|
SHANNON ROSE, VS CRESPI OWNER, LLC, etc.,
|
3D2022-0272
|
2022-02-09
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
21-8597
|
Parties
| Name |
SHANNON ROSE LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CRESPI OWNER LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
BENJAMIN R. DISHOWITZ, JOHN D. VOIGT
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Lourdes Simon
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2022-07-22
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-22
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Mandate
|
| Description |
Mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-07-06
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Affirmed
|
| Description |
Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-06-24
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Order Denying ORAL ARGUMENT ~ Upon consideration, the pro se appellant’s Request for Oral Argument is hereby denied.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-04-08
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Record on Appeal
|
| Description |
Record on Appeal
|
| On Behalf Of |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Appellee's Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-11
|
| Type |
Record
|
| Subtype |
Appendix
|
| Description |
Appendix ~ APPENDIX TO ANSWER BRIEF
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-08
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion Denied (OD999) ~ Pro se Appellant’s Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and for Temporary Stay Pending Consideration of Motion is treated as a motion for review of the trial court’s order on the motion to stay, and the motion is hereby denied. Upon consideration, pro se Appellant’s Motion for Leave to Reply to Appellee’s Response to the Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and for Temporary Stay Pending Consideration of Motion is hereby denied, and the Reply attached to said Motion is stricken as unauthorized. FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY and HENDON, JJ., concur.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-03-03
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY TO APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TOAPPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL AND FORTEMPORARY STAY PENDING CONSIDERATION OF MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Shannon Rose
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-25
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Stay
|
| Description |
Motion To Stay ~ MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL AND FOR TEMPORARYSTAY PENDING CONSIDERATION OF MOTION
|
| On Behalf Of |
Shannon Rose
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-17
|
| Type |
Motions Relating to Oral Argument
|
| Subtype |
Motion/Request for Oral Argument
|
| Description |
Request for Oral Argument
|
| On Behalf Of |
Shannon Rose
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal
|
| Description |
Notice of Appeal Filed ~ NOT CERTIFIED.
|
| On Behalf Of |
Shannon Rose
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-17
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Shannon Rose
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
|
| Description |
Certificate of Indigency ~ Indigent.
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Related Case or Issue
|
| Description |
Notice of Similar or Related Case
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2022-02-09
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case letter with attachments.
|
|
|
|
SHANNON ROSE, VS CRESPI OWNER, LLC, etc.,
|
3D2021-1660
|
2021-08-17
|
Closed
|
|
| Classification |
NOA Non Final - Circuit Civil - Other
|
| Court |
3rd District Court of Appeal
|
| Originating Court |
County Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County
21-8597
|
Parties
| Name |
SHANNON ROSE LLC
|
| Role |
Appellant
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
CRESPI OWNER LLC
|
| Role |
Appellee
|
| Status |
Active
|
| Representations |
JOHN D. VOIGT, BENJAMIN R. DISHOWITZ
|
|
| Name |
Hon. Pedro P. Echarte, Jr.
|
| Role |
Judge/Judicial Officer
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
| Name |
Miami-Dade Clerk
|
| Role |
Lower Tribunal Clerk
|
| Status |
Active
|
|
Docket Entries
| Docket Date |
2021-10-25
|
| Type |
Mandate
|
| Subtype |
Disp. w/o Mandate
|
| Description |
Disp w/o mandate
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-25
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
West Publishing
|
| Description |
West Publishing
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-05
|
| Type |
Disposition by Opinion
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Dismissed - Order by Judge
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-10-05
|
| Type |
Disposition by Order
|
| Subtype |
Dismissed
|
| Description |
Appeal Dismissed by the Court ATFANAO (DA11A) ~ Upon review of pro se Appellant’s response to this Court’s September 13, 2021, Order to show cause as to why the appeal should not be dismissed as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order, and upon further consideration of pro se Appellant’s failure to identify a provision of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure that permits an interlocutory review of the order or orders appealed, and this Court’s independent determination that the order or orders appealed are non-final, non-appealable orders, this Court hereby dismisses the appeal as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-28
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| Description |
Motion To Dismiss
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-23
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Extension granted to file answer brief (OG04) ~ Appellee’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to File the answer brief is granted to and including October 13, 2021.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-23
|
| Type |
Motions Other
|
| Subtype |
Miscellaneous Motion
|
| Description |
Miscellaneous Motion ~ MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE TO NOT DISMISS NON-FINAL APPEAL
|
| On Behalf Of |
Shannon Rose
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-21
|
| Type |
Motions Extensions
|
| Subtype |
Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Answer Brief
|
| Description |
Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-09-13
|
| Type |
Order
|
| Subtype |
Show Cause
|
| Description |
Show Cause Why App.Shldn't be DATFANAO(OR12G) ~ Appellant shall show cause, within ten (10) days from the date of this Order, as to why the appeal should not be dismissed as one taken from a non-final, non-appealable order.
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-23
|
| Type |
Brief
|
| Subtype |
Initial Brief
|
| Description |
Initial Brief on Merits
|
| On Behalf Of |
Shannon Rose
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-19
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appearance
|
| Description |
Notice of Appearance
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-17
|
| Type |
Notice
|
| Subtype |
Notice of Appeal Transmittal Form
|
| Description |
Notice of Transmittal--NOA
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-17
|
| Type |
Misc. Events
|
| Subtype |
Determination of Indigency/LT Order Insolvency
|
| Description |
Certificate of Indigency ~ Indigent.
|
| On Behalf Of |
CRESPI OWNER, LLC
|
|
| Docket Date |
2021-08-17
|
| Type |
Letter
|
| Subtype |
Acknowledgment Letter
|
| Description |
Acknowledgment Letter ~ Acknowledgment of new case letter with attachments.
|
|
|
