019: Employees were observed performing roofing activities on building 300 and were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection; exposing employees to 9 to 28-feet fall hazard. |
|
|
