| Docket Date |
2022-09-09
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-09-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-18
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-08-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Order Granting Attorney Fees-Prevailing ~ ORDERED that appellee’s May 3, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that appellee is the prevailing party and, if so, setting the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case. If a motion for rehearing is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including but not limited to preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-10
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's June 7, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within fifteen (15) days from the date of this order. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-07
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-26
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Appellant's Reply Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 25, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellant shall serve the reply brief within fifteen (15) days from the current due date. In addition, if the reply brief is served after the time provided for in this order, it may be stricken.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-25
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-25
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time
|
| Description |
Order denying EOT w/out prejudice 9.300(a) ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 25, 2022 motion for extension of time is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300(a). See also this court's Notice to Attorneys and to Parties Representing Themselves, Paragraphs 1 and 2.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant's May 23, 2022 motion is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-23
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-20
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Granted in Part/Denied in Part
|
| Description |
ORD-Grant in Part/Deny in Part ~ ORDERED that appellee's April 29, 2022 motion to file appendix in separate filings and to include condensed transcripts is granted to the extent the motion seeks leave to include in the appendix a condensed transcript filed in support of a summary judgment motion at the trial court level. However, the motion is denied to the extent it seeks leave to file the appendix in multiple parts. The aggregate size limit for filing to the Appellate Courts through the Statewide Portal is 200 megabytes for one submission. Therefore, within three (3) days from the date of this order, appellee shall file an amended appendix which contains all documents in a single PDF file. If appellee encounters difficulties with filing the amended appendix, counsel shall contact this court's Clerk's Office for assistance, before filing a motion with the court.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-05
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ (PROPOSED) PART TWO
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-03
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ **STRICKEN** (PROPOSED) PART TWO
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-03
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-03
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Attorney Fees/Costs
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| Description |
Motion For Attorney's Fees
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-29
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO FILE APPENDIX TO APPELLEE'S ANSWER BRIEF IN SEPARATE FILINGS, AND INCLUDE CONDENSED TRANSCRIPTS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-07
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's April 6, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted in part, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within fifteen (15) days from the current due date. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-06
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-22
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief ~ PART ONE
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-17
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief ~ ORDERED that appellee's February 16, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before April 18, 2022. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-16
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ **GRANTED, SEE 02/09/2022 ORDER** MOTION TO FILE APPENDIX TO APPELLANT'S INITIAL BRIEF IN SEPARATE FILINGS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
ORD-Denying Aplee's Motion to Dismiss ~ ORDERED that appellee’s January 18, 2022 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice to appellee raising the arguments in the answer brief. Further, ORDERED that appellee’s January 18, 2022 “motion for leave to enter final order” is denied without prejudice. Further,ORDERED that appellant’s February 9, 2022 “motion to file appendix to appellant’s initial brief in separate filings” is granted. Appellant may split the appendix into two separate PDFs. If appellant remains unable to file the appendix in two separate PDFs, then appellant's counsel shall contact this court's Clerk's Office for further assistance.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-02
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix to Response
|
| Description |
Appendix to Response ~ APPENDIX TO APPELLANT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-28
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ENTER FINAL ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-18
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ENTER FINAL ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-18
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-18
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Order Denying Motion For Review ~ ORDERED that, upon consideration of the appellant’s December 13, 2021 jurisdictional brief, this appeal shall proceed from the November 22, 2021 “order on landlord’s motions for summary judgment” and the November 22, 2021 “final judgment for eviction and possession.” See Luke Invs., Inc. v. Camelot Condo. Owners Ass’n, Inc. ex rel Unit Owners of Camelot, 974 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Buzzi v. Quality Serv. Station, Inc., 921 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Further, ORDERED that appellant’s December 21, 2021 motion for review is denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-05
|
| Type |
Response
|
| Subtype |
Response
|
| Description |
Response ~ IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REVIEW OF STAY ORDER
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief ~ ORDERED that appellant's January 4, 2022 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief and appendix within fifteen (15) days from the date the Court enters an order on the jurisdictional issue. In addition, if the initial brief and appendix are not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-01-04
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-22
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Request for Emergency Treatment
|
| Description |
Denying Request for Emergency Treatment ~ ORDERED that the appellant’s December 21, 2021 request for emergency treatment is denied. The court will handle the filing in the normal course of business. No motion for rehearing as to this order will be entertained.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-21
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion For Review
|
| Description |
Motion For Review ~ EMERGENCY
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-21
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR REVIEW.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Jurisdictional Brief
|
| Description |
Jurisdictional Brief ~ **STRICKEN**
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-07
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Filing Fee
|
| Description |
ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal ~ The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY.ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection.**NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed
|
| On Behalf Of |
Guilty Pleasures SF LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-01
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Fee Status
|
| Description |
A3:Paid In Full - $300
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-05
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Vacating/Withdrawing Order
|
| Description |
ORD-Amended Order ~ ORDERED that this court's May 4, 2022 order is amended as follows: ORDERED that part two of appellee's proposed appendix to the answer brief is strickenas not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amendedeffective October 1, 2017, in that it was not completely text searchable. An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-20
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix to Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
Thomas Campaniello
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-05-04
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Order Striking Appendix - Non-Compliance With R. 9.220 ~ **SEE AMENDED ORDER**ORDERED that part two of appellee's proposed appendix to the answer brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220(c), which was amended effective October 1, 2017, in that it was not completely text searchable, and was not paginated so that the page numbers displayed by the PDF reader exactly match the pagination of the index. An amended appendix in compliance with Rule 9.220(c) shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order Striking Filing
|
| Description |
Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 ~ ORDERED that appellant's December 13, 2021 statement of jurisdictional basis is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-12-03
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order to File Response re Jurisdiction
|
| Description |
AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction ~ ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the November 22, 2021 order on landlord's motion for summary judgment is an appealable final or nonfinal order, as it appears Counts III and IV of the complaint and Count I of the counterclaim remain pending. See Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass'n, 303 So. 2d 1, 5 (Fla. 1974) ("We adhere to the rule that piecemeal appeals should not be permitted where claims are legally interrelated and in substance involve the same transaction."); Flinn v. Flinn, 68 So. 3d 424, 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Further,Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement.
|
|
