| Docket Date |
2023-05-30
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-Lack of Prosecution ~ ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-30
|
| Type |
Disposition
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-05-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Denying EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants' April 28, 2023 motion for extension of time to file the initial brief is denied. Appellants shall file the initial brief within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-28
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-11
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Initial Brief to be Served ~ Upon consideration of appellees' April 4, 2023 response, it is ORDERED that appellants' April 3, 2023 motion to stay is treated as a motion for extension of time to file initial brief, and is granted. Appellants shall serve the initial brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case will be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellants are advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the initial brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time. Further,ORDERED that appellees' request to dismiss the appeal provided within the response is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-07
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply
|
| Description |
Reply
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-04
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Enza Main, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-03
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Denying EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants’ March 9, 2023 reply to the response is stricken as unauthorized. Fla. R. App. P. 9.300(a). Further,Upon consideration of appellees’ March 8, 2023 response, it is ORDERED that appellants’ March 7, 2023 motion for extension of time to file initial brief is denied. This appeal was initiated in July 2022 and appellants previously received 92 days total in extensions. Appellants shall file the initial brief within twenty (20) days from the date of this order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this appeal for lack of prosecution without further notice.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-09
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Reply to Response
|
| Description |
Reply to Response
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-08
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Enza Main, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Deny Motion to Supplement Record ~ Upon consideration of appellees' February 27, 2023 response, it is ORDERED that appellants' February 24, 2023 motion to file supplemental record is denied. See Thornber v. City of Fort Walton Beach, 534 So. 2d 754, 755–56 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The proposed supplemental material filed on March 2, 2023, is stricken from the docket.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-02
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ ***STRICKEN FROM THE DOCKET*** PROPOSED
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-27
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Enza Main, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Enza Main, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ Upon consideration of appellees' February 6, 2023 response, it is ORDERED that appellants' February 1, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above–styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Further, ORDERED that appellees' request to strike certain language and prohibit appellants' counsel from making certain statements provided within the response is denied. The parties are now warned not to engage in personal attacks and to confine their arguments to facts supported by the record.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-06
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Enza Main, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-01
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-30
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants' January 26, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within two (2) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-26
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-19
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants’ January 11, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within one (1) week from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-11
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants’ December 27, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within one (1) week from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-27
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records ~ ***MOTION GRANTED***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-27
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-27
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record ~ Upon consideration of appellees' November 30, 2022 response, it is ORDERED that appellants' November 18, 2022 motion to supplement and correct the record is granted in part to the extent the motion requests supplementation. The record is supplemented to include the hearing transcripts. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order. Further, ORDERED that appellants' motion to supplement and correct the record is denied in part to the extent the motion seeks to correct the record.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-30
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Enza Main, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-11-18
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-20
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellants' September 12, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellants shall serve the initial brief within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-12
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal Confidential
|
| Description |
Confidential Records ~ 14 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-12
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-08
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellants' September 7, 2022 motion for extension of time is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief ~ ***STRICKEN***
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-18
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-14
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-13
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Bugra Toplusoy
|
|
