| Docket Date |
2023-09-22
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order
|
| Description |
Pursuant to the joint stipulation for dismissal filed herein, this appeal is dismissed.
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-09-20
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Notice Voluntary Dismissal
|
| Description |
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-16
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Stay
|
| Description |
Grant Stay ~ ORDERED that appellee's August 14, 2023 motion to stay is granted, and the above-styled appeal is stayed for thirty-five (35) days from the date of this order to allow the parties to effectuate the settlement agreement.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-15
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice
|
| Description |
Notice ~ OF APPELLANT'S NON-OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR STAY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Meghan Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-14
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ AND NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Meghan Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-08-02
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
ORD-Answer Brief to be Served ~ ORDERED that appellee's July 24, 2023 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within ten (10) days from the current due date. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein will foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal, or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. Appellee is advised that no further extensions will be granted absent a detailed explanation for why the answer brief has not yet been filed and a showing of extraordinary circumstances where, if a further extension is not granted, irreparable and material harm will result to the litigant. Attorney workload does not constitute extraordinary circumstances which justifies a further extension of time.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-07-24
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Meghan Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 30 DAYS TO 7/29/23
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-06-21
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Meghan Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-10
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Agreed Extension of Time - Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Notice of Agreed Extension - Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Meghan Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-04-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Agreed Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Recognizing Agreed Extension of Time ~ 60 DAYS TO 06/22/2023
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-31
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
ORD-Deny Relinquishment of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant's March 28, 2023 response, appellee's March 23, 2023 motion to relinquish jurisdiction is denied. McNulty v. BankUnited, 140 So. 3d 1041 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-23
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
Motion To Relinquish Jurisdiction
|
| On Behalf Of |
Meghan Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-14
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief has not been filed with this court as of this date. Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief is filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-14
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-03-14
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Records
|
| Subtype |
Motion to Supplement Record
|
| Description |
Motion To File Supplemental Record
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Supplemental Record
|
| Description |
Supplemental Records
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion to Supplement Record & EOT/Toll Briefing
|
| Description |
ORD-Allowing Attachment to Record ~ ORDERED that appellant's February 24, 2023 motion to supplement the record is granted, and the record is supplemented to include the trial transcripts referenced in the motion. Said supplemental record is deemed filed as of the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-16
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Meghan Smith
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-02-15
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Received Records ~ 7856 PAGES
|
| On Behalf Of |
Clerk - Palm Beach
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-06
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Abeyance Order
|
| Description |
Order Holding Case in Abeyance Per R. 9.020(h)(2)(C) ~ This court notes that a motion tolling rendition is pending in the trial court. ORDERED that the above-styled case is held in abeyance until the trial court disposes of the motion and appellant files a copy of the order in this court. On that date, this case shall proceed, and the briefing schedule shall run from that date. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h)(2)(C). If the trial court has not entered an order disposing of the motion within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file a status report with this court as to the progress being made towards disposition of the motion.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2023-01-06
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Filing
|
| Description |
Notice of Filing ~ ORDER DISPOSING OF MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL IN TRIAL COURT
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Case Filing Fee Paid through Portal
|
| Description |
Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2021), is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
FP:Fee Paid Through Portal
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-12-22
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Central Dynamics Corporation
|
|
