Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
Type |
Mandate
|
Subtype |
Mandate
|
Description |
Mandate
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-26
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
West Publishing
|
Description |
West Publishing
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-25
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
Description |
Review Sent to Supreme Court
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-24
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Notice to Invok. Disc. Jur. FSC
|
Description |
NOTICE OF DISCRETN. JURISDICTN
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-07
|
Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
Subtype |
Affirmed
|
Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-07-14
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice
|
Description |
Notice ~ NOTICE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CLERK OF COURT
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-26
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Deny Clarification-78a ~ Appellant's amended motion for clarification is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-04-25
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Motion For Clarification ~ AMENDED
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-24
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Deny Clarification-78a ~ Appellant's motion for clarification is denied.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-21
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Motion For Clarification
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-03-10
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
Description |
brief or proceed ~ Appellee shall serve the answer brief within twenty days or this appeal will proceed without it.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-02-14
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
Description |
Order for Immediate Filing of Brief ~ Appellee's answer brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-01-10
|
Type |
Brief
|
Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
Description |
Initial Appellant Brief on Merits
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-05
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Grant Clarification-77 ~ Appellant's motion for clarification is granted to the extent that his motion to show cause was treated as a response to this court's order to show cause. The order to show cause was discharged, and this case is pending. Appellant's initial brief is due according to the September 28, 2021, order, a copy of which is enclosed.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-30
|
Type |
Post-Disposition Motions
|
Subtype |
Motion For Clarification
|
Description |
Motion For Clarification
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-09-28
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order to Serve Brief
|
Description |
Order for Immediate Filing of Brief ~ Appellant's initial brief shall be served within 20 days from the date of this order.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-18
|
Type |
Record
|
Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
Description |
Received Records ~ WALKER - REDACTED - 369 PAGES
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-16
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order Discharging Show Cause Order
|
Description |
ORD-DISCHARGING SHOW CAUSE ~ This court's July 6, 2021, order to show cause is hereby discharged.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-16
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
Description |
Notice of Filing ~ FINAL ORDER W/ENVELOPE
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-05
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Trial Court Document ~ MOTION TO PROCEED IN INDIGENT STATUS
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-03
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ DUPLICATE
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-02
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE ~ MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-08-02
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order
|
Description |
Miscellaneous Order ~ Appellant's response titled Motion to Show Cause refers to a July 19, 2021, hearing in response to this court's July 6, 2021, order to show cause. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, Appellant shall submit a copy of the order entered after that hearing. The order to show cause remains pending.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-23
|
Type |
Motions Other
|
Subtype |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
Description |
Motion To Appear Forma Pauperis
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-23
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
fee affidavit in appeals/wrong court ~ Appellant's submission of motion to proceed in indigent status does not fulfill the requirements of this court's fee order of June 8, 2021. If appellant qualifies for a filing fee waiver, he/she must submit an order or certificate of insolvency from the lower tribunal. The motion for a determination of insolvency must be submitted to the lower tribunal, and the resulting order or certificate then forwarded to this court. The filing fee or order/certificate of indigency from the lower tribunal shall be remitted within twenty days.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-10-20
|
Type |
Motions Extensions
|
Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-07-06
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Show Cause Jurisdiction
|
Description |
OSC/Better Gov't Ass'n [summary judgment) ~ **DISCHARGED-SEE 8/16/21 ORDER**Appellant shall show cause within twenty days why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Wahl v. Taylor, 926 So. 2d 488, 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) ("[A]n order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order."); Better Gov't Ass'n of Sarasota Cty. v. State, 802 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Jurisdiction is relinquished to the extent necessary to allow the trial court to enter an appealable, final order. Should appellant provide this court with such an appealable, final order within twenty days, this premature appeal will be mature and will proceed to consideration. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(l) (stating that if a notice of appeal is prematurely filed before rendition of a final order, "the lower tribunal retains jurisdiction to render a final order"). If appellant fails to present an appealable order within that time frame, or persuade this court that the existing order is appealable, this appeal will be subject to dismissal without further notice.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-06-29
|
Type |
Response
|
Subtype |
Response
|
Description |
RESPONSE
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-06-08
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
Description |
fee - civil; pro se ~ This appeal has been filed without a filing fee required by section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes.Appellant shall forward the required $300.00 filing fee or, if applicable, a certificate or order from the lower tribunal finding appellant insolvent pursuant to section 57.081 or 57.085, Florida Statutes, as applicable, within forty days from the date of this order.If this court does not receive either of the above within the prescribed time, this appeal may be subject to dismissal without further notice.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-06-08
|
Type |
Letter
|
Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
Description |
Acknowledgment Letter 1
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-06-07
|
Type |
Notice
|
Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
On Behalf Of |
ALEX H. GOMEZ
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-06-07
|
Type |
Misc. Events
|
Subtype |
Fee Status
|
Description |
WV:Waived
|
|
Docket Date |
2022-10-28
|
Type |
Supreme Court
|
Subtype |
Supreme Court Miscellaneous
|
Description |
Supreme Court Disposition ~ This case is hereby dismissed. This Court lacks jurisdiction toreview an unelaborated decision from a district court of appeal thatis issued without opinion or explanation or that merely cites to anauthority that is not a case pending review in, or reversed orquashed by, this Court. See Wheeler v. State, 296 So. 3d 895 (Fla.2020); Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 2014); Jackson v. State,926 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 2006); Gandy v. State, 846 So. 2d 1141 (Fla.2003); Stallworth v. Moore, 827 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 2002); Harrison v.Hyster Co., 515 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 1987); Dodi Publ’g Co. v. EditorialAm. S.A., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980); Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d1356 (Fla. 1980).No motion for rehearing or reinstatement will be entertainedby the Court.
|
|
Docket Date |
2021-11-08
|
Type |
Order
|
Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
Description |
ORDER GRANTING EOT FOR INITIAL BRIEF ~ Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted, and the initial brief shall be served within 60 days from the date of this order.
|
|